Enhanced Street Crossing Features are Associated with Higher Post-Stroke Physical Quality of Life

BACKGROUND Features of the physical environment may affect post-stroke recovery, but empirical evidence is limited. This study examines associations between features of the physical environment and post-stroke physical quality of life (PH-QOL). METHODS The study sample included stroke survivors enrolled in the Caring for Adults Recovering from the Effects of Stroke project, a prospective cohort. Features of the physical environment surrounding participants' home addresses were audited using Google Earth. Audits captured information about crossings (e.g. curb-cuts; range 0-4), street segments (e.g. sidewalks; range 0-17.5), and a route (e.g. parks; range 0-27) near participants' home. Summary scores were categorized into tertials representing "few," "some," and "many" pedestrian-friendly features. Post-stroke PH-QOL was measured by the SF-12 (range 0-100) around 6 to 12-, 18-, 27-, and 36-months post-stroke. Linear mixed models were used to estimate PH-QOL over time. Chained multiple imputation was used to account for missing data. RESULTS Two hundred and seventy-five participants were eligible, among whom 210 had complete data. Most participants lived in areas with "few" features to promote outdoor mobility. Participants living in environments with "some" crossing features had a 4.90 (95% CI: 2.32, 7.48) higher PH-QOL score across the observation period in comparison to participants living in environments with "few" crossing features. Features of the physical environment along street segments and routes were not associated with post-stroke PH-QOL. CONCLUSION Crossing features are associated with post-stroke PH-QOL. Modifying features of the physical environment at nearby crossings, such as curb-cuts, may be a promising strategy for increasing PH-QOL.

[1]  M. Weatherall,et al.  Estimating the minimal clinically important difference for the Physical Component Summary of the Short Form 36 for patients with stroke , 2021, The Journal of international medical research.

[2]  A. Woll,et al.  Effects of the built environment on physical activity: a systematic review of longitudinal studies taking sex/gender into account , 2020, Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine.

[3]  Yanbo Wang,et al.  Personalized accessible wayfinding for people with disabilities through standards and open geospatial platforms in smart cities , 2020, Open Geospatial Data, Software and Standards.

[4]  J. Teixeira,et al.  Environmental determinants of population health in urban settings. A systematic review , 2020, BMC Public Health.

[5]  Jylana L. Sheats,et al.  Employing Participatory Citizen Science Methods to Promote Age-Friendly Environments Worldwide , 2020, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[6]  Philippa Clarke,et al.  What features of the built environment matter most for mobility? Using wearable sensors to capture real-time outdoor environment demand on gait performance. , 2019, Gait & posture.

[7]  James F. Sallis,et al.  Online versus in-person comparison of Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes (MAPS) assessments: reliability of alternate methods , 2017, International Journal of Health Geographics.

[8]  Koen Putman,et al.  Long-term impact of stroke on patients’ health-related quality of life , 2017, Disability and rehabilitation.

[9]  Lawrence D Frank,et al.  Developing and Validating an Abbreviated Version of the Microscale Audit for Pedestrian Streetscapes (MAPS-Abbreviated). , 2017, Journal of transport & health.

[10]  E. Steultjens,et al.  What environmental factors influence resumption of valued activities post stroke: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative findings , 2016, Clinical rehabilitation.

[11]  R. Gottesman,et al.  The NIH Stroke Scale Has Limited Utility in Accurate Daily Monitoring of Neurologic Status , 2016, The Neurohospitalist.

[12]  Susan Magasi,et al.  Environmental barriers and supports to everyday participation: a qualitative insider perspective from people with disabilities. , 2015, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[13]  Lawrence D Frank,et al.  Development, scoring, and reliability of the Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes (MAPS) , 2013, BMC Public Health.

[14]  P. Clarke,et al.  Optimizing Mobility in Later Life: The Role of the Urban Built Environment for Older Adults Aging in Place , 2013, Journal of Urban Health.

[15]  Agneta Ståhl,et al.  How do people with cognitive functional limitations post-stroke manage the use of buses in local public transport? , 2012 .

[16]  Annie McCluskey,et al.  What people say about travelling outdoors after their stroke: a qualitative study. , 2012, Australian occupational therapy journal.

[17]  Jennifer A Ailshire,et al.  Participation among adults with disability: the role of the urban environment. , 2011, Social science & medicine.

[18]  D. Roth,et al.  Quality of life after stroke: a prospective longitudinal study , 2011, Quality of Life Research.

[19]  Patrick Royston,et al.  Avoiding bias due to perfect prediction in multiple imputation of incomplete categorical variables☆ , 2010, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[20]  Jennifer A Ailshire,et al.  Mobility disability and the urban built environment. , 2008, American journal of epidemiology.

[21]  Elena M Andresen,et al.  Original Contribution Neighborhood Conditions and Risk of Incident Lower-body Functional Limitations among Middle-aged African Americans , 2022 .

[22]  C. Moy,et al.  The Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke Study: Objectives and Design , 2005, Neuroepidemiology.

[23]  Jennifer L Balfour,et al.  Neighborhood environment and loss of physical function in older adults: evidence from the Alameda County Study. , 2002, American journal of epidemiology.

[24]  J. Ware,et al.  A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. , 1996, Medical care.