The effects of radiation dose and CT manufacturer on measurements of lung densitometry.

BACKGROUND To evaluate the effect of radiation dose and scanner manufacturer on quantitative CT scan measurements of lung morphology in smokers. METHODS Low-dose and high-dose, inspiratory, multislice CT scans were obtained in 50 subjects at intervals of approximately 6 months (mean [+/- SD] interval, 0.5 +/- 0.2 years). In another 30 subjects, multislice CT scans were acquired first using a GE LightSpeed Ultra (General Electric Healthcare; Milwaukee, WI), followed a mean time of 1.2 +/- 0.4 years later by using a Siemens Sensation 16 scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions; Erlangen, Germany). Custom software was used to measure lung volume, mass, mean density, and the extent of emphysema using threshold cutoffs of -950, -910, and -856 Hounsfield units (HU) and the lowest 15th and 5th percentile points. RESULTS The change in radiograph dose significantly affected measurements of emphysema assessed using mean lung density, threshold, or percentile methods. There were also interactions between dose and total lung volume for all of the measurements except the -950-HU threshold and the lowest fifth percentile point. These two emphysema measurements suggest that there was more emphysema found in the CT scans obtained using a lower radiograph dose. Only the mean lung density and -856-HU threshold showed significant effects between CT scanner manufacturers and interactions between total lung volume and scanner. All other measures of lung structure were not different between the two CT scanners. CONCLUSION CT scan measurements of very low density lung structures are significantly affected by radiation dose but are less sensitive to the lung volume. Image acquisition parameters including radiation dose, scanner type, and the subject's breath size should be standardized to estimate emphysema severity in longitudinal studies.

[1]  S. Suzuki,et al.  Correlation of quantitative CT with selective alveolobronchogram and pulmonary function tests in emphysema. , 1994, Chest.

[2]  A A Bankier,et al.  Pulmonary emphysema: subjective visual grading versus objective quantification with macroscopic morphometry and thin-section CT densitometry. , 1999, Radiology.

[3]  H. Itoh,et al.  An automated method to assess the distribution of low attenuation areas on chest CT scans in chronic pulmonary emphysema patients. , 1994, Chest.

[4]  Y. Nakano,et al.  Optimized scanning conditions of high resolution CT in the follow-up of pulmonary emphysema. , 1999, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[5]  M. Mascalchi,et al.  Spirometric-Gated Computed Tomography Quantitative Evaluation of Lung Emphysema in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Comparison of 3 Techniques , 2004, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[6]  Y. Oku,et al.  Standardization of low attenuation area versus total lung area in chest X-ray CT as an indicator of chronic pulmonary emphysema. , 1997, Frontiers of medical and biological engineering : the international journal of the Japan Society of Medical Electronics and Biological Engineering.

[7]  H A Vrooman,et al.  Sources of error in lung densitometry with CT. , 1999, Investigative radiology.

[8]  Jonathan G Goldin,et al.  Emphysema: effect of reconstruction algorithm on CT imaging measures. , 2004, Radiology.

[9]  Steven Piantadosi,et al.  Rationale and design of the national emphysema treatment trial: A prospective randomized trial of lung volume reduction surgery , 1999 .

[10]  P De Vuyst,et al.  Comparison of computed density and macroscopic morphometry in pulmonary emphysema. , 1995, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[11]  J. Best,et al.  CT measurements of lung density in life can quantitate distal airspace enlargement--an essential defining feature of human emphysema. , 1988, The American review of respiratory disease.

[12]  N H Holstein-Rathlou,et al.  Volume adjustment of lung density by computed tomography scans in patients with emphysema , 2004, Acta radiologica.

[13]  S. Lam,et al.  Lung cancer screening: a different paradigm. , 2003, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[14]  J. Verschakelen,et al.  Measurement of lung density by means of quantitative CT scanning. A study of correlations with pulmonary function tests. , 1992 .

[15]  P. Gevenois,et al.  Quantitative computed tomography assessment of lung structure and function in pulmonary emphysema. , 2001, The European respiratory journal.

[16]  R M Slone,et al.  Patients with emphysema: quantitative CT analysis before and after lung volume reduction surgery. Work in progress. , 1997, Radiology.

[17]  P. Gevenois,et al.  Pulmonary emphysema: objective quantification at multi-detector row CT--comparison with macroscopic and microscopic morphometry. , 2006, Radiology.

[18]  J. Hogg,et al.  Regional lung volume and pleural pressure gradient estimated from lung density in dogs. , 1969, Journal of applied physiology.

[19]  Jan Stolk,et al.  Comparison of the Sensitivities of 5 Different Computed Tomography Scanners for the Assessment of the Progression of Pulmonary Emphysema: A Phantom Study , 2004, Investigative radiology.

[20]  J. Best,et al.  DIAGNOSIS OF PULMONARY EMPHYSEMA BY COMPUTERISED TOMOGRAPHY , 1984, The Lancet.

[21]  J. V. van Engelshoven,et al.  Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: evaluation with spirometrically controlled CT lung densitometry. , 1994, Radiology.

[22]  Jan Stolk,et al.  Optimization and Standardization of Lung Densitometry in the Assessment of Pulmonary Emphysema , 2004, Investigative radiology.

[23]  H A Vrooman,et al.  A randomized clinical trial of alpha(1)-antitrypsin augmentation therapy. , 1999, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[24]  L. Hedlund,et al.  Evaluating Lung Density by Computed Tomography , 1983 .

[25]  G J Kemerink,et al.  Scanner conformity in CT densitometry of the lungs. , 1995, Radiology.

[26]  N J Morrison,et al.  Quantitation of emphysema by computed tomography using a "density mask" program and correlation with pulmonary function tests. , 1990, Chest.

[27]  M S Frank,et al.  CT of the lung in patients with pulmonary emphysema: diagnosis, quantification, and correlation with pathologic and physiologic findings. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[28]  A T Redpath,et al.  Parenchymal emphysema measured by CT lung density correlates with lung function in patients with bullous disease. , 1993, The European respiratory journal.

[29]  Jan Stolk,et al.  Influence of calibration on densitometric studies of emphysema progression using computed tomography. , 2004, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[30]  R M Slone,et al.  Repeatability of quantitative CT indexes of emphysema in patients evaluated for lung volume reduction surgery. , 2001, Radiology.

[31]  S. Piantadosi A prospective randomized trial of lung volume reduction surgery , 2000 .

[32]  P. Paré,et al.  Measurement of lung expansion with computed tomography and comparison with quantitative histology. , 1995, Journal of applied physiology.

[33]  N. Müller,et al.  "Density mask". An objective method to quantitate emphysema using computed tomography. , 1988, Chest.

[34]  W M Thurlbeck,et al.  Emphysema: definition, imaging, and quantification. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[35]  P. Paré,et al.  A quantification of the lung surface area in emphysema using computed tomography. , 1999, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.