Predicted effects of toxicant mixtures are confirmed by changes in fish species assemblages in Ohio, USA, rivers

The purposes of this study were to investigate whether exposure to toxicant mixtures is associated with fish assemblage characteristics in the field and to describe the relationships between predicted chronic and acute mixture risks and observed impacts. Fish abundance and abiotic monitoring data from Ohio, USA, surface waters were compiled and analyzed. Variability of biotic and abiotic parameters was large. Exposure assessment, risk assessment with species‐sensitivity distributions, and mixture toxicity rules were used to calculate a relative risk predictor: The multisubstance potentially affected fraction of species (msPAF). Predicted acute and chronic risks ranged from low values to more than 10 and 50% of species potentially affected, respectively. Pearson correlations between predicted risk and observed assemblage characteristics were nonsignificant for total abundance, number of species, Shannon‐Weaver index, and evenness. Moderately significant correlations were found between predicted risk and abundance for 23% of individual species. Both abundance increases and decreases were observed. Generalized linear model (GLM) regressions revealed significant nonlinear associations between predicted risk and the abundance for 50% (metals and ammonia) and 55% (household product ingredients) of the species. Local ecological impact was expressed as the fraction of species expected but not observed, both with and without attribution of impact to mixture exposure. The association between predicted impacted fraction and the fraction of species expected but not observed was not significant. Predicted acute and chronic impacted fractions were associated significantly with the observed fraction of species likely lost by the action of toxicant mixtures under field conditions, with wide confidence bounds. These findings confirm the view that higher mixture impacts are expected in the field at higher msPAF.

[1]  S. Meek.  The Fishes of Ohio , 1901, The American Naturalist.

[2]  N. V. van Straalen,et al.  Ecotoxicological evaluation of soil quality criteria. , 1989, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[3]  J. H. Schuenemeyer,et al.  Generalized Linear Models (2nd ed.) , 1992 .

[4]  E. van de Plassche,et al.  Validation of some extrapolation methods with toxicity data derived from multiple species experiments. , 1993, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[5]  J. Canton,et al.  Validation of some extrapolation methods used for effect assessment , 1993 .

[6]  N Oreskes,et al.  Verification, Validation, and Confirmation of Numerical Models in the Earth Sciences , 1994, Science.

[7]  Eco,et al.  Validation of toxicity data and risk limits for soils:final report , 1998 .

[8]  Olivier Klepper,et al.  Mapping the potentially affected fraction (PAF) of species as a basis for comparison of ecotoxicological risks between substances and regions , 1998 .

[9]  Olivier Klepper,et al.  Estimating the Effect on Soil Organisms of Exceeding No-Observed Effect Concentrations (NOECs) of Persistent Toxicants , 1999 .

[10]  Tom C. J. Feijtel,et al.  Predicted no‐effect concentrations and risk characterization of four surfactants: Linear alkyl benzene sulfonate, alcohol ethoxylates, alcohol ethoxylated sulfates, and soap , 1999 .

[11]  M. Barbour,et al.  Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers: periphyton , 1999 .

[12]  Scott E. Belanger,et al.  Understanding single‐species and model ecosystem sensitivity: Data‐based comparison , 1999 .

[13]  Xinhao Wang,et al.  GIS-ROUT: A River Model for Watershed Planning , 2000 .

[14]  Eric P. Smith,et al.  Bottom‐up and top‐down approaches to assess multiple stressors over large geographic areas , 2000 .

[15]  G. Suter,et al.  Species Sensitivity Distributions in Ecotoxicology , 2001 .

[16]  P. Takács,et al.  Probabilistic Risk Assessment Using Species Sensitivity Distributions , 2001 .

[17]  M. Crane,et al.  Forecasting the environmental fate and effects of chemicals , 2001 .

[18]  D. Zwart,et al.  Conceptual and Technical Outlook on Species Sensitivity Distributions , 2001 .

[19]  Daren M. Carlisle,et al.  Use of predictive models for assessing the biological integrity of wetlands and other aquatic habitats , 2001 .

[20]  L. Posthuma,et al.  Effects of Zinc Contamination on a Natural Nematode Community in Outdoor Soil Mesocosms , 2002, Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[21]  Timo Hamers,et al.  The potentially affected fraction as a measure of ecological risk , 2002 .

[22]  Leo Posthuma,et al.  The value of the species sensitivity distribution concept for predicting field effects: (non-)confirmation of the concept using semifield experiments , 2002 .

[23]  S. Dyer,et al.  A comparison of stream biological responses to discharge from wastewater treatment plants in high and low population density areas , 2002, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[24]  Nicole A. Lazar,et al.  Statistical Analysis With Missing Data , 2003, Technometrics.

[25]  S. Bradbury,et al.  Meeting the scientific needs of ecological risk assessment in a regulatory context. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[26]  Joel E. Cohen,et al.  Bacterial traits, organism mass, and numerical abundance in the detrital soil food web of Dutch agricultural grasslands , 2004 .

[27]  D. de Zwart,et al.  Complex mixture toxicity for single and multiple species: Proposed methodologies , 2005, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[28]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .