A Sustainable Approach for Hydraulic Control of Landfills Using Quarry Scalpings and Native Plants

Abstract Phytocovers have been proposed as an alternative to traditional barrier covers, with aims to improve long-term environmental performance and reduce the fi nancial burden of closure costs, particularly for rural landfi lls. This research is exploring the potential for a phytocover to be implemented at a landfi ll in southeast Australia. Opportunities exist at this site to use basalt quarry scalpings typical of the Victorian extractive industry for purposes of the cover substrate, while vegetation selection has focused on indigenous plant species. Although the agronomic properties of the scalpings are not ideal, preliminary planting trials have shown that the scalpings have signifi cant potential for sustaining a careful selection of native trees and grasses. The application of mulch has not resulted in any overall plant growth advantage. A compaction trial conducted with full-scale machinery has enabled the method of placing the scalpings to be related to the in-situ dry bulk density achieved. Performance of the designed phytocover profi le will be monitored with four large test sections. Two of the test sections will employ lysimetry for the direct collection of percolation, while the other two sections will remain open to the normal fl uxes of landfi ll gas, heat and water vapour present in the landfi ll environment in order to observe their effects on the establishing vegetation cover.

[1]  L. Norton,et al.  CLAY DISPERSION, INFILTRATION, AND EROSION AS INFLUENCED BY EXCHANGEABLE Ca AND Mg , 2002 .

[2]  T. Koen,et al.  Low input grasses useful in limiting environments (LIGULE) , 1999 .

[3]  S. Lolicato.  Soil water dynamics and growth of perennial pasture species for dryland salinity control. , 2000 .

[4]  M. Wong,et al.  Influence of landfill factors on plants and soil fauna-an ecological perspective. , 1997, Environmental pollution.

[5]  G. Zerbi,et al.  Germination and Initial Root Growth of Four Legumes as Affected by Landfill Biogas Atmosphere , 2000 .

[6]  Craig H. Benson,et al.  Examining the Alternatives , 2003 .

[7]  Kelly L. Madalinski,et al.  Evapotranspiration covers: An innovative approach to remediate and close contaminated sites , 2003 .

[8]  E. Aitchison,et al.  Landfill Capping with Woodland Ecosystems , 2001 .

[9]  Tina M. Stack,et al.  Putting Down Roots , 2018, Eliza Lucas Pinckney.

[10]  Anderson L. Ward,et al.  Performance Evaluation of a Field‐Scale Surface Barrier , 1997 .

[11]  Craig H. Benson,et al.  Field Evaluation of Alternative Earthen Final Covers , 2001 .

[12]  Jorge G. Zornberg,et al.  Analysis and design of evapotranspirative cover for hazardous waste landfill , 2003 .

[13]  Barron L. Weand,et al.  Natural Covers for Landfills and Buried Waste , 2001 .

[14]  C. Benson,et al.  Earthen Covers for Semi-Arid and Arid Climates , 1995 .

[15]  Tarek Abichou,et al.  Field water balance of landfill final covers. , 2004, Journal of environmental quality.

[16]  S. Prober,et al.  Identifying ecological barriers to restoration in temperate grassy woodlands: soil changes associated with different degradation states , 2002 .

[17]  Jianhua Zhang,et al.  Can differences in root responses to soil drying and compaction explain differences in performance of trees growing on landfill sites? , 1999, Tree physiology.

[18]  P. Attiwill,et al.  Forest Soils and Nutrient Cycles , 1987 .

[19]  R. Keren.  Specific Effect of Magnesium on Soil Erosion and Water Infiltration , 1991 .

[20]  G. Saul,et al.  Maximising the use of soil water by herbaceous species in the high rainfall zone of southern Australia: a review , 2003 .