Upgrading extra corporeal life support to ECMELLA using Impella 5.0 in rescued INTERMACS 1 patients, lactate level matters!

Background Venoarterial extra corporeal life support (ECLS) is the treatment of choice of Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) class 1 patients, but left ventricle (LV) overload is a complication of ECLS. Unloading the LV by adding Impella 5.0 to ECLS in Impella used in combination with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMELLA) configuration is recommended only in patients with acceptable prognosis. We investigated whether serum lactate level, a simple biological parameter, could be used as a marker to select candidates for bridging from ECLS to ECMELLA. Methods Forty-one consecutive INTERMACS 1 patients under ECLS were upgraded to ECMELLA using Impella 5.0 pump implantation to unload the LV and were followed-up for 30 days. Demographic, clinical, imaging, and biological parameters were collected. Results The time between ECLS and Impella 5.0 pump implantation was 9 [0–30] hours. Among these 41 patients, 25 died 6±6 days after implantation. They were older (53±12 vs. 43±12 years, P=0.01) with acute coronary syndrome as the primary etiology (64% vs. 13%, P=0.0007). In univariate analysis, patients who died exhibited a lower mean arterial pressure (74±17 vs. 89±9 mmHg, P=0.01), a higher level of troponin (24,000±38,000 vs. 3,500±5,000 mg/dL, P=0.048), a higher level of serum lactate (8.3±7.4 vs. 4.2±3.8 mmol/L, P=0.05) and more frequent cardiac arrest at admission (80% vs. 25%, P=0.03). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, a serum lactate level of >7.9 mmol/L (P=0.008) was found to be an independent predictor of mortality. Conclusions In INTERMACS 1 patients who require urgent ECLS for restoring hemodynamics and organ perfusion, an upgrade from ECLS to ECMELLA is relevant if the serum lactate level is ≤7.9 mmol/L.

[1]  E. Potapov,et al.  Improving Survival in Cardiogenic Shock—A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of the Impact of an Institutional Allocation Protocol to Short-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support , 2022, Life.

[2]  D. Torella,et al.  Use of Impella device in cardiogenic shock and its clinical outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2022, International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature.

[3]  P. Guinot,et al.  Left ventricular unloading did not decrease mortality in cardiogenic shocks patients supported with VA-ECMO: A propensity score matching study. , 2022, Anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine.

[4]  L. Goldraich,et al.  Cardiogenic shock treated with temporary mechanical circulatory support in Brazil: The effect of learning curve , 2022, The International journal of artificial organs.

[5]  S. Duval,et al.  Axillary or Subclavian Impella 5.0 Support in Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis , 2021, ASAIO journal.

[6]  Zhigang Liu,et al.  Continuous-flow left ventricular assist device versus orthotopic heart transplantation in adults with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2021, Annals of cardiothoracic surgery.

[7]  Mhs,et al.  Outcomes of Hospitalizations for Cardiogenic Shock at Left Ventricular Assist Device Versus Non–Left Ventricular Assist Device Centers , 2020, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[8]  P. Kirchhof,et al.  Left Ventricular Unloading Is Associated With Lower Mortality in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Treated With Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , 2020, Circulation.

[9]  Seung‐Jung Park,et al.  Outcomes of left ventricular unloading with a transseptal cannula during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adults. , 2020, Artificial organs.

[10]  V. Falk,et al.  Prediction of survival of patients in cardiogenic shock treated by surgically implanted Impella 5+ short-term left ventricular assist device. , 2020, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

[11]  H. Reichenspurner,et al.  Bridging INTERMACS 1 patients from VA-ECMO to LVAD via Impella 5.0: De-escalate and ambulate. , 2020, Journal of critical care.

[12]  M. Matheny,et al.  Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation With Decreased Hospitalization and Mortality Risk After Cardiac Valve Surgery. , 2019, JAMA cardiology.

[13]  S. Blankenberg,et al.  Impella Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: Matched-Pair IABP-SHOCK II Trial 30-Day Mortality Analysis , 2019, Circulation.

[14]  A. Cheung,et al.  Outcomes of Impella 5.0 in Cardiogenic Shock , 2018, Innovations.

[15]  S. McGrane,et al.  Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Cardiogenic Shock. , 2018, JACC. Heart failure.

[16]  M. Slepian,et al.  Peripheral VA-ECMO with direct biventricular decompression for refractory cardiogenic shock , 2018, Perfusion.

[17]  Yeong-Hoon Choi,et al.  Lactate and lactate clearance as valuable tool to evaluate ECMO therapy in cardiogenic shock , 2017, Journal of critical care.

[18]  D. Brodie,et al.  Incidence and Implications of Left Ventricular Distention During Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support , 2017, ASAIO journal.

[19]  S. Blankenberg,et al.  Concomitant implantation of Impella® on top of veno‐arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation may improve survival of patients with cardiogenic shock , 2017, European journal of heart failure.

[20]  Kuo-Yang Huang,et al.  The modified SAVE score: predicting survival using urgent veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation within 24 hours of arrival at the emergency department , 2016, Critical Care.

[21]  P. Leprince,et al.  The ENCOURAGE mortality risk score and analysis of long-term outcomes after VA-ECMO for acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock , 2016, Intensive Care Medicine.

[22]  P. Leprince,et al.  Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Effects on Macrocirculation and Microcirculation in Cardiogenic Shock Patients Supported by Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation* , 2014, Critical care medicine.

[23]  C. Schmid,et al.  Cardiac Decompression on Extracorporeal Life Support: A Review and Discussion of the Literature , 2013, ASAIO journal.

[24]  Heather J Ross,et al.  Usefulness of the INTERMACS scale to predict outcomes after mechanical assist device implantation. , 2009, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.