Metrecom measurement of navicular drop in subjects with anterior cruciate ligament injury.

OBJECTIVE Research suggests that excessive pronation of the foot contributes to the incidence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears by increasing internal tibial rotation. Studies have documented greater navicular drop values in individuals with a history of an ACL tear using methods that may not accurately follow the motion of underlying bone. The purpose of our investigation was to compare the navicular drop of subjects with a history of ACL tears with healthy controls when measured by a Metrecom. SUBJECTS Eighteen subjects previously diagnosed with a torn ACL were matched by age, sex, and limb to noninjured control subjects. DESIGN AND SETTING Static group comparisons of navicular drop in subjects with an injured ACL and subjects having no history of ACL injury. MEASUREMENTS A single investigator performed the measure of navicular drop. The position of the navicular tuberosity was digitized while the subject stood barefoot on a flat surface in subtalar joint neutral and in relaxed stance. Intrarater reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient and standard error of the measurement. An independent t test assessed the difference between the amount of navicular drop in the ACL group and the controls. RESULTS Analysis of repeated measures, intraclass correlation coefficient (2,1), demonstrated intrarater reliability for the measure of navicular drop to be 0.90; the standard error of measurement was 1.19 mm. The independent t test showed a statistically greater amount of navicular drop in the ACL group. CONCLUSIONS Excellent intrarater reliability was demonstrated when using the Metrecom to measure navicular drop. Excessive subtalar joint pronation, measured as navicular drop, was identified as 1 factor that may contribute to ACL injury.

[1]  Brody Dm.  Running injuries. Prevention and management. , 1987 .

[2]  R. Donatelli.  The Biomechanics of the Foot and Ankle , 1995 .

[3]  G. Smidt,et al.  Evaluation of the metrecom and its use in quantifying skeletal landmark locations. , 1992, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[4]  T. Worrell,et al.  Reliability of open and closed kinetic chain subtalar joint neutral positions and navicular drop test. , 1993, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[5]  S. Messier,et al.  Etiologic factors associated with selected running injuries. , 1988, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[6]  Cabaud He.  Biomechanics of the anterior cruciate ligament. , 1983 .

[7]  C. Saltzman,et al.  The effect of foot orthotics on three-dimensional kinematics of the leg and rearfoot during running. , 1995, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[8]  D. Tiberio,et al.  Pathomechanics of structural foot deformities. , 1988, Physical therapy.

[9]  Moul Jl.  Differences in Selected Predictors of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears Between Male and Female NCAA Division I Collegiate Basketball Players. , 1998 .

[10]  Bowers Kd,et al.  Incidence of Hyperpronation in the ACL Injured Knee: A Clinical Perspective. , 1992 .

[11]  Kurt Manal,et al.  A comparison of three-dimensional lower extremity kinematics during running between excessive pronators and normals. , 1998, Clinical biomechanics.

[12]  C. Denegar,et al.  Risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament injury in high school and college athletes. , 1994, Journal of athletic training.

[13]  M. J. Muêller,et al.  Navicular drop as a composite measure of excessive pronation. , 1993, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[14]  J. Moul.  Differences in Selected Predictors of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears Between Male and Female NCAA Division I Collegiate Basketball Players. , 1998, Journal of athletic training.

[15]  Mark D. Miller,et al.  Normal Anatomy and Biomechanics of the Knee , 2001 .

[16]  R D D'Ambrosia,et al.  Orthotic devices in running injuries. , 1985, Clinics in sports medicine.

[17]  H. Menz,et al.  Alternative techniques for the clinical assessment of foot pronation. , 1998, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[18]  J. Loudon,et al.  The relationship between static posture and ACL injury in female athletes. , 1996, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[19]  J. Bartko,et al.  On Various Intraclass Correlation Reliability Coefficients , 1976 .

[20]  B. Maslen,et al.  Radiographic study of skin displacement errors in the foot and ankle during standing. , 1994, Clinical biomechanics.

[21]  T. Worrell,et al.  Two measurement techniques for assessing subtalar joint position: a reliability study. , 1994, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[22]  M. L. Gross,et al.  Effectiveness of orthotic shoe inserts in the long-distance runner , 1991, The American journal of sports medicine.

[23]  M. E. Beckett,et al.  Incidence of Hyperpronation in the ACL Injured Knee: A Clinical Perspective. , 1992, Journal of athletic training.

[24]  C. Saltzman,et al.  Complexities of foot architecture as a base of support. , 1995, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[25]  H. E. Cabaud.  Biomechanics of the anterior cruciate ligament. , 1983, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[26]  Irene S. McClay,et al.  Coupling Parameters in Runners With Normal and Excessive Pronation , 1997 .

[27]  Catherine Busseuil,et al.  Rearfoot-Forefoot Orientation and Traumatic Risk for Runners , 1998, Foot & ankle international.

[28]  D. Perrin,et al.  Role of hyperpronation as a possible risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament injuries. , 1997, Journal of athletic training.