Electromagnetically tracked personalized templates for surgical navigation

PurposeAn electromagnetic (EM) surgical tracking system was developed for orthopedic navigation. The reportedly poor accuracy of point-based EM navigation was improved by using anatomical impressions, which were EM-tracked personalized templates. Lines, rather than points, were consistently used for calibration and error evaluation.MethodsTechnical accuracy was tested using models derived from CT scans of ten cadaver shoulders. Tracked impressions were first designed, calibrated, and tested using lines as fiducial objects. Next, tracked impressions were tested against EM point-based navigation and optical point-based navigation, in environments that were either relatively empty or that included surgical instruments. Finally, a tracked impression was tested on a cadaver forearm in a simulated fracture-repair task.ResultsCalibration of anatomical impressions to EM tracking was highly accurate, with mean fiducial localization errors in positions of 0.3 mm and in angles of $$0.6^\circ $$0.6∘. Technical accuracy on physical shoulder models was also highly accurate; in an EM field with surgical instruments, the mean of target registration errors in positions was 2.2 mm and in angles was $$3.7^\circ $$3.7∘. Preclinical accuracy in a cadaver forearm in positions was 0.4 mm and in angles was $$7.1^\circ $$7.1∘. The technical accuracy was significantly better than point-based navigation, whether by EM tracking or by optical tracking. The preclinical accuracy was comparable to that achieved by point-based optical navigation.ConclusionsEM-tracked impressions—a hybrid of personalized templates and EM navigation—are a promising technology for orthopedic applications. The two technical contributions are the novel hybrid navigation and the consistent use of lines as fiducial objects, replacing traditional point-based computations. The accuracy improvement was attributed to the combination of physical surfaces and line directions in the processes of calibration and registration. The technical studies and preclinical trial suggest that EM-tracked impressions are an accurate, ergonomic innovation in image-guided orthopedic surgery.

[1]  K. S. Arun,et al.  Least-Squares Fitting of Two 3-D Point Sets , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[2]  Brian J Rasquinha,et al.  Comparing conventional and computer-assisted surgery baseplate and screw placement in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. , 2015, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[3]  Hans-Peter Meinzer,et al.  Pitfalls of electromagnetic tracking in clinical routine using multiple or adjacent sensors , 2013, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[4]  Georg Eggers,et al.  Accuracy assessment for navigated maxillo-facial surgery using an electromagnetic tracking device. , 2012, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[5]  A. James Stewart,et al.  Augmented Virtuality for Arthroscopic Knee Surgery , 2011, MICCAI.

[6]  Jan-Jakob Sonke,et al.  Comparing position and orientation accuracy of different electromagnetic sensors for tracking during interventions , 2015, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[7]  R. Ellis,et al.  Computer-assisted hip resurfacing using individualized drill templates. , 2010, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[8]  Gabor Fichtinger,et al.  Electromagnetic tracking in surgical and interventional environments: usability study , 2015, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[9]  Randy E. Ellis,et al.  Robust registration for computer-integrated orthopedic surgery: Laboratory validation and clinical experience , 2003, Medical Image Anal..

[10]  Helmar Bergmann,et al.  Design and application of an assessment protocol for electromagnetic tracking systems. , 2005, Medical physics.

[11]  Ian L. Dryden,et al.  Pivotal Bootstrap Methods for k-Sample Problems in Directional Statistics and Shape Analysis , 2007 .

[12]  Harald Essig,et al.  Model-based segmentation in orbital volume measurement with cone beam computed tomography and evaluation against current concepts , 2015, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[13]  Randy E. Ellis,et al.  The influence of osteophyte depiction in CT for patient-specific guided hip resurfacing procedures , 2015, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[14]  Nikhil Kulkarni,et al.  Minimizing Electromagnetic Interference from Surgical Instruments on Electromagnetic Surgical Navigation , 2010, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  Tapani Koivukangas,et al.  Technical accuracy of optical and the electromagnetic tracking systems , 2013, SpringerPlus.