Thermal comfort practices in the home and their impact on energy consumption

Existing theories have little to say about thermal comfort in the home. Most previous studies have focused on non-domestic buildings in which the occupants have limited opportunities to change the ambient environmental conditions. At home, people generally have greater freedom and, subject to the capabilities of the building and its systems, can decide and create conditions they consider comfortable. This paper reports on a detailed study of thermal comfort practices and energy consumption in different dwellings in South Wales using mixed methods to record physical conditions and householders' accounts of how and why they create those conditions. The methodology includes a robust form of thermal comfort survey that has enabled us to link reported comfort votes to measurements of prevailing environmental conditions. Householders also participated in in-depth interviews to describe how they maintain comfort in their everyday lives. This study reveals diverse time-varying profiles of thermal conditions, in which there are significant differences in temperatures in the main living spaces and in the temperature distribution, for example, between living rooms and bedrooms. It shows how householders develop a range of behaviours, skills and knowledge to create thermal conditions they consider acceptable rather than those predicted by conventional comfort theories.

[1]  Mitja Mazej,et al.  Thermal comfort: research and practice. , 2010, Frontiers in bioscience.

[2]  Sharafat Ali,et al.  Tropical summer index—a study of thermal comfort of Indian subjects , 1986 .

[3]  J. Stoops,et al.  Indoor Thermal Comfort, an Evolutionary Biology Perspective , 2006 .

[4]  P. Fanger Assessment of man's thermal comfort in practice , 1973, British journal of industrial medicine.

[5]  Michael A. Humphreys,et al.  Field studies of thermal comfort compared and applied , 1976 .

[6]  E. Shove,et al.  Comfort in a lower carbon society , 2008 .

[7]  Ben Matthews,et al.  From occupying to inhabiting - A change in conceptualising comfort , 2009 .

[8]  Thomas A. Markus,et al.  Buildings, climate, and energy , 1980 .

[9]  J. Stoops,et al.  A possible connection between thermal comfort and health , 2004 .

[10]  M. Hancock,et al.  Do people like to feel ‘neutral’?: Exploring the variation of the desired thermal sensation on the ASHRAE scale , 2007 .

[11]  Sarah Pink,et al.  Dirty laundry. Everyday practice, sensory engagement and the constitution of identity , 2005 .

[12]  Eric Helleiner,et al.  Subprime catalyst: Financial regulatory reform and the strengthening of US carbon market governance , 2013 .

[13]  P. Höppe Indoor climate , 2005, Experientia.

[14]  P. O. Fanger,et al.  Thermal comfort: analysis and applications in environmental engineering, , 1972 .

[15]  Nick Baker,et al.  The irritable occupant: recent developments in thermal comfort theory , 1996 .

[16]  Gail Brager,et al.  Developing an adaptive model of thermal comfort and preference , 1998 .

[17]  E. Shove Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience: The Social Organization of Normality , 2003 .

[18]  R. Dedear Developing an adaptive model of thermal comfort and preference , 1998 .

[19]  Michael A. Humphreys,et al.  ADAPTIVE THERMAL COMFORT AND SUSTAINABLE THERMAL STANDARDS FOR BUILDINGS , 2002 .

[20]  J. Busch A tale of two populations: thermal comfort in air-conditioned and naturally ventilated offices in Thailand , 1992 .

[21]  Yolande Strengers,et al.  Integrating health, housing and energy policies: social practices of cooling , 2011 .

[22]  Russell Hitchings Studying thermal comfort in context , 2009 .

[23]  Yolande Strengers,et al.  Comfort expectations: the impact of demand-management strategies in Australia , 2008 .