Dynamical model of long-term synaptic plasticity

Long-term synaptic plasticity leading to enhancement in synaptic efficacy (long-term potentiation, LTP) or decrease in synaptic efficacy (long-term depression, LTD) is widely regarded as underlying learning and memory in nervous systems. LTP and LTD at excitatory neuronal synapses are observed to be induced by precise timing of pre- and postsynaptic events. Modification of synaptic transmission in long-term plasticity is a complex process involving many pathways; for example, it is also known that both forms of synaptic plasticity can be induced by various time courses of Ca2+ introduction into the postsynaptic cell. We present a phenomenological description of a two-component process for synaptic plasticity. Our dynamical model reproduces the spike time-dependent plasticity of excitatory synapses as a function of relative timing between pre- and postsynaptic events, as observed in recent experiments. The model accounts for LTP and LTD when the postsynaptic cell is voltage clamped and depolarized (LTP) or hyperpolarized (LTD) and no postsynaptic action potentials are evoked. We are also able to connect our model with the Bienenstock, Cooper, and Munro rule. We give model predictions for changes in synaptic strength when periodic spike trains of varying frequency and Poisson distributed spike trains with varying average frequency are presented pre- and postsynaptically. When the frequency of spike presentation exceeds ≈30–40 Hz, only LTP is induced.

[1]  E. Bienenstock,et al.  Theory for the development of neuron selectivity: orientation specificity and binocular interaction in visual cortex , 1982, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[2]  H. Wigström,et al.  Hippocampal long-term potentiation is induced by pairing single afferent volleys with intracellularly injected depolarizing current pulses. , 1986, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[3]  S. Kelso,et al.  Hebbian synapses in hippocampus. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  R. Malinow,et al.  Postsynaptic hyperpolarization during conditioning reversibly blocks induction of long-term potentiation , 1986, Nature.

[5]  C. Stevens,et al.  Presynaptic mechanism for long-term potentiation in the hippocampus , 1990, Nature.

[6]  T. Bliss,et al.  A synaptic model of memory: long-term potentiation in the hippocampus , 1993, Nature.

[7]  R. Morris.  Foundations of cellular neurophysiology , 1996 .

[8]  Charles F Stevens,et al.  Long-Term Depression Properties in a Simple System , 1996, Neuron.

[9]  H. Markram,et al.  Regulation of Synaptic Efficacy by Coincidence of Postsynaptic APs and EPSPs , 1997, Science.

[10]  James P. Keener,et al.  Mathematical physiology , 1998 .

[11]  G. Bi,et al.  Synaptic Modifications in Cultured Hippocampal Neurons: Dependence on Spike Timing, Synaptic Strength, and Postsynaptic Cell Type , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  D. Linden.  The Return of the Spike Postsynaptic Action Potentials and the Induction of LTP and LTD , 1999, Neuron.

[13]  D. Debanne,et al.  Heterogeneity of Synaptic Plasticity at Unitary CA3–CA1 and CA3–CA3 Connections in Rat Hippocampal Slice Cultures , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  R. Zucker,et al.  Selective induction of LTP and LTD by postsynaptic [Ca2+]i elevation. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  R. Zucker.  Calcium- and activity-dependent synaptic plasticity , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[16]  R. Nicoll,et al.  Long-term potentiation--a decade of progress? , 1999, Science.

[17]  V. Han,et al.  Synaptic plasticity in the mormyrid electrosensory lobe. , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[18]  P. Lánský,et al.  Long-term potentiation and depression induced by a stochastic conditioning of a model synapse. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[19]  Mark C. W. van Rossum,et al.  Stable Hebbian Learning from Spike Timing-Dependent Plasticity , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  L. Abbott,et al.  Synaptic plasticity: taming the beast , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  D. Feldman,et al.  Timing-Based LTP and LTD at Vertical Inputs to Layer II/III Pyramidal Cells in Rat Barrel Cortex , 2000, Neuron.

[22]  D. Wilkin,et al.  Neuron , 2001, Brain Research.

[23]  P. J. Sjöström,et al.  Rate, Timing, and Cooperativity Jointly Determine Cortical Synaptic Plasticity , 2001, Neuron.

[24]  G. Bi,et al.  Synaptic modification by correlated activity: Hebb's postulate revisited. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[25]  L. Cooper,et al.  A biophysical model of bidirectional synaptic plasticity: Dependence on AMPA and NMDA receptors , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  C. Holmgren,et al.  Coincident Spiking Activity Induces Long-Term Changes in Inhibition of Neocortical Pyramidal Cells , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  Y. Dan,et al.  Spike-timing-dependent synaptic modification induced by natural spike trains , 2002, Nature.