Lessons on Measuring e-Government Satisfaction: An Experience from Surveying Government Agencies in the UK

This paper summarises lessons learned in relation to an ongoing study to collect feedback on e-government systems that have been implemented to e-enable several core administrative functions in the UK as part of the I-MEET project. Previous work summarises findings from surveys of users of such systems and this paper reports on the experience of surveying providers. An extensive survey was designed and administered to explore provider perspectives on the e-government application in general, system aspects, cost, implementation, prerequisites (e.g. policy support), various dimensions of effects, and the respondent's overall opinion of the system. The survey found a complex mix of internal and external contacted service providers and commissioners, each of whom has a different set of success measures for a service, and shared services (such as common web site providers) that were not obvious but could result in correlated observations. These findings provide signposts for future researchers to potential pitfalls. Nevertheless, when complete, the integration by the I-MEET project of user and provider perspectives will give policy makers the opportunity to balance the scale, complexity and expense of electronically delivered transactions on the government side with the usability and satisfaction from the user perspective, revealing linkages between aspects of both.

[1]  Habin Lee,et al.  A user satisfaction study of the NHS Online Prescription Prepayment Certificate , 2014 .

[2]  Vishanth Weerakkody,et al.  The University of Bradford Institutional Repository , 2022 .

[3]  Namjoo Choi,et al.  Reducing the Perceived Risk of E-Government Implementations: The Importance of Risk Communication , 2010, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[4]  France Bélanger,et al.  The utilization of e‐government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors * , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[5]  Hakikur Rahman,et al.  Handbook of Research on E-Government Readiness for Information and Service Exchange: Utilizing Progressive Information Communication Technologies , 2009 .

[6]  U. Kumar,et al.  International Journal of Electronic Government Research: Guest editorial preface , 2011 .

[7]  Ephrem Eyob,et al.  E-government: breaking the frontiers of inefficiencies in the public sector , 2004, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[8]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Research note: Toward a reference process model for citizen‐oriented evaluation of e‐Government services , 2008 .

[9]  A. Solanas,et al.  Smart Government: Opportunities and Challenges in Smart Cities Development , 2015 .

[10]  Zahir Irani,et al.  E-government implementation: A bird’s eye view of issues relating to costs, opportunities, benefits and risks , 2013, Information Systems Frontiers.

[11]  Bernhard Seliger E-Government in a Federal State: The Case of the Introduction of E-Government in Germany in the Early 2000s , 2010 .

[12]  Vishanth Weerakkody,et al.  E-government adoption: A cultural comparison , 2008, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[13]  Vishanth Weerakkody,et al.  The Use of Wireless Internet Parks to Facilitate Adoption and Diffusion of E-Government Services: An Empirical Study in Qatar , 2008, AMCIS.

[14]  Vishanth Weerakkody,et al.  Conceptualizing E-Inclusion in Europe: An Explanatory Study , 2012, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[15]  Eugene Santos,et al.  I-FGM as a Real Time Information Retrieval Tool for E-Governance , 2008, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[16]  M. J. Moon,et al.  Linking Citizen Satisfaction with E-Government and Trust in Government , 2004 .

[17]  Ejub Kajan,et al.  Handbook of Research on Democratic Strategies and Citizen-Centered E-Government Services , 2014 .