Conceptual, Spatial, and Cue Learning in the Morris Water Maze in Fast or Slow Kindling Rats: Attention Deficit Comorbidity

Rat lines selectively bred for differences in amygdala excitability, manifested by “fast” or “slow” kindling epileptogenesis, display several comorbid features related to anxiety and learning. To assess the nature of the learning deficits in fast kindling rats, performance was evaluated in several variants of a Morris water-maze test. Regardless of whether the location of the platform was fixed or varied over days (matching-to-place task), the fast rats displayed inferior performance, suggesting both working and reference memory impairments. Furthermore, when the position of the platform was altered after the response was acquired, fast rats were more persistent in emitting the previously acquired response. The poor performance of fast rats was also evident in both cued and uncued tasks, indicating that their disturbed learning was not simply a reflection of a spatial deficit. Moreover, fast rats could be easily distracted by irrelevant cues, suggesting that these animals suffered from an attentional disturbance. Interestingly, when rats received several training trials with the platform elevated, permitting them to develop the concept of facile escape, the performance of fast rats improved greatly. The performance disturbance in fast rats may reflect difficulties in forming a conceptual framework under conditions involving some degree of ambiguity, as well as greater distractibility by irrelevant cues. These various attributes of the fast rats may serve as a potentially useful animal model of disorders characterized by an attention deficit.

[1]  R. Morris.  Synaptic plasticity and learning: selective impairment of learning rats and blockade of long-term potentiation in vivo by the N-methyl-D- aspartate receptor antagonist AP5 , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[2]  D. Cain,et al.  Spatial learning without NMDA receptor-dependent long-term potentiation , 1995, Nature.

[3]  H. Anisman,et al.  Influence of Psychogenic and Neurogenic Stressors on Endocrine and Immune Activity: Differential Effects in Fast and Slow Seizing Rat Strains , 1997, Brain, Behavior, and Immunity.

[4]  S. Parmigiani,et al.  Selection, evolution of behavior and animal models in behavioral neuroscience , 1999, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[5]  J. Hall,et al.  Detailed behavioral analysis of water maze acquisition under APV or CNQX: contribution of sensorimotor disturbances to drug-induced acquisition deficits. , 1996, Behavioral neuroscience.

[6]  O. Lindvall,et al.  Seizure-induced differential expression of messenger RNAs for neurotrophins and their receptors in genetically fast and slow kindling rats , 1996, Neuroscience.

[7]  R. Morris,et al.  Distinct components of spatial learning revealed by prior training and NMDA receptor blockade , 1995, Nature.

[8]  Mona K. Otnæss,et al.  Pretraining Prevents Spatial Learning Impairment after Saturation of Hippocampal Long-Term Potentiation , 1999, Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  D. Mcintyre,et al.  Differential Expression of α1, α2, α3, and α5 GABAA Receptor Subunits in Seizure-Prone and Seizure-Resistant Rat Models of Temporal Lobe Epilepsy , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  I. Whishaw,et al.  Immediate and long-lasting effects of MK-801 on motor activity, spatial navigation in a swimming pool and EEG in the rat , 2004, Psychopharmacology.

[11]  D. Overstreet,et al.  Selectively Bred Lines of Rats Differ in Social Interaction and Hippocampal 5-HT1A Receptor Function: A Link Between Anxiety and Depression? , 1998, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[12]  B. Dudek,et al.  Selective breeding, congenic strains, and other classical genetic approaches to the analysis of alcohol-related polygenic pleiotropisms , 1993, Behavior genetics.

[13]  H. Anisman,et al.  Differential impact of predator or immobilization stressors on central corticotropin-releasing hormone and bombesin-like peptides in Fast and Slow seizing rat , 2001, Brain Research.

[14]  H. Eichenbaum,et al.  The Neurophysiology of Memory , 2000, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[15]  D. Cain,et al.  Testing hypotheses of spatial learning: the role of NMDA receptors and NMDA-mediated long-term potentiation , 1997, Behavioural Brain Research.

[16]  D. Kennaway,et al.  Emergence of altered circadian timing in a cholinergically supersensitive rat line. , 1999, American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology.

[17]  R. Morris,et al.  Impaired spatial learning after saturation of long-term potentiation. , 1998, Science.

[18]  H. Anisman,et al.  Acoustic startle and fear‐potentiated startle in rats selectively bred for fast and slow kindling rates: relation to monoamine activity , 2000, The European journal of neuroscience.

[19]  J. Takahashi,et al.  Forward and reverse genetic approaches to behavior in the mouse. , 1994, Science.

[20]  G. Lynch,et al.  Selective impairment of learning and blockade of long-term potentiation by an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, AP5 , 1986, Nature.

[21]  I. Whishaw,et al.  Rats with fimbria-fornix lesions display a place response in a swimming pool: a dissociation between getting there and knowing where , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[22]  Ian Q. Whishaw,et al.  Formation of a place learning-set by the rat: A new paradigm for neurobehavioral studies , 1985, Physiology & Behavior.

[23]  I. Whishaw.  Dissociating performance and learning deficits on spatial navigation tasks in rats subjected to cholinergic muscarinic blockade , 1989, Brain Research Bulletin.

[24]  D. Mcintyre,et al.  Amygdala kindling-resistant (SLOW) or -prone (FAST) rat strains show differential fear responses. , 1998, Behavioral Neuroscience.

[25]  J. Crawley.  Behavioral phenotyping of transgenic and knockout mice: experimental design and evaluation of general health, sensory functions, motor abilities, and specific behavioral tests 1 Published on the World Wide Web on 2 December 1998. 1 , 1999, Brain Research.

[26]  R. Racine,et al.  Development of kindling-prone and kindling-resistant rats: selective breeding and electrophysiological studies , 1999, Epilepsy Research.

[27]  N. K. Sandnabba,et al.  Selective breeding for isolation-induced intermale aggression in mice: associated responses and environmental influences. , 1996, Behavior genetics.

[28]  D. Cain,et al.  Complex Behavioral Strategy and Reversal Learning in the Water Maze without NMDA Receptor-Dependent Long-Term Potentiation , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  H. Anisman,et al.  Influence of psychogenic and neurogenic stressors on neuroendocrine and central monoamine activity in fast and slow kindling rats , 1999, Brain Research.

[30]  S. Faraone,et al.  The nature and heritability of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. , 2001, Child and adolescent psychiatric clinics of North America.

[31]  D. Mcintyre,et al.  FAST and SLOW amygdala kindling rat strains: comparison of amygdala, hippocampal, piriform and perirhinal cortex kindling , 1999, Epilepsy Research.

[32]  O. Lindvall,et al.  Epileptogenesis induced by rapidly recurring seizures in genetically fast- but not slow-kindling rats , 1998, Brain Research.

[33]  S. Wolf,et al.  Behavior disturbance, phenobarbital, and febrile seizures. , 1978, Pediatrics.

[34]  J. N. P. Rawlins,et al.  The effects of hippocampal lesions upon spatial and non-spatial tests of working memory , 1986, Behavioural Brain Research.