Teamwork Online: The Effects of Computer Conferencing on Perceived Confusion, Satisfaction, and Postdiscussion Accuracy

This study investigated the impact of computer-mediated communication on teamwork by examining 40 4-person teams working in either face-to-face or computer conferencing environments. Results were consistent with the belief that computer-mediated teams have trouble maintaining mutual knowledge. Compared with their face-to-face counterparts, computer-mediated teams viewed their discussions as more confusing and less satisfying, spent more time devising decisions, and felt less content with their outcomes. Discussion time mediated the relationship between the communication medium and outcome satisfaction. Confusion and outcome dissatisfaction predicted inaccuracies when members independently recorded team decisions; accordingly, the electronic communication medium reduced decision recording accuracy. By clarifying several shortcomings associated with computer conferencing, these results can be used to inform choices when selecting and developing effective team communication media.

[1]  G. Keppel,et al.  Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook , 1976 .

[2]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Joining Together: Group Theory and Group Skills , 1975 .

[3]  C. O'Reilly,et al.  Relationships among components of credibility and communication behaviors in work units. , 1976 .

[4]  S. Green,et al.  The effects of three social decision schemes on decision group process , 1980 .

[5]  N. Smith.  Mutual Knowledge , 1982 .

[6]  B. Webber,et al.  Elements of Discourse Understanding , 1983 .

[7]  Sara Kiesler,et al.  Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication , 1984 .

[8]  Wendy Samter,et al.  DECISION‐MAKING PROCEDURE AND DECISION QUALITY , 1984 .

[9]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  S. R. Hiltz,et al.  Experiments in group decision making: Communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. , 1986 .

[11]  Philip Yetton,et al.  Improving Group Performance by Training in Individual Problem Solving , 1987 .

[12]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group and computer-mediated discussion effects in risk decision making. , 1987 .

[13]  Michael T. Vanecek,et al.  Computer conferencing and task-oriented decisions: Implications for group decision support , 1988, Inf. Manag..

[14]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Computer Support for Meetings of Groups Working on Unstructured Problems: A Field Experiment , 1988, MIS Q..

[15]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Experiments in group decision making, 3: disinhibition, deindividuation, and group process in pen name and real name computer conferences , 1989, Decis. Support Syst..

[16]  N. Archer.  A comparison of computer conferences with face-to-face meetings for small group business decisions , 1990 .

[17]  J. Walther,et al.  Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction , 1990 .

[18]  Susan R. Fussell,et al.  Mutual knowledge and communicative effectiveness , 1990 .

[19]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work , 1990 .

[20]  James D. McKeen,et al.  Enhancing Computer-Mediated Communication: An experimental investigation into the use of a Group Decision Support System for face-to-face versus remote meetings , 1990, Inf. Manag..

[21]  Michael T. Vanecek,et al.  Dispersed Group Decision Making Using Nonsimultaneous Computer Conferencing: A Report of Research , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[22]  L. Adrianson,et al.  Group processes in face-to-face and computer-mediated communication , 1991 .

[23]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Grounding in communication , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[24]  Sara B. Kiesler,et al.  The Equalization Phenomenon: Status Effects in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Decision-Making Groups , 1991, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[25]  R. Gallupe,et al.  Unblocking brainstorms. , 1991, The Journal of applied psychology.

[26]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  Perspectives on socially shared cognition , 1991 .

[27]  G. Keppel.  Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook, 3rd ed. , 1991 .

[28]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group decision making and communication technology , 1992 .

[29]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  ELECTRONIC BRAINSTORMING AND GROUP SIZE , 1992 .

[30]  S. Weisband.  Group discussion and first advocacy effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision making groups , 1992 .

[31]  Poppy Lauretta McLeod,et al.  An Assessment of the Experimental Literature on Electronic Support of Group Work: Results of a Meta-Analysis , 1992, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[32]  Steven G. Rogelberg,et al.  The Stepladder Technique: An Alternative Group Structure Facilitating Effective Group Decision Making , 1992 .

[33]  Susan R. Fussell,et al.  Coordination of knowledge in communication: effects of speakers' assumptions about what others know. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  Bonita L. Daly,et al.  The influence of face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication channels on collective induction , 1993 .

[35]  J. McGrath,et al.  Groups Interacting with Technology: Ideas, Evidence, Issues and an Agenda , 1993 .

[36]  J. McGrath,et al.  Group Task Performance and Communication Technology , 1993 .

[37]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Joining together: Group theory and group skills, 5th ed. , 1994 .

[38]  Susan G. Straus,et al.  Does the medium matter? The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions. , 1994, The Journal of applied psychology.

[39]  Charles R. Schwenk,et al.  Devil's Advocacy and Dialectical Inquiry Effects on Face-to-Face and Computer-Mediated Group Decision Making , 1995 .

[40]  R. Hightower,et al.  The impact of computer-mediated communication systems on biased group discussion , 1995 .

[41]  William N. Dilla,et al.  Judgment Accuracy and Outcomes in Negotiation: A Causal Modeling Analysis of Decision-Aiding Effects , 1995 .

[42]  A. Hollingshead.  The Rank-Order Effect in Group Decision Making , 1996 .

[43]  Laku Chidambaram,et al.  Relational Development in Computer-Supported Groups , 1996, MIS Q..

[44]  Bolanle A. Olaniran,et al.  A model of group satisfaction in computer-mediated communication and face-to-face meetings , 1996, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[45]  Susan G. Straus,et al.  Getting a Clue , 1996 .

[46]  Merrill Warkentin,et al.  Virtual Teams versus Face-to-Face Teams: An Exploratory Study of a Web-based Conference System* , 1997 .

[47]  Jane M. Carey,et al.  The Impact of Communication Mode and Task Complexity on Small Group Performance and Member Satisfaction. , 1997 .

[48]  Robert S. Baron,et al.  The eyes have it : Minority influence in face-to-face and computer-mediated group discussion , 1997 .

[49]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Information exchange and use in GSS and verbal group decision making: effects of minority influence , 1997, Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[50]  Michael D. Coovert,et al.  The influences of communication media and decision-making technique on team decision outcomes: a critical assessment of the stepladder approach , 1997, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[51]  P. Bordia.  Face-to-Face Versus Computer-Mediated Communication: A Synthesis of the Experimental Literature , 1997 .

[52]  Steven G. Rogelberg,et al.  Extending the stepladder technique: An examination of self-paced stepladder groups. , 1998 .

[53]  Gayle J. Yaverbaum,et al.  Asynchronous Computer-mediated Communication versus Face-to-face Collaboration: Results on Student Learning, Quality and Satisfaction , 1999 .

[54]  Wei Huang,et al.  Compensating effects of GSS on group performance , 1999, Inf. Manag..

[55]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Impacts of Asynchronous Learning Networks on Individual and Group Problem Solving: A Field Experiment , 1999 .

[56]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions , 2000 .

[57]  Jill M. Purdy,et al.  THE IMPACT OF COMMUNICATION MEDIA ON NEGOTIATION OUTCOMES , 2000 .

[58]  David A. Hofmann,et al.  Multilevel Analytical Techniques: Commonalties, Differences, and Continuing Questions. , 2000 .

[59]  C. Cramton.  The Mutual Knowledge Problem and Its Consequences for Dispersed Collaboration , 2001 .

[60]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Group Support Systems: A Descriptive Evaluation of Case and Field Studies , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[61]  E.,et al.  GROUPS : INTERACTION AND PERFORMANCE , 2001 .

[62]  Richard E. Potter,et al.  Virtual team interaction styles: assessment and effects , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[63]  B. Baltes,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication and Group Decision Making: A Meta-Analysis , 2002 .

[64]  Michael D. Coovert,et al.  Stepping up to the challenge: A critical examination of face-to-face and computer-mediated team decision making. , 2002 .