The level of detail required in a deformable phantom to accurately perform quality assurance of deformable image registration

The primary purpose of the study was to determine how detailed deformable image registration (DIR) phantoms need to adequately simulate human anatomy and accurately assess the quality of DIR algorithms. In particular, how many distinct tissues are required in a phantom to simulate complex human anatomy? Pelvis and head-and-neck patient CT images were used for this study as virtual phantoms. Two data sets from each site were analyzed. The virtual phantoms were warped to create two pairs consisting of undeformed and deformed images. Otsu's method was employed to create additional segmented image pairs of n distinct soft tissue CT number ranges (fat, muscle, etc). A realistic noise image was added to each image. Deformations were applied in MIM Software (MIM) and Velocity deformable multi-pass (DMP) and compared with the known warping. Images with more simulated tissue levels exhibit more contrast, enabling more accurate results. Deformation error (magnitude of the vector difference between known and predicted deformation) was used as a metric to evaluate how many CT number gray levels are needed for a phantom to serve as a realistic patient proxy. Stabilization of the mean deformation error was reached by three soft tissue levels for Velocity DMP and MIM, though MIM exhibited a persisting difference in accuracy between the discrete images and the unprocessed image pair. A minimum detail of three levels allows a realistic patient proxy for use with Velocity and MIM deformation algorithms.

[1]  Tao Zhang,et al.  A Novel Method for Segmentation of CT Head Images , 2007, 2007 1st International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  Geoffrey G. Zhang,et al.  Intrathoracic tumour motion estimation from CT imaging using the 3D optical flow method. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  Vladimir Pekar,et al.  Assessment of a model-based deformable image registration approach for radiation therapy planning. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  Shao-Hu Peng,et al.  Texture feature extraction based on a uniformity estimation method for local brightness and structure in chest CT images , 2010, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[5]  J. Pouliot,et al.  The need for application-based adaptation of deformable image registration. , 2012, Medical physics.

[6]  N. Otsu A threshold selection method from gray level histograms , 1979 .

[7]  Benoît Macq,et al.  Comparison of 12 deformable registration strategies in adaptive radiation therapy for the treatment of head and neck tumors. , 2008, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[8]  Noriyuki Tomiyama,et al.  Automated assessment of malignant degree of small peripheral adenocarcinomas using volumetric CT data: correlation with pathologic prognostic factors. , 2010, Lung cancer.

[9]  L Dong,et al.  Quantification of accuracy of the automated nonlinear image matching and anatomical labeling (ANIMAL) nonlinear registration algorithm for 4D CT images of lung. , 2007, Medical physics.

[10]  Martin Styner,et al.  Automatic method to assess local CT-MR imaging registration accuracy on images of the head. , 2005, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[11]  Jan Seuntjens,et al.  A deformable phantom for 4D radiotherapy verification: design and image registration evaluation. , 2008, Medical physics.

[12]  Joe Y. Chang,et al.  Validation of an accelerated ‘demons’ algorithm for deformable image registration in radiation therapy , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  Jina Chang,et al.  Development of a deformable lung phantom for the evaluation of deformable registration , 2010, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[14]  Neil Kirby,et al.  Site-specific deformable imaging registration algorithm selection using patient-based simulated deformations. , 2013, Medical physics.

[15]  G. Allan Johnson,et al.  Left ventricle volume measurements in cardiac micro-CT: The impact of radiation dose and contrast agent , 2008, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[16]  Quan Chen,et al.  Objective assessment of deformable image registration in radiotherapy: A multi-institution study , 2008 .

[17]  R. Castillo,et al.  A framework for evaluation of deformable image registration spatial accuracy using large landmark point sets , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  C. Pelizzari,et al.  Evaluation of changes in the size and location of the prostate, seminal vesicles, bladder, and rectum during a course of external beam radiation therapy. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  Steve B Jiang,et al.  Implementation and evaluation of various demons deformable image registration algorithms on a GPU. , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.