Image invariance with changes in size: the role of peripheral contrast thresholds.

The appearance of objects generally does not change with changes in the size of their retinal image that occur as the distance from the observer increases or decreases. Contrast constancy ensures this invariance for suprathreshold image features, but fully robust size invariance also requires invariance at threshold, so that near-threshold image features do not appear or disappear with distance changes. Since the angular size and the eccentricity of image features covary with distance changes, the threshold requirement for invariance could be satisfied approximately if contrast thresholds were to vary as the product of the spatial frequency and the eccentricity from the fovea. This model fits contrast thresholds for orientation identification over spatial frequencies of 1-16 cycles/deg and for retinal eccentricities of as much as 23 deg. Contrast detection thresholds from six different studies conform to this model over an even wider range of spatial frequencies and retinal eccentricities. The fitting variable, the fundamental eccentricity constant, was similar for all three studies that measured detection along the horizontal meridian and was higher for the orientation identification contrast thresholds along the same meridian. The eccentricity constant from studies that measured detection along the vertical meridian was higher than the constant calculated for the horizontal meridian and lower than the eccentricity constant for chromatic isoluminance gratings. Our model and these results provide new tools for analyzing the visibility of displays and for designing equal-visibility or variable-visibility displays.

[1]  N. Sutherland.  Outlines of a theory of visual pattern recognition in animals and man , 1968, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[2]  S M Anstis,et al.  Letter: A chart demonstrating variations in acuity with retinal position. , 1974, Vision research.

[3]  R Hilz,et al.  Functional organization of the peripheral retina: sensitivity to periodic stimuli. , 1974, Vision research.

[4]  G. Skinner,et al.  X-ray outburst from the direction of the galactic centre , 1975, Nature.

[5]  ARTHUR P. GINSBURG,et al.  Is the illusory triangle physical or imaginary? , 1975, Nature.

[6]  M. Georgeson,et al.  Contrast constancy: deblurring in human vision by spatial frequency channels. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  J. Kulikowski,et al.  Effective contrast constancy and linearity of contrast sensation , 1976, Vision Research.

[8]  Tyler Cw,et al.  Is the illusory triangle physical or imaginary , 1977 .

[9]  Arthur P Ginsburg,et al.  Visual Information Processing Based on Spatial Filters Constrained by Biological Data. , 1978 .

[10]  Chris A. Johnson,et al.  Effects of target size and eccentricity on visual detection and resolution , 1978, Vision Research.

[11]  G. J. van der Wildt,et al.  Contrast sensitivity as a function of position on the retina , 1980, Vision Research.

[12]  J. Robson,et al.  Probability summation and regional variation in contrast sensitivity across the visual field , 1981, Vision Research.

[13]  C H Anderson,et al.  Spatially inhomogeneous scaled transforms for vision and pattern recognition. , 1981, Optics letters.

[14]  P. Cavanagh.  Size Invariance: Reply to Schwartz , 1981, Perception.

[15]  Andrew M. Derrington,et al.  Pattern discrimination with flickering stimuli , 1981, Vision Research.

[16]  E L Schwartz,et al.  Cortical Anatomy, Size Invariance, and Spatial Frequency Analysis , 1981, Perception.

[17]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Microcomputer-based estimation of psychophysical thresholds: The Best PEST , 1982 .

[18]  D Regan,et al.  Visual fields described by contrast sensitivity, by acuity, and by relative sensitivity to different orientations. , 1983, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[19]  C Braccini.  Scale-invariant image processing by means of scaled transforms or form-invariant, linear shift-variant filters. , 1983, Optics letters.

[20]  R. Hess,et al.  Contrast-coding in amblyopia. I. Differences in the neural basis of human amblyopia , 1983, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[21]  C. R. Carlson,et al.  Theory of shape-invariant imaging systems. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[22]  Ingo Rentschler,et al.  Loss of spatial phase relationships in extrafoveal vision , 1985, Nature.

[23]  M S Banks,et al.  The development of contrast constancy. , 1985, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[24]  J P Thomas,et al.  Detection and identification: how are they related? , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[25]  M. Cannon,et al.  Perceived contrast in the fovea and periphery. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[26]  M C Morrone,et al.  Recognition of Positive and Negative Bandpass-Filtered Images , 1986, Perception.

[27]  E Peli,et al.  Reading with a macular scotoma. II. Retinal locus for scanning text. , 1987, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[28]  Wilson S. Geisler,et al.  The physical limits of grating visibility , 1987, Vision Research.

[29]  J P Thomas,et al.  Effect of eccentricity on the relationship between detection and identification. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[30]  Joel Norman,et al.  Spatial frequency filtering and target identification , 1987, Vision Research.

[31]  M A García-Pérez.  Space-variant visual processing: spatially limited visual channels. , 1988, Spatial vision.

[32]  Yehoshua Y. Zeevi,et al.  Pyramidal Image Representation In Nonuniform Systems , 1988, Other Conferences.

[33]  B. Kȩdzia.  [Contrast sensitivity function of the visual system]. , 1988, Klinika oczna.

[34]  Yehezkel Yeshurun,et al.  Shape Description with a Space-Variant Sensor: Algorithms for Scan-Path, Fusion, and Convergence Over Multiple Scans , 2015, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[35]  R. F. Hess,et al.  The contrast sensitivity gradient across the human visual field: With emphasis on the low spatial frequency range , 1989, Vision Research.

[36]  The contrast sensitivity gradient across the major oblique meridians of the human visual field , 1990, Vision Research.

[37]  E. Peli.  Contrast in complex images. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[38]  G. Sperling,et al.  Object spatial frequencies, retinal spatial frequencies, noise, and the efficiency of letter discrimination , 1991, Vision Research.

[39]  K. Mullen,et al.  Colour vision as a post-receptoral specialization of the central visual field , 1991, Vision Research.

[40]  I. Rentschler,et al.  Contrast thresholds for identification of numeric characters in direct and eccentric view , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.