Crashworthiness and lightweight optimization to applied multiple materials and foam-filled front end structure of auto-body

Auto-body’s front end structure, such as bumper and crash box, has the vital function of protecting other components from damage during low-velocity collision; moreover, it should accomplish excellent lightweight effect under the insurance of crashworthiness. This article combined the two approaches of lightweight improvement that listed as using structural optimization and replacing original materials with high strength and high mass efficiency materials or employing reinforced materials to conduct the crashworthiness optimization of assembly of bumper, crash box, and front rail. The original materials of bumper, crash box, and front rail were replaced by aluminum alloy 6060, TRIP800, and DP800, respectively. Aluminum foam was filled in bumper to replace the original reinforced plate and also was filled in crash box to increase energy absorption. The comparisons were made between an optimal selection from the multiple materials designs and the single material design. During optimization, crashworthiness criteria were defined as constraint conditions, and response surface surrogate model and genetic algorithm with elite strategy were employed to solve mathematical model of minimum mass. In single material optimization, the result already achieved the energy absorption increased by 10.1%, the peak collision force and the crumple distance decreased by 11.1% and 12.6%, respectively, and the total mass decreased by 11.1%. As for multiple materials optimization, the results obtained further optimal values. It is found that foam-filled bumper can overcome the disadvantage of bumper mid-bending that causes bumper failure of load bearing, and foam filler has the interaction effect with crash box as well, through which it received a significant growth of energy absorption. The application of multiple materials design greatly expands the potential of crashworthiness and lightweight optimization.

[1]  Guangyao Li,et al.  Crashworthiness optimization of foam-filled tapered thin-walled structure using multiple surrogate models , 2013 .

[2]  Yefa Hu,et al.  Research on carbon fiber–reinforced plastic bumper beam subjected to low-velocity frontal impact , 2015 .

[3]  Qian Wang,et al.  Modeling and optimization of foam-filled thin-walled columns for crashworthiness designs , 2010 .

[4]  Zhibin Li,et al.  Deformation and energy absorption of aluminum foam-filled tubes subjected to oblique loading , 2012 .

[5]  Zonghua Zhang,et al.  Design optimization of the S-frame to improve crashworthiness , 2014 .

[6]  Jánes Landre,et al.  A Numerical Model to Study the Effects of Aluminum Foam Filler on the Dynamic Behavior of a Steel Tubular Energy Absorber Using a Multi-Node Displacement Evaluation Procedure , 2014 .

[7]  David P. Thambiratnam,et al.  Dynamic energy absorption characteristics of foam-filled conical tubes under oblique impact loading , 2010 .

[8]  Michael E. Carley,et al.  Advancements in Expanded Polypropylene Foam Energy Management for Bumper Systems , 2004 .

[9]  Myoung-Gyu Lee,et al.  Advanced Issues in springback , 2013 .

[10]  Shiwei Zhou,et al.  Crashworthiness design for functionally graded foam-filled thin-walled structures , 2010 .

[11]  Raymond M. Kolonay,et al.  Nonlinear Response Structural Optimization of a Joined Wing Using Equivalent Loads , 2008 .

[12]  T. Wierzbicki,et al.  Experimental and numerical studies of foam-filled sections , 2000 .

[13]  O. Hopperstad,et al.  Constitutive modeling of aluminum foam including fracture and statistical variation of density , 2003 .

[14]  Tie Wang,et al.  Design and analysis of automotive carbon fiber composite bumper beam based on finite element analysis , 2015 .

[15]  Guofei Chen,et al.  Influence of AHSS Part Geometric Features on Crash Behavior , 2006 .

[16]  M. Attia,et al.  Nonlinear finite element analysis of the crush behaviour of functionally graded foam-filled columns , 2012 .

[17]  M. Langseth,et al.  Axial crushing of thin-walled high-strength steel sections , 2006 .

[18]  M. Strano,et al.  Design and manufacturing of anti-intrusion bars made of aluminium foam filled tubes , 2013 .

[19]  Yuchao Wang,et al.  Investigation on frictional characteristic of deep-groove ball bearings subjected to radial loads , 2015 .

[20]  Wenjie Zuo,et al.  Bi-level optimization for the cross-sectional shape of a thin-walled car body frame with static stiffness and dynamic frequency stiffness constraints , 2015 .

[21]  Arturo González,et al.  Characterization of non-linear bearings using the Hilbert–Huang transform , 2015 .

[22]  E. Acar,et al.  Multi-objective crashworthiness optimization of tapered thin-walled tubes with axisymmetric indentations , 2011 .

[23]  Penghao Hu.  Analysis of Slider Motion Error on 3-PUU Parallel Coordinate Measuring Maching , 2015 .

[24]  Larsgunnar Nilsson,et al.  Evaluation of response surface methodologies used in crashworthiness optimization , 2006 .

[25]  N. Fleck,et al.  Isotropic constitutive models for metallic foams , 2000 .

[26]  Hesham A. Ezzat,et al.  Mass Efficient Front Crush Can Design , 2011 .

[28]  Ireneusz Wróbel,et al.  Numerical Effectiveness of the Simulation of an Automotive Body Part Stamping , 2015 .

[29]  O. Hopperstad,et al.  Validation of constitutive models applicable to aluminium foams , 2002 .

[30]  Clifford C. Chou,et al.  Use of Truncated Finite Element Modeling for Efficient Design Optimization of an Automotive Front End Structure , 2015 .

[31]  K. S. Choi,et al.  Microstructure-Based Constitutive Modeling of TRIP Steel: Prediction of Ductility and Failure Modes under Different Loading Conditions , 2009 .

[32]  David K. Matlock,et al.  Third Generation of AHSS: Microstructure Design Concepts , 2009 .

[33]  Shu Yang,et al.  Crushing analysis and multiobjective crashworthiness optimization of tapered square tubes under oblique impact loading , 2012 .