Augmenting Cognition: Reviewing the Symbiotic Relation Between Man and Machine

One of the goals of augmented cognition is creation of adaptive human-machine collaboration that continually optimizes performance of the human-machine system. Augmented Cognition aims to compensate for temporal limitations in human information processing, for instance in the case of overload, cognitive lockup, and underload. Adaptive behavior, however, may also have undesirable side effects. The dynamics of adaptive support may be unpredictable and may lead to human factors problems such as mode errors, 'out-of-the-loop' problems, and trust related issues. One of the most critical challenges in developing adaptive human-machine collaboration concerns system mitigations. A combination of performance, effort and task information should be taken into account for mitigation strategies. This paper concludes with the presentation of an iterative cognitive engineering framework, which addresses the adaptation strategy of the human and machine in an appropriate manner carefully weighing the costs and benefits.

[1]  E. S. Conklin,et al.  A Comparison of the Scale of Values Method with the Order-of-Merit Method. , 1923 .

[2]  S S Stevens,et al.  HUMAN ENGINEERING FOR AN EFFECTIVE AIR-NAVIGATION AND TRAFFIC-CONTROL SYSTEM, AND APPENDIXES 1 THRU 3 , 1951 .

[3]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Human and Computer Control of Undersea Teleoperators , 1978 .

[4]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Engineering Psychology and Human Performance , 1984 .

[5]  Daniel Gopher,et al.  Workload: An examination of the concept. , 1986 .

[6]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction , 1988 .

[7]  J. Rassmusen,et al.  Information Processing and Human - Machine Interaction: An Approach to Cognitive Engineering , 1986 .

[8]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Handbook of perception and human performance , 1986 .

[9]  Keith Duncan,et al.  Cognitive Engineering , 2017, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[10]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  The Application of Human Factors to the Development of Expert Systems for Advanced Cockpits , 1987 .

[11]  Barry H. Kantowitz,et al.  3. Mental Workload , 1987 .

[12]  P. Hancock Human Factors Psychology , 1987 .

[13]  Barry H. Kantowitz,et al.  Mental Workload , 2020, Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine.

[14]  W. Rouse,et al.  An Architecture for Intelligent Interfaces: Outline of an Approach to Supporting Operators of Complex Systems , 1987, SGCH.

[15]  B. Rouse William,et al.  Adaptive Aiding for Human/Computer Control , 1988 .

[16]  P A Hancock,et al.  Pilot performance and preference for short cycles of automation in adaptive function allocation. , 1995, Applied ergonomics.

[17]  A. Pope,et al.  Biocybernetic system evaluates indices of operator engagement in automated task , 1995, Biological Psychology.

[18]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  The Out-of-the-Loop Performance Problem and Level of Control in Automation , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[19]  Mustapha Mouloua,et al.  Automation and Human Performance : Theory and Applications , 1996 .

[20]  Mustapha Mouloua,et al.  Effects of Adaptive Task Allocation on Monitoring of Automated Systems , 1996, Hum. Factors.

[21]  R. Parasuraman,et al.  Psychophysiology and adaptive automation , 1996, Biological Psychology.

[22]  Jefferson M. Koonce,et al.  Human–automation interaction: Research and practice. , 1997 .

[23]  J. Veltman,et al.  Physiological workload reactions to increasing levels of task difficulty. , 1998, Ergonomics.

[24]  Mustapha Mouloua,et al.  Automation Technology and Human Performance: Current Research and Trends , 1999 .

[25]  M R Endsley,et al.  Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[26]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation , 2000, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[27]  Toshiyuki Inagaki Situation-Adaptive Autonomy for Time-Critical Takeoff Decisions , 2000 .

[28]  N. Moray,et al.  Adaptive automation, trust, and self-confidence in fault management of time-critical tasks. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[29]  F. Freeman,et al.  A Closed-Loop System for Examining Psychophysiological Measures for Adaptive Task Allocation , 2000, The International journal of aviation psychology.

[30]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Function allocation: algorithm, alchemy or apostasy? , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[31]  Margareta Lützhöft,et al.  On Your Watch: Automation on the Bridge , 2002, Journal of Navigation.

[32]  Mark A. Neerincx,et al.  Cognitive task load analysis : Allocating tasks and designing support , 2003 .

[33]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  User Modeling in Human–Computer Interaction , 2001, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[34]  David B. Kaber,et al.  The effects of level of automation and adaptive automation on human performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task , 2004 .

[35]  Christopher A. Miller,et al.  Trust and etiquette in high-criticality automated systems , 2004, CACM.

[36]  Mark A. Neerincx,et al.  Integrating Human Factors and Artificial Intelligence in the Development of Human-Machine Cooperation , 2005, IC-AI.

[37]  J. A. Veltman,et al.  The Role of Operator State Assessment in Adaptive Automation , 2005 .

[38]  David B. Kaber,et al.  Effects of Automation of Information-Processing Functions on Teamwork , 2005, Hum. Factors.

[39]  David B. Kaber,et al.  Adaptive Automation of Human-Machine System Information-Processing Functions , 2005, Hum. Factors.

[40]  Mark W. Scerbo,et al.  Comparison of a Brain-Based Adaptive System and a Manual Adaptable System for Invoking Automation , 2006, Hum. Factors.

[41]  Neerincx,et al.  Optimizing cognitive task load in naval ship control centres: Design of an adaptive interface , 2006 .

[42]  A.,et al.  Cognitive Engineering , 2008, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[43]  E. Hollnagel Handbook of Cognitive Task Design , 2009 .

[44]  Mark W. Scerbo,et al.  Theoretical Perspectives on Adaptive Automation , 2019, Human Performance in Automated and Autonomous Systems.