The effectiveness of blended online learning courses at the community college level

ABSTRACT Whether through the use of online-only or hybrid/blended formats, colleges and universities across the country are increasingly utilizing online platforms as a medium for the delivery of instruction. At the same time, we know little about how student learning outcomes are related to students’ engagement with online instructional formats. In particular, few studies have evaluated online learning in community colleges, and fewer yet have employed an experimental or quasi-experimental design to do so. In this research, we use propensity score matching to compare learning gains between community college students enrolled in blended courses, (courses that combine online instructional delivery with traditional classroom-based instruction) with gains experienced by students receiving only classroom-based instruction. Among students enrolled in blended courses, we also consider which aspects of student use of online instructional materials are most strongly associated with student learning. While some evidence has suggested significantly poorer outcomes for community college students enrolled in online-only courses, our results suggest that students enrolled in blended courses perform similarly, if not better, relative to students in a traditional instructional setting. Implications for practice and research are discussed.

[1]  Marsha C. Lovett,et al.  The Open Learning Initiative: Measuring the Effectiveness of the OLI Statistics Course in Accelerating Student Learning. , 2008 .

[2]  Shanna Smith Jaggars,et al.  Online Learning in the Virginia Community College System , 2010 .

[3]  J. Young "Hybrid" Teaching Seeks To End the Divide between Traditional and Online Instruction. , 2002 .

[4]  S. Baum,et al.  Bridging the higher education divide : strengthening community colleges and restoring the American Dream , 2013 .

[5]  Carol A. Zavarella,et al.  Instructional Delivery in Developmental Mathematics: Impact on Retention. , 2009 .

[6]  Charles R. Graham BLENDED LEARNING SYSTEMS: DEFINITION, CURRENT TRENDS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 2005 .

[7]  Barbara Means,et al.  Learning Online: What Research Tells Us About Whether, When and How , 2014 .

[8]  P. Austin An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies , 2011, Multivariate behavioral research.

[9]  Shanna Smith Jaggars,et al.  Adaptability to Online Learning: Differences across Types of Students and Academic Subject Areas. CCRC Working Paper No. 54. , 2013 .

[10]  Influences of Online Delivery on Developmental Writing Outcomes , 2004 .

[11]  Heather Staker,et al.  Classifying K-12 Blended Learning. , 2012 .

[12]  Rosina Smith A Synthesis of New Research on K-12 Online Learning , 2005 .

[13]  B. L. Bower,et al.  From correspondence to cyberspace: Changes and challenges in distance education , 2004 .

[14]  Elisabeth A. Barnett Validation Experiences and Persistence among Community College Students , 2010 .

[15]  Eileen B. Entin,et al.  Comparison of in-class and distance-learning students' performance and attitudes in an introductory computer science course , 2002 .

[16]  Kimberly C. Thornbury How College Affects Students: Volume 2 A Third Decade of Research , 2006 .

[17]  D. Rubin Using Propensity Scores to Help Design Observational Studies: Application to the Tobacco Litigation , 2001, Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology.

[18]  Shanna Smith Jaggars,et al.  Online Learning: Does It Help Low-Income and Underprepared Students? CCRC Working Paper No. 26. Assessment of Evidence Series. , 2011 .

[19]  Shanna Smith Jaggars,et al.  Online Learning: Does It Help Low-Income and Underprepared Students? CCRC Brief. Number 52. , 2011 .

[20]  B. Means,et al.  The Effectiveness of Online and Blended Learning: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature , 2013, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[21]  Laura I. Rendón Validating culturally diverse students: Toward a new model of learning and student development , 1994 .

[22]  Lori D. Patton,et al.  Dear Mr. Kozol…. Four African American Women Scholars and the Re-Authoring of Savage Inequalities , 2013, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[23]  Shanna Smith Jaggars,et al.  Effectiveness of Fully Online Courses for College Students: Response to a Department of Education Meta-Analysis , 2010 .

[24]  Beth Chance,et al.  ASSESSING STUDENTS’ CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING AFTER A FIRST COURSE IN STATISTICS , 2007 .

[25]  Ernest T. Pascarella,et al.  How college affects students , 1991 .

[26]  J. Barker,et al.  The Promising Role of Hybrid Learning in Community Colleges: Looking towards the Future. , 2014 .

[27]  Kelly A. Lack Current status of research on online learning in postsecondary education , 2013 .

[28]  Donna M. Desrochers,et al.  Trends in College Spending 1999-2009. Where Does the Money Come from? Where Does It Go? What Does It Buy? A Report of the Delta Cost Project. , 2010 .

[29]  Matthew M. Chingos,et al.  Interactive Learning Online at Public Universities: Evidence from a Six-Campus Randomized Trial. , 2014 .

[30]  David N. Figlio,et al.  Is It Live or Is It Internet? Experimental Estimates of the Effects of Online Instruction on Student Learning , 2010, Journal of Labor Economics.

[31]  David Ayers,et al.  Culturally Responsive Pedagogy and Online Learning: Implications for the Globalized Community College , 2006 .

[32]  David G. Brown Hybrid Courses Are Best. , 2001 .

[33]  John Watson,et al.  Blended Learning: The Convergence of Online and Face-to-Face Education. Promising Practices in Online Learning. , 2008 .

[34]  Shanna Smith Jaggars,et al.  Online and Hybrid Course Enrollment and Performance in Washington State Community and Technical Colleges , 2011 .

[35]  Vincent Tinto,et al.  Student Retention and Graduation: Facing the Truth, Living with the Consequences. Occasional Paper 1. , 2004 .

[36]  Barbara Ward,et al.  The Best of Both Worlds: A Hybrid Statistics Course , 2004 .