Stimulus Coding Rules for Perceptual Learning

Perceptual learning of visual features occurs when multiple stimuli are presented in a fixed sequence (temporal patterning), but not when they are presented in random order (roving). This points to the need for proper stimulus coding in order for learning of multiple stimuli to occur. We examined the stimulus coding rules for learning with multiple stimuli. Our results demonstrate that: (1) stimulus rhythm is necessary for temporal patterning to take effect during practice; (2) learning consolidation is subject to disruption by roving up to 4 h after each practice session; (3) importantly, after completion of temporal-patterned learning, performance is undisrupted by extended roving training; (4) roving is ineffective if each stimulus is presented for five or more consecutive trials; and (5) roving is also ineffective if each stimulus has a distinct identity. We propose that for multi-stimulus learning to occur, the brain needs to conceptually “tag” each stimulus, in order to switch attention to the appropriate perceptual template. Stimulus temporal patterning assists in tagging stimuli and switching attention through its rhythmic stimulus sequence.

[1]  D Sagi,et al.  Where practice makes perfect in texture discrimination: evidence for primary visual cortex plasticity. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  M. Fahle Perceptual learning: specificity versus generalization , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[3]  A. Fiorentini,et al.  Perceptual learning specific for orientation and spatial frequency , 1980, Nature.

[4]  Karim Nader,et al.  Memory traces unbound , 2003, Trends in Neurosciences.

[5]  Misha Tsodyks,et al.  Associative learning in early vision , 2004, Neural Networks.

[6]  K. Fujii,et al.  Visualization for the analysis of fluid motion , 2005, J. Vis..

[7]  R. Stickgold,et al.  Memory consolidation and reconsolidation: what is the role of sleep? , 2005, Trends in Neurosciences.

[8]  E. Large,et al.  The dynamics of attending: How people track time-varying events. , 1999 .

[9]  S. Hochstein,et al.  The reverse hierarchy theory of visual perceptual learning , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  Shaul Hochstein,et al.  Learning pop-out detection: building representations for conflicting target-distractor relationships , 1998, Vision Research.

[11]  Aaron R. Seitz,et al.  Task-specific disruption of perceptual learning. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  R. Stickgold,et al.  Dissociable stages of human memory consolidation and reconsolidation , 2003, Nature.

[13]  J. D. McGaugh Memory--a century of consolidation. , 2000, Science.

[14]  D. Levi,et al.  Perceptual learning in vernier acuity: What is learned? , 1995, Vision Research.

[15]  Dov Sagi,et al.  A link between perceptual learning, adaptation and sleep , 2006, Vision Research.

[16]  Robert A Jacobs,et al.  Comparing perceptual learning tasks: a review. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[17]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  Task-specific disruption of perceptual learning. , 2005 .

[18]  M. Jones,et al.  Temporal Aspects of Stimulus-Driven Attending in Dynamic Arrays , 2002, Psychological science.

[19]  Barbara A Dosher,et al.  Perceptual learning retunes the perceptual template in foveal orientation identification. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[20]  Misha Tsodyks,et al.  Context-enabled learning in the human visual system , 2002, Nature.

[21]  Dennis M Levi,et al.  The essential role of stimulus temporal patterning in enabling perceptual learning , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  Thomas U. Otto,et al.  Perceptual learning with spatial uncertainties , 2006, Vision Research.

[23]  Thomas U. Otto,et al.  Perceptual learning of bisection stimuli under roving: slow and largely specific. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[24]  A. Karni,et al.  Dependence on REM sleep of overnight improvement of a perceptual skill. , 1994, Science.

[25]  Cong Yu,et al.  Perceptual learning in contrast discrimination and the (minimal) role of context. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[26]  Misha Tsodyks,et al.  Perceptual learning in contrast discrimination: the effect of contrast uncertainty. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[27]  Z L Lu,et al.  Perceptual learning reflects external noise filtering and internal noise reduction through channel reweighting. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Sleep-dependent learning: a nap is as good as a night , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  S. Hochstein,et al.  Task difficulty and the specificity of perceptual learning , 1997, Nature.

[30]  K. Rinoie,et al.  Flow field measurements of leading-edge separation vortex formed on a delta wing with vortex flaps , 2001 .