Methodology for estimating availability of cloud-free image composites: A case study for southern Canada

Abstract Image composites are often used for earth surface phenomena studies at regional or national level. The compromise between residual clouds and the length of compositing period is a necessary corollary to the choice of satellite optical data for monitoring earth surface phenomena dynamics. This paper introduced a methodology for estimating availability of cloud-free image composites for optical sensors with various revisiting intervals, using MODIS MOD06 L2 cloud fraction product in the period of 2000–2008. The methodology starts with downscaling of the cloud fraction product to 1 km × 1 km cloud cover binary images. The binary images are then used for the exploration of spatial and temporal characteristics of cloud dynamics, and subsequently for the simulation of cloud-free composite availability with various revisiting intervals of optical sensors. Using Canada's southern provinces as an application case, the study explored several factors important for the design of environmental monitoring system using optical sensors of earth observation, in particular, cloud dynamics and its inter-annual variability, sensors’ revisiting intervals, and cloud-free threshold for targeting composites. While the cloud images used in the analysis are at 1 km × 1 km resolution, our analysis suggests that the simulated availabilities of cloud-free image composites may also provide reasonable estimates for optical sensors with higher than 1 km × 1 km resolution, though the closer to 1 km × 1 km resolution the optical sensor, the more pertinent the application. Also, the methodology can be parameterised to different temporal period and different spatial region, depending on applications.

[1]  W. Paul Menzel,et al.  The MODIS cloud products: algorithms and examples from Terra , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[2]  Sylvain G. Leblanc,et al.  Leaf area index mapping in northern Canada , 2011 .

[3]  J. Morisette,et al.  Quantifying the impact of cloud obscuration on remote sensing of active fires in the Brazilian Amazon , 2008 .

[4]  R. A. Roebeling,et al.  Estimating surface solar irradiance from METEOSAT SEVIRI-derived cloud properties , 2008 .

[5]  W. G. Rees,et al.  The spatial and temporal effect of cloud cover on the acquisition of high quality landsat imagery in the European Arctic sector , 1994 .

[6]  Chong-yu Xu.  From GCMs to river flow: a review of downscaling methods and hydrologic modelling approaches , 1999 .

[7]  Stefan Dech,et al.  Remote sensing of snow – a review of available methods , 2012 .

[8]  J. Morcrette,et al.  Comparison of model‐generated and satellite‐derived cloud cover and radiation budget , 1988 .

[9]  J. Chen.  Optically-based methods for measuring seasonal variation of leaf area index in boreal conifer stands , 1996 .

[10]  G. Asner,et al.  Spatial and temporal probabilities of obtaining cloud‐free Landsat images over the Brazilian tropical savanna , 2007 .

[11]  Richard Fernandes,et al.  Daily snow cover estimation from Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer Polar Pathfinder data over Northern Hemisphere land surfaces during 1982-2004 , 2009 .

[12]  J. Cihlar.  Identification of contaminated pixels in AVHRR composite images for studies of land biosphere , 1996 .

[13]  Samuel N. Goward,et al.  Landsat 7's long-term acquisition plan — an innovative approach to building a global imagery archive , 2001 .

[14]  B. Hewitson,et al.  Climate downscaling: techniques and application , 1996 .

[15]  Remote sensing of Canadian boreal forest fires: hotspots, burned area, and smoke plumes , 1999, IEEE 1999 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. IGARSS'99 (Cat. No.99CH36293).

[16]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Generation of a novel 1 km NDVI data set over Canada, the northern United States, and Greenland based on historical AVHRR data , 2012 .

[17]  Hayley J. Fowler,et al.  Linking climate change modelling to impacts studies: recent advances in downscaling techniques for hydrological modelling , 2007 .

[18]  R. Bindschadler,et al.  The Landsat Image Mosaic of Antarctica , 2008 .

[19]  Robert H. Fraser,et al.  Deriving stand age distribution in boreal forests using SPOT VEGETATION and NOAA AVHRR imagery , 2004 .

[20]  P. Mote,et al.  Review of scenario selection and downscaling methods for the assessment of climate change impacts on hydrology in the United States pacific northwest , 2007 .

[21]  Qinghan Xiao,et al.  Land cover classification with AVHRR multichannel composites in northern environments , 1996 .

[22]  Michael E. Schaepman,et al.  Algorithm theoretical basis document , 2009 .

[23]  Cloud frequency with respect to remote sensing applications: example of Bavaria, southern Germany , 2005 .

[24]  T. Wigley,et al.  Downscaling general circulation model output: a review of methods and limitations , 1997 .

[25]  Cloud cover statistics and their use in the planning of remote sensing missions , 1970 .

[26]  B. Leblon.  Monitoring Forest Fire Danger with Remote Sensing , 2005 .

[27]  D. Roy,et al.  The availability of cloud-free Landsat ETM+ data over the conterminous United States and globally , 2008 .

[28]  W. Verhoef,et al.  Leaf area index estimation with MODIS reflectance time series and model inversion during full rotations of Eucalyptus plantations , 2011 .

[29]  F. Sunar,et al.  Forest fire analysis with remote sensing data , 2001 .

[30]  Yi Luo,et al.  Developing clear-sky, cloud and cloud shadow mask for producing clear-sky composites at 250-meter spatial resolution for the seven MODIS land bands over Canada and North America , 2008 .

[31]  G. Gutman,et al.  Towards better quality of AVHRR composite images over land: Reduction of cloud contamination , 1994 .

[32]  Julien Boé,et al.  Statistical and dynamical downscaling of the Seine basin climate for hydro‐meteorological studies , 2007 .