Output-only modal identification with limited sensors using sparse component analysis

Abstract Blind source separation (BSS) based methods have been shown to be efficient and powerful to perform output-only modal identification. Existing BSS modal identification methods, however, require the number of sensors at least equal to that of sources (active modes). This paper proposes a new modal identification algorithm based on a novel BSS technique termed sparse component analysis (SCA) to handle even the underdetermined problem where sensors may be highly limited compared to the number of active modes. The developed SCA method reveals the essence of modal expansion that the monotone modal responses with disjoint sparsest representations in frequency domain naturally cluster in the directions of the mode matrix's columns (modeshapes), which are readily extracted from the measured system responses using a simple clustering algorithm. Then, in determined case where sensor number equals that of modes, the estimated square mode matrix directly decouples the system responses to obtain the modal responses, whereby computing their frequencies and damping ratios; whereas with limited sensors, the modal responses are efficiently recovered via the l 1 -minimization sparse recovery technique from the incomplete knowledge of the partial mode matrix and the system responses of inadequate sensors. Numerical simulations and experimental example show that whether in determined or underdetermined situations, the SCA method performs accurate and robust identification of a wide range of structures including those with closely-spaced and highly-damped modes. The SCA method is simple and efficient to conduct reliable output-only modal identification even with limited sensors.

[1]  Yongchao Yang,et al.  Blind identification of damage in time-varying systems using independent component analysis with wavelet transform , 2014 .

[2]  Aswin C. Sankaranarayanan,et al.  Compressive Sensing , 2008, Computer Vision, A Reference Guide.

[3]  R.G. Baraniuk,et al.  Compressive Sensing [Lecture Notes] , 2007, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[4]  Balas K. Natarajan,et al.  Sparse Approximate Solutions to Linear Systems , 1995, SIAM J. Comput..

[5]  Michael Zibulevsky,et al.  Underdetermined blind source separation using sparse representations , 2001, Signal Process..

[6]  James C. Bezdek,et al.  Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms , 1981, Advanced Applications in Pattern Recognition.

[7]  S. Narasimhan,et al.  Decentralized modal identification using sparse blind source separation , 2011 .

[8]  Mahesh D. Pandey,et al.  Modified Cross-Correlation Method for the Blind Identification of Structures , 2010 .

[9]  E.J. Candes,et al.  An Introduction To Compressive Sampling , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[10]  Gaëtan Kerschen,et al.  Output-only modal analysis using blind source separation techniques , 2007 .

[11]  David L Donoho,et al.  Compressed sensing , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[12]  M. Hulle Clustering approach to square and non-square blind source separation , 1999 .

[13]  Scott Rickard,et al.  Blind separation of speech mixtures via time-frequency masking , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[14]  Khalid Sayood,et al.  Introduction to Data Compression , 1996 .

[15]  Rune Brincker,et al.  Modal identification of output-only systems using frequency domain decomposition , 2001 .

[16]  Budhaditya Hazra,et al.  Underdetermined Blind Identification of Structures by Using the Modified Cross-Correlation Method , 2012 .

[17]  Yehoshua Y. Zeevi,et al.  A Multiscale Framework For Blind Separation of Linearly Mixed Signals , 2003, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[18]  D. Chelidze,et al.  Blind source separation based vibration mode identification , 2007 .

[19]  S. Mallat A wavelet tour of signal processing , 1998 .

[20]  Jer-Nan Juang,et al.  An eigensystem realization algorithm for modal parameter identification and model reduction. [control systems design for large space structures] , 1985 .

[21]  Michael Elad,et al.  From Sparse Solutions of Systems of Equations to Sparse Modeling of Signals and Images , 2009, SIAM Rev..

[22]  Eric Moulines,et al.  A blind source separation technique using second-order statistics , 1997, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[23]  E. Candes,et al.  11-magic : Recovery of sparse signals via convex programming , 2005 .

[24]  D. C. Zimmerman,et al.  A framework for blind modal identification using joint approximate diagonalization , 2008 .

[25]  Poul Henning Kirkegaard,et al.  Special issue on Operational Modal Analysis , 2010 .

[26]  Scot McNeill Extending Blind Modal Identification to the Underdetermined Case for Ambient Vibration , 2012 .

[27]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System Identification: Theory for the User , 1987 .

[28]  W. Staszewski IDENTIFICATION OF DAMPING IN MDOF SYSTEMS USING TIME-SCALE DECOMPOSITION , 1997 .

[29]  Michael A. Saunders,et al.  Atomic Decomposition by Basis Pursuit , 1998, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[30]  Rémi Gribonval,et al.  A survey of Sparse Component Analysis for blind source separation: principles, perspectives, and new challenges , 2006, ESANN.

[31]  N. Huang,et al.  System identification of linear structures based on Hilbert–Huang spectral analysis. Part 1: normal modes , 2003 .

[32]  Barak A. Pearlmutter,et al.  Blind Source Separation by Sparse Decomposition in a Signal Dictionary , 2001, Neural Computation.

[33]  Fabian J. Theis,et al.  Sparse component analysis and blind source separation of underdetermined mixtures , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[34]  Erkki Oja,et al.  Independent component analysis: algorithms and applications , 2000, Neural Networks.

[35]  Michael Elad,et al.  Optimally sparse representation in general (nonorthogonal) dictionaries via ℓ1 minimization , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  David J. Ewins,et al.  Modal Testing: Theory, Practice, And Application , 2000 .

[37]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[38]  Satish Nagarajaiah,et al.  Output only modal identification and structural damage detection using time frequency & wavelet techniques , 2009 .

[39]  Bart De Moor,et al.  Numerical algorithms for state space subspace system identification , 1993 .

[40]  B. Peeters,et al.  Stochastic System Identification for Operational Modal Analysis: A Review , 2001 .

[41]  Ertugrul Taciroglu,et al.  Response‐only modal identification of structures using limited sensors , 2013 .

[42]  Joseph Lardies,et al.  Identification of modal parameters using the wavelet transform , 2002 .

[43]  Biswajit Basu,et al.  Identification of modal parameters of a mdof system by modified L–P wavelet packets , 2006 .

[44]  Jean-Claude Golinval,et al.  Physical interpretation of independent component analysis in structural dynamics , 2007 .

[45]  D. Donoho For most large underdetermined systems of linear equations the minimal 𝓁1‐norm solution is also the sparsest solution , 2006 .

[46]  Yongchao Yang,et al.  Time-Frequency Blind Source Separation Using Independent Component Analysis for Output-Only Modal Identification of Highly Damped Structures , 2013 .