Wood in sustainable construction - a material perspective: Learning from vernacular architecture

Aalto University, P.O. Box 11000, FI-00076 Aalto www.aalto.fi Author Atsushi Takano Name of the doctoral dissertation Wood in sustainable construction a material perspective Learning from vernacular architecture Publisher School of Chemical Technology Unit Department of Forest Products Technology Series Aalto University publication series DOCTORAL DISSERTATIONS 97/2015 Field of research Wood Material Technology / Wood Architecture Manuscript submitted 1 April 2015 Date of the defence 4 September 2015 Permission to publish granted (date) 23 June 2015 Language English Monograph Article dissertation (summary + original articles) Abstract Traditionally, vernacular buildings were constructed based upon a deep understanding of the surroundings and the features of locally sourced materials. This wisdom led to a rational building composition and appropriate material selection, which ensured adequate living conditions and proper building life cycle, without any advanced technologies. In the discussion about reducing the environmental impacts of a building, there should be useful ideas to be taken from traditional solutions for the further development of modern buildings. A life cycle perspective is nowadays becoming more significant for comprehensive building analysis as the distribution of the environmental impacts over a building life cycle change. In such a context, building material selection is an important factor. Wood products have lately attracted attention as promising construction materials due to their unique environmental properties. This study investigated the optimal use and development of wood products in sustainable construction in comparison to other building materials, based on life cycle assessment method. With regard to learning from vernacular buildings, a holistic analysis of wood in construction was carried out. In this dissertation, first the methodological issues relating to the fair assessment of wood products and wood construction based on the current normative standards and assessment data were discussed. Secondly, wood in sustainable construction was discussed according to ten principles in terms of appropriate building material selection over the building life cycle. This study demonstrated that there are both strengths and weakness to the use of wood in sustainable construction. In this sense, the importance of diverse perspectives to building materials has been highlighted. It was also discussed that wood may contribute to the environment more positively when it is used more. A reduction in consumption (e.g. energy) and emissions (e.g. CO2) has thus far been the principle behind mitigating environmental impacts. In this context, for instance, a CLT (Cross laminated timber) framed building would not be preferable since it requires a large amount of wood, resulting in high embodied energy. However, on the other hand, that gives significant environmental benefits (e.g. energy recovery) to the building. In this case, by optimising the weaknesses (high embodied energy) and maximising the strengths (environmental benefits), the greater use of wood may improve the environmental profile of a building. This would be a paradigm shift from the current approach to the environmental problems. In that sense, wood seems to have significant potential. It would be important to consider a specific approach and use for wood in construction based upon the proper understanding of their characteristics as practiced in traditional buildings.Traditionally, vernacular buildings were constructed based upon a deep understanding of the surroundings and the features of locally sourced materials. This wisdom led to a rational building composition and appropriate material selection, which ensured adequate living conditions and proper building life cycle, without any advanced technologies. In the discussion about reducing the environmental impacts of a building, there should be useful ideas to be taken from traditional solutions for the further development of modern buildings. A life cycle perspective is nowadays becoming more significant for comprehensive building analysis as the distribution of the environmental impacts over a building life cycle change. In such a context, building material selection is an important factor. Wood products have lately attracted attention as promising construction materials due to their unique environmental properties. This study investigated the optimal use and development of wood products in sustainable construction in comparison to other building materials, based on life cycle assessment method. With regard to learning from vernacular buildings, a holistic analysis of wood in construction was carried out. In this dissertation, first the methodological issues relating to the fair assessment of wood products and wood construction based on the current normative standards and assessment data were discussed. Secondly, wood in sustainable construction was discussed according to ten principles in terms of appropriate building material selection over the building life cycle. This study demonstrated that there are both strengths and weakness to the use of wood in sustainable construction. In this sense, the importance of diverse perspectives to building materials has been highlighted. It was also discussed that wood may contribute to the environment more positively when it is used more. A reduction in consumption (e.g. energy) and emissions (e.g. CO2) has thus far been the principle behind mitigating environmental impacts. In this context, for instance, a CLT (Cross laminated timber) framed building would not be preferable since it requires a large amount of wood, resulting in high embodied energy. However, on the other hand, that gives significant environmental benefits (e.g. energy recovery) to the building. In this case, by optimising the weaknesses (high embodied energy) and maximising the strengths (environmental benefits), the greater use of wood may improve the environmental profile of a building. This would be a paradigm shift from the current approach to the environmental problems. In that sense, wood seems to have significant potential. It would be important to consider a specific approach and use for wood in construction based upon the proper understanding of their characteristics as practiced in traditional buildings.

[1]  James A. Fava,et al.  Will the Next 10 Years be as Productive in Advancing Life Cycle Approaches as the Last 15 Years? , 2006 .

[2]  Li Zhu,et al.  Detailed Energy Saving Performance Analyses on Thermal Mass Walls Demonstrated in a Zero Energy House , 2009 .

[3]  Ambrose Dodoo,et al.  Life cycle primary energy use and carbon emission of residential buildings , 2011 .

[4]  Tomas Nord Prefabrication Strategies in the Timber Housing Industry Case studies from Swedish and Austrian markets , 2008 .

[5]  Carey J. Simonson,et al.  Moisture buffering capacity of hygroscopic building materials: Experimental facilities and energy impact , 2006 .

[6]  Abdol R. Chini,et al.  Research Article: Grading and Strength of Salvaged Lumber from Residential Buildings , 2001 .

[7]  S. Gheewala,et al.  A matrix in life cycle perspective for selecting sustainable materials for buildings in Sri Lanka , 2009 .

[8]  Catarina Thormark,et al.  A low energy building in a life cycle - its embodied energy, energy need for operation and recycling potential , 2002 .

[9]  Bjørn Berge,et al.  Salvageability of building materials , 2007 .

[10]  Peter Walker,et al.  Building houses with local materials: means to drastically reduce the environmental impact of construction , 2001 .

[11]  Raymond J. Cole,et al.  Energy and greenhouse gas emissions associated with the construction of alternative structural systems , 1998 .

[12]  Catarina Thormark,et al.  The effect of material choice on the total energy need and recycling potential of a building , 2006 .

[13]  Roger Sathre,et al.  Life-Cycle Energy and Carbon Implications of Wood-Based Products and Construction , 2007 .

[14]  Masahiko Karube,et al.  Present state of wood waste recycling and a new process for converting wood waste into reusable wood materials : Environmental benign manufacturing and material processing toward dematerialization , 2002 .

[15]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  Cascade utilization of biomass: strategies for a more efficient use of a scarce resource , 2000 .

[16]  Guoliang Liu,et al.  Long-term forest management and timely transfer of carbon into wood products help reduce atmospheric carbon , 2009 .

[17]  Anna Joelsson,et al.  Primary energy efficiency and CO2 mitigation in residential buildings , 2008 .

[18]  David Lee,et al.  ENERNET: Studying the dynamic relationship between building occupancy and energy consumption , 2012 .

[19]  Kozo Kanayama,et al.  Recycling of wood waste as sustainable industrial resources—Design of energy saving wood-based board for floor heating systems , 2006 .

[20]  Ravi Prakash,et al.  Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: An overview , 2010 .

[21]  Raymond J. Cole,et al.  Life-cycle energy use in office buildings , 1996 .

[22]  Susan Selke,et al.  Critical aspects in the life cycle assessment (LCA) of bio-based materials – Reviewing methodologies and deriving recommendations , 2013 .

[23]  Fredrik Ståhl,et al.  Influence of thermal mass on the heating and cooling demands of a building unit , 2009 .

[24]  Catarina Thormark,et al.  Recycling Potential and Design for Disassembly in Buildings , 2001 .

[25]  E. Peereboom,et al.  Influence of Inventory Data Sets on Life‐Cycle Assessment Results: A Case Study on PVC , 1998 .

[26]  Chris R. Hennigar,et al.  A novel approach to optimize management strategies for carbon stored in both forests and wood products , 2008 .

[27]  Kei Tanaka,et al.  RECYCLING OF TIMBERS FROM WOODEN HOUSE BY HANDWORKED DEMOLITION SYSTEM , 2003 .

[28]  Michael D. Lepech,et al.  Application of life-cycle assessment to early stage building design for reduced embodied environmental impacts , 2013 .

[29]  Rolf Frischknecht,et al.  Notions on the Design and Use of an Ideal Regional or Global LCA Database , 2006 .

[30]  S. Sasayama,et al.  Effects of Wooden and Vinyl Interior Finishes on Stress Reduction , 2009 .

[31]  Hugo Hens,et al.  Life cycle inventory of buildings: A contribution analysis , 2010 .

[32]  Ambrose Dodoo,et al.  Effect of thermal mass on life cycle primary energy balances of a concrete- and a wood-frame building , 2012 .

[33]  A. Horvath CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS AND THE ENVIRONMENT , 2004 .

[34]  John D. Quale,et al.  Construction Matters: Comparing Environmental Impacts of Building Modular and Conventional Homes in the United States , 2012 .

[35]  Naoko Tojo,et al.  Europe as a Recycling Society. European Recycling Policies in relation to the actual , 2011 .

[36]  Juha Jokisalo,et al.  Effect of the thermal inertia and other building and HVAC factors on energy performance and thermal comfort in Finnish apartment buildings , 2005 .

[37]  M. Scharai-Rad,et al.  Environmental and energy balances of wood products and substitutes. , 2002 .

[38]  L. D. Danny Harvey,et al.  Reducing energy use in the buildings sector: measures, costs, and examples , 2009 .

[39]  Lester B. Lave,et al.  NEW MARKETS FOR OLD MATERIALS , 1996 .

[40]  O. Guerra Santin,et al.  Occupant behaviour in energy efficient dwellings: evidence of a rebound effect , 2013 .

[41]  Stéphane Hameury,et al.  Contribution of indoor exposed massive wood to a good indoor climate: in situ measurement campaign , 2004 .

[42]  Martin Belusko,et al.  Minimising the life cycle energy of buildings: Review and analysis , 2014 .

[43]  E. Gaygısız,et al.  The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) , 2022 .

[44]  Mariko Yamasaki,et al.  Strength Properties of Aged Wood III : Static and impact bending strength properties of aged keyaki and akamatsu woods , 2005 .

[45]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Energy and carbon balances of wood cascade chains , 2006 .

[46]  José A. Orosa,et al.  Energy saving with passive climate control methods in Spanish office buildings , 2009 .

[47]  Mariko Yamasaki,et al.  Strength properties of aged wood, 2: Compressive strength properties, shearing strength and hardness of aged keyaki [Zelkova serrata] and akamatsu [Pinus denshiflora] woods , 2004 .

[48]  Mathias Borg,et al.  Generic LCA-methodology applicable for buildings, constructions and operation services: today practice and development needs , 2003 .

[49]  Gabriele Weber-Blaschke,et al.  Potentials for cascading of recovered wood from building deconstruction—A case study for south-east Germany , 2013 .

[50]  Gloria P. Gerilla,et al.  An environmental assessment of wood and steel reinforced concrete housing construction , 2007 .

[51]  Frank Werner,et al.  Carbon pool and substitution effects of an increased use of wood in buildings in Switzerland: first estimates , 2005 .

[52]  P. Börjesson,et al.  Greenhouse gas balances in building construction : wood versus concrete from life-cycle and forest land-use perspectives , 2000 .

[53]  L. Gustavsson,et al.  Variability in energy and carbon dioxide balances of wood and concrete building materials , 2006 .

[54]  Catarina Thormark Environmental analysis of a building with reused building materials , 2000 .

[55]  R. Frischknecht,et al.  Implementation of Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methods. ecoinvent report No. 3, v2.2 , 2010 .

[56]  Anne Grete Hestnes,et al.  Energy use in the life cycle of conventional and low-energy buildings: A review article , 2007 .

[57]  Sebastian Rüter,et al.  Ökobilanz-Basisdaten für Bauprodukte aus Holz , 2012 .

[58]  Constantinos A. Balaras,et al.  The role of thermal mass on the cooling load of buildings. An overview of computational methods , 1996 .

[59]  Bruno Peuportier,et al.  Life cycle assessment applied to the comparative evaluation of single family houses in the French context , 2001 .

[60]  Gregory A. Keoleian,et al.  Life cycle energy and environmental performance of a new university building: modeling challenges and design implications , 2003 .

[61]  Thomas Lützkendorf,et al.  A life cycle approach to buildings: Principles - Calculations - Design tools , 2010 .

[62]  Mariko Yamasaki,et al.  MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE USED WOOD RECYCLED FROM OLD TEMPLES , 2005 .

[63]  Philip Crowther Design for disassembly : an architectural strategy for sustainability , 2003 .