Cardiovascular disease risk assessment innovative approaches developed in HeartCycle project

Two innovative CVD event risk assessment strategies were developed in the scope of HeartCycle project: i) combination of individual risk assessment tools; ii) personalization of risk assessment based on grouping of patients. These approaches aimed to defeat some of the major limitations of the tools currently applied in the daily clinical practice, namely to: i) improve the risk prediction performance when comparing it to the one achieved by the individual current risk assessment tools; ii) consider the available knowledge provided by other risk assessment tools; iii) cope with missing risk factors; iv) incorporate additional clinical knowledge. Two different real patients' datasets were applied to validate the developed strategies: i) Santa Cruz Hospital, Portugal, N=460 ACS-NSTEMI1 patients; ii) Leiria Pombal Hospital Centre, Portugal, N=99 ACS-NSTEMI. Based on the gathered results, we propose a new strategy in order to improve patients' stratification.

[1]  Jorge Henriques,et al.  Improvement of CVD risk assessment tools' performance through innovative patients' grouping strategies , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[2]  Nir Friedman,et al.  Bayesian Network Classifiers , 1997, Machine Learning.

[3]  Jiawei Han,et al.  Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques , 2000 .

[4]  Peter Herbison,et al.  Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) hospital discharge risk score accurately predicts long-term mortality post acute coronary syndrome. , 2007, American heart journal.

[5]  R. Suganya,et al.  Data Mining Concepts and Techniques , 2010 .

[6]  Joep Perk [New European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention]. , 2012, Lakartidningen.

[7]  Shah Ebrahim,et al.  European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: executive summary: Fourth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (Constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invit , 2007, European heart journal.

[8]  E W Steyerberg,et al.  Predictors of outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST-segment elevation. Results from an international trial of 9461 patients. The PURSUIT Investigators. , 2000, Circulation.

[9]  Shah Ebrahim,et al.  European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Third Joint Task Force of European and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice. , 2003 .

[10]  Shah Ebrahim,et al.  European Guidelines on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (Version 2012) , 2012, International Journal of Behavioral Medicine.

[11]  D. Lloyd‐Jones,et al.  Cardiovascular risk prediction: basic concepts, current status, and future directions. , 2010, Circulation.

[12]  Nicos Maglaveras,et al.  HeartCycle: Compliance and effectiveness in HF and CAD closed-loop management , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[13]  Eric O. Postma,et al.  Dimensionality Reduction: A Comparative Review , 2008 .

[14]  Jorge Henriques,et al.  Fusion of risk assessment models with application to coronary artery disease patients , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[15]  E. Antman,et al.  The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI: A method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making. , 2000, JAMA.