Face-to-Face, Buzz, and Knowledge Bases: Sociospatial Implications for Learning, Innovation, and Innovation Policy

Whilst concurring with the new streams of literature in geography that highlight the importance of face-to-face and ‘buzz’ in the globalizing learning economy, we argue that this literature is misleading on three interrelated counts. Firstly, it conflates face-to-face and buzz; secondly, it fails to distinguish between the importance of face-to-face and buzz for industries drawing on different knowledge bases; and, thirdly, these conceptual inadequacies lead to an exaggeration of the importance of cities as sites for creativity and innovation, and hence regional competitiveness. By applying an industrial knowledge base approach, we seek to reconstruct an alternative framework that allows for a systematic differentiation between the importance of face-to-face and buzz for different industries. This provides a framework for developing a more nuanced understanding of the spatial implications of face-to-face communication and buzz for learning and innovation.

[1]  B. Seely,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice , 1991 .

[2]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[3]  Walter G. Vincenti,et al.  What Engineers Know and How They Know It: Analytical Studies from Aeronautical History. , 1992 .

[4]  J. Urry,et al.  Economies of signs and space , 1994 .

[5]  B. Lundvall,et al.  The Learning Economy , 1994 .

[6]  Michel Dimou.  The industrial district: A stage of a diffuse industrialization process—the case of Roanne , 1994 .

[7]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[8]  Peter Maskell,et al.  Localized Learning and Industrial Competitiveness , 1995 .

[9]  Anders Söderholm,et al.  A theory of the temporary organization , 1995 .

[10]  Walter Guido Vincenti,et al.  What Engineers Know and How They Know It: Analytical Studies from Aeronautical History by Walter G. Vincenti , 1992, Technology and Culture.

[11]  A. Scott.  The Cultural Economy of Cities , 1997 .

[12]  Staffan Laestadius,et al.  Technology Level, Knowledge Formation, and Industrial Competence in Paper Manufacturing , 1998 .

[13]  M. Arthur,et al.  Paradox in Project-Based Enterprise: The Case of Film Making , 1998 .

[14]  K. Pavitt.  SPRU Electronic Working Paper No 5 The Social Shaping of the National Science Base , 1998 .

[15]  Localised learning and community capabilities: On organisation of knowledge in markets, firms and communities. the case of Danish furniture producers , 1999 .

[16]  A. Scott.  The cultural economy: geography and the creative field , 1999 .

[17]  A. Kaufmann,et al.  Systems of Innovation in Traditional Industrial Regions: The Case of Styria in a Comparative Perspective , 2000 .

[18]  I. Nonaka,et al.  SECI, Ba and Leadership: a Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation , 2000 .

[19]  Gernot Grabher,et al.  Ecologies of Creativity: The Village, the Group, and the Heterarchic Organisation of the British Advertising Industry , 2001 .

[20]  Udo Staber,et al.  The Institutional Embeddedness of Project Networks: The Case of Content Production in German Television , 2002 .

[21]  A. Pratt.  Hot Jobs in Cool Places. The Material Cultures of New Media Product Spaces: The Case of South of the Market, San Francisco , 2002 .

[22]  Edward Lorenz,et al.  Why all this fuss about codified and tacit knowledge , 2002 .

[23]  S. Christopherson.  Why Do National Labor Market Practices Continue to Diverge in the Global Economy? The “Missing Link” of Investment Rules* , 2002 .

[24]  A. Scott.  A new map of Hollywood: the production and distribution of American motion pictures , 2002 .

[25]  Gernot Grabher.  Cool Projects, Boring Institutions: Temporary Collaboration in Social Context , 2002 .

[26]  R. Florida.  The Rise of the Creative Class : And How It's Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life , 2003 .

[27]  Stefan H. Thomke,et al.  Experimentation Matters: Unlocking the Potential of New Technologies for Innovation , 2003 .

[28]  A. Venables,et al.  Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy , 2004 .

[29]  A. Malmberg.  Beyond the cluster. Local milieus and global connections , 2003 .

[30]  Marco Bellandi,et al.  From Industrial Districts to Local Development: An Itinerary of Research , 2003 .

[31]  Conceptualizing and Measuring Modern Biotechnology , 2004 .

[32]  Bj⊘rn Asheim,et al.  Nodes, networks and proximities: on the knowledge dynamics of the Medicon Valley biotech cluster , 2004 .

[33]  Gunnar Törnqvist.  Creativity in time and space , 2004 .

[34]  A. Amin,et al.  Architectures of Knowledge: Firms, Capabilities, and Communities , 2004 .

[35]  Gernot Grabher.  Temporary Architectures of Learning: Knowledge Governance in Project Ecologies , 2004 .

[36]  P. Cooke.  Special issue: globalisation of biotechnology , 2004 .

[37]  H. Bathelt,et al.  Temporary Clusters and Knowledge Creation: The Effects of International Trade Fairs, Conventions and Other Professional Gatherings , 2004 .

[38]  H. Bathelt,et al.  Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation , 2004 .

[39]  A. Scott.  On Hollywood: The Place, The Industry , 2005 .

[40]  Patrick Cohendet,et al.  Geographies of Knowledge Formation in Firms , 2005 .

[41]  P. Cooke.  Rational drug design, the knowledge value chain and bioscience megacentres , 2005 .

[42]  Meric S. Gertler,et al.  Local Nodes in Global Networks: The Geography of Knowledge Flows in Biotechnology Innovation , 2005 .

[43]  Jan Vang,et al.  Rethinking the Spatial Organization of Creative Industries , 2005 .

[44]  A. Malmberg,et al.  Localized learning revisited , 2006 .

[45]  Transnational Communities, Offshore Outsourcing and Offshore Subsidiaries: The Case of the Indian IT Service Industry , 2006 .