Quorum-regulated biofilms enhance the development of conditionally viable, environmental Vibrio cholerae

The factors that enhance the waterborne spread of bacterial epidemics and sustain the pathogens in nature are unclear. The epidemic diarrheal disease cholera caused by Vibrio cholerae spreads through water contaminated with the pathogen. However, the bacteria exist in water mostly as clumps of cells, which resist cultivation by standard techniques but revive into fully virulent form in the intestinal milieu. These conditionally viable environmental cells (CVEC), alternatively called viable but nonculturable cells, presumably play a crucial role in cholera epidemiology. However, the precise mechanism causing the transition of V. cholerae to the CVEC form and this form's significance in the biology of the pathogen are unknown. Here we show that this process involves biofilm formation that is dependent on quorum sensing, a regulatory response that is controlled by cell density. V. cholerae strains carrying mutations in genes required for quorum sensing and biofilm formation displayed altered CVEC formation in environmental water following intestinal infections. Analysis of naturally occurring V. cholerae CVEC showed that organisms that adopt this quiescent physiological state typically exist as clumps of cells that comprise a single clone closely related to isolates causing the most recent local cholera epidemic. These results support a model of cholera transmission in which in vivo-formed biofilms convert to CVEC upon the introduction of cholera stools into environmental water. Our data further suggest that a temporary loss of quorum sensing due to dilution of extracellular autoinducers confers a selective advantage to communities of V. cholerae by blocking quorum-mediated regulatory responses that would break down biofilms and thus interfere with CVEC formation.

[1]  J. Glenn Morris,et al.  Cholera transmission: the host, pathogen and bacteriophage dynamic , 2009, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[2]  A. Camilli,et al.  The Vibrio cholerae Hybrid Sensor Kinase VieS Contributes to Motility and Biofilm Regulation by Altering the Cyclic Diguanylate Level , 2008, Journal of bacteriology.

[3]  D. Cameron,et al.  A defined transposon mutant library and its use in identifying motility genes in Vibrio cholerae , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  D. Sack,et al.  Transmissibility of cholera: in vivo-formed biofilms and their relationship to infectivity and persistence in the environment. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  D. Sack,et al.  An improved technique for isolation of environmental Vibrio cholerae with epidemic potential: monitoring the emergence of a multiple-antibiotic-resistant epidemic strain in Bangladesh. , 2006, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[6]  Eric J. Nelson,et al.  Cholera stool bacteria repress chemotaxis to increase infectivity , 2006, Molecular microbiology.

[7]  David A. Sack,et al.  Self-limiting nature of seasonal cholera epidemics: Role of host-mediated amplification of phage , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Iftekhar Bin Naser,et al.  Seasonal epidemics of cholera inversely correlate with the prevalence of environmental cholera phages. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  D. Sack,et al.  Genetic diversity and virulence potential of environmental Vibrio cholerae population in a cholera-endemic area , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Bonnie L Bassler,et al.  Quorum sensing controls biofilm formation in Vibrio cholerae , 2003, Molecular microbiology.

[11]  Jun Zhu,et al.  Quorum sensing-dependent biofilms enhance colonization in Vibrio cholerae. , 2003, Developmental cell.

[12]  C. Walsh Antibiotics: Actions, Origins, Resistance , 2003 .

[13]  Susan M. Butler,et al.  Host-induced epidemic spread of the cholera bacterium , 2002, Nature.

[14]  W. D’Haeze,et al.  Quorum sensing in Vibrio cholerae? , 2002, Genome Biology.

[15]  Bonnie L. Bassler,et al.  Quorum-sensing regulators control virulence gene expression in Vibrio cholerae , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  R. Woodgate,et al.  Molecular Analysis of Antibiotic Resistance Gene Clusters in Vibrio cholerae O139 and O1 SXT Constins , 2001, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[17]  J. Sambrook,et al.  Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2001 .

[18]  M. Surette,et al.  Quorum sensing in Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium, and Vibrio harveyi: a new family of genes responsible for autoinducer production. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  S. Faruque,et al.  Epidemiology, Genetics, and Ecology of ToxigenicVibrio cholerae , 1998, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[20]  M. Surette,et al.  Quorum sensing in Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  M. Waldor,et al.  A new type of conjugative transposon encodes resistance to sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim, and streptomycin in Vibrio cholerae O139 , 1996, Journal of bacteriology.

[22]  Matthew K. Waldor,et al.  Lysogenic Conversion by a Filamentous Phage Encoding Cholera Toxin , 1996, Science.

[23]  S. Faruque,et al.  Molecular epidemiology of toxigenic Vibrio cholerae in Bangladesh studied by numerical analysis of rRNA gene restriction patterns , 1995, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[24]  V. DiRita Vibrio cholerae and cholera: molecular to global perspectives , 1995 .

[25]  M. Shahidullah,et al.  Presence of vibrios in surface water and their relation with cholera in a community. , 1984, Tropical and geographical medicine.

[26]  V. L. Miller,et al.  Synthesis of cholera toxin is positively regulated at the transcriptional level by toxR. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  E. T. Nelson,et al.  Vibrio cholerae adherence and colonization in experimental cholera: electron microscopic studies , 1976, Infection and immunity.

[28]  W. Ryan Guidelines for the Laboratory Diagnosis of Cholera , 1975 .

[29]  A. Bauer,et al.  Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. , 1966, American journal of clinical pathology.

[30]  K. Monsur A highly selective gelatin-taurocholate-tellurite medium for the isolation of Vibrio cholerae. , 1961, Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.

[31]  S. De,et al.  An experimental study of the mechanism of action of Vibriod cholerae on the intestinal mucous membrane. , 1953, The Journal of pathology and bacteriology.

[32]  J. Snow On the Mode of Communication of Cholera , 1856, Edinburgh medical journal.

[33]  Ø. Olsvik,et al.  Vibrio cholerae and cholera : molecular to global perspectives , 1994 .

[34]  R. Wenzel,et al.  Response of man to infection with Vibrio cholerae. I. Clinical, serologic, and bacteriologic responses to a known inoculum. , 1974, The Journal of infectious diseases.