An illusion of relative motion dependent upon spatial frequency and orientation

Observers scanned a stationary pattern comprising a tilted sine-wave grating completely surrounding another grating of similar spatial frequency but tilted in the opposite direction (Fig. 2). They reported an illusory "sliding" motion of the inset grating with respect to the surround grating and the effect was clearly strongest for angles between the gratings of less than 60 degrees and for spatial frequencies between 6-11 cpd. In a second experiment, a similar pattern was moved (2.0 deg/sec) either up or down for a presentation time of 167 msec. Simultaneously, the inset grating was drifted at different speeds in each of its two directions. Using the method of constant stimuli, it was shown that the relative motion illusion could be cancelled by physically drifting the grating in the opposite direction to the illusory movement. The illusion arises because there is a failure to integrate two motion signals into the single motion vector which characterises rigid motion.

[1]  D. Mackay.  Moving Visual Images produced by Regular Stationary Patterns , 1958, Nature.

[2]  B Moulden,et al.  A Simultaneous Shift in Apparent Direction: Further Evidence for a “Distribution-Shift” Model of Direction Coding , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  D. Burr,et al.  Selective depression of motion sensitivity during saccades. , 1982, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  R. von der Heydt,et al.  Periodic-pattern-selective cells in monkey visual cortex , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[5]  K. D. Valois,et al.  Motion contrast and motion integration , 1993, Vision Research.

[6]  R. L. Valois,et al.  Vernier acuity with stationary moving Gabors , 1991, Vision Research.

[7]  D. Burr,et al.  Selective suppression of the magnocellular visual pathway during saccadic eye movements , 1994, Nature.

[8]  Jane E. Raymond,et al.  Directional anisotropy of motion sensitivity across the visual field , 1994, Vision Research.

[9]  N J Wade,et al.  Op Art and Visual Perception , 1978, Perception.

[10]  Robert Jefferson Snowden,et al.  Motions in orthogonal directions are mutually suppressive , 1989 .

[11]  T. Hine,et al.  The Ouchi illusion: An anomaly in the perception of rigid motion for limited spatial frequencies and angles , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  L. Spillmann,et al.  The Perception of Movement and Depth in Moiré Patterns , 1993, Perception.

[13]  R. Steinman,et al.  Saccades in Neal’s “Square o f Three” , 1973 .

[14]  J. J. Koenderink,et al.  Inhomogeneity and anisotropies for motion detection in the monocular visual field of human observers , 1993, Vision Research.

[15]  A comment: Mackay Rays shimmer due to accommodation changes , 1993, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  E. Adelson,et al.  Phenomenal coherence of moving visual patterns , 1982, Nature.

[17]  The cortical Enigma: a reply to Professor Gregory , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  M. Wertheimer,et al.  A source book of Gestalt psychology. , 1939 .

[19]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Motion capture anisotropy , 1987, Vision Research.

[20]  E Kowler,et al.  Smooth pursuit of small-amplitude sinusoidal motion. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[21]  K. Hoffmann,et al.  Motion perception during saccades , 1993, Vision Research.

[22]  J Zhang,et al.  Motion contrast and motion integration. , 1993, Vision research.

[23]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Spatial phase and frequency in motion capture of random-dot patterns. , 1985, Spatial vision.

[24]  D. H. Kelly.  Motion and vision. II. Stabilized spatio-temporal threshold surface. , 1979, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[25]  Keith D. White,et al.  Contrast sensitivity during saccadic eye movements , 1978, Vision Research.

[26]  G. Westheimer,et al.  Fluctuations of accommodation under steady viewing conditions , 1959, The Journal of physiology.

[27]  H. Wallach.  The perception of motion. , 1959, Scientific American.

[28]  K. Nakayama,et al.  The aperture problem—II. Spatial integration of velocity information along contours , 1988, Vision Research.

[29]  S Zeki,et al.  Going beyond the information given: the relation of illusory visual motion to brain activity , 1993, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  K. D. De Valois,et al.  Vernier acuity with stationary moving Gabors. , 1991, Vision research.

[31]  L. Spillmann,et al.  Visual Perception: The Neurophysiological Foundations , 1989 .

[32]  D. M. MacKAY,et al.  Visual Effects of Non-redundant Stimulation , 1961, Nature.

[33]  R. Klein,et al.  What are human express saccades? , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  Robert Sekuler,et al.  Detection and identification of moving targets , 1983, Vision Research.

[35]  J J Koenderink,et al.  Spatiotemporal contrast detection threshold surface is bimodal. , 1979, Optics letters.

[36]  K. Nakayama,et al.  The aperture problem—I. Perception of nonrigidity and motion direction in translating sinusoidal lines , 1988, Vision Research.