Dilemmas of counter-mapping community resources in Tanzania

Recent work has celebrated the political potential of ‘counter-mapping’, that is, mapping against dominant power structures, to further seemingly progressive goals. This article briefly reviews the counter-mapping literature, and compares four counter-mapping projects from Maasai areas in Tanzania to explore some potential pitfalls in such efforts. The cases, which involve community-based initiatives led by a church-based NGO, ecotourism companies, the Tanzanian National Parks Authority, and grassroots pastoralist rights advocacy groups, illustrate the broad range of activities grouped under the heading of counter-mapping. They also present a series of political dilemmas that are typical of many counter-mapping efforts: conflicts inherent in conservation efforts involving territorialization, privatization, integration and indigenization; problems associated with the theory and practice of ‘community-level’ political engagement; the need to combine mapping efforts with broader legal and political strategies; and critical questions involving the agency of ‘external’ actors such as conservation and development donors, the state and private business interests.

[1]  Matthew Sparke,et al.  A Map that Roared and an Original Atlas: Canada, Cartography, and the Narration of Nation , 1998 .

[2]  D. Hodgson Once Intrepid Warriors: Gender, Ethnicity, and the Cultural Politics of Maasai Development , 2001 .

[3]  Organization and Development , 1972 .

[4]  Peter J. Poole,et al.  Indigenous peoples, mapping and biodiversity conservation : an analysis of current activities and opportunities for applying geomatics technologies , 1995 .

[5]  D. Rocheleau,et al.  Gendered resource mapping: Focusing on women's spaces in the landscape , 1994 .

[6]  R. Neumann LOCAL CHALLENGES TO GLOBAL AGENDAS: CONSERVATION, ECONOMIC LIBERALIZATION AND THE PASTORALISTS' RIGHTS MOVEMENT IN TANZANIA , 1995 .

[7]  A. Tsing,et al.  Representing communities: Histories and politics of community‐based natural resource management , 1998 .

[8]  K. M. Homewood,et al.  Maasailand Ecology: Pastoralist Development and Wildlife Conservation in Ngorongoro, Tanzania , 1993 .

[9]  P. Peters,et al.  Maps, Metaphors, and Meanings: Boundary Struggles and Village Forest Use on Private and State Land in Malawi , 2001 .

[10]  Kevin St. Martin,et al.  Making Space for Community Resource Management in Fisheries , 2001 .

[11]  D. Hodgson Critical interventions: Dilemmas of accountability in contemporary ethnographic research , 1999 .

[12]  Robert A. Rundstrom GIS, Indigenous Peoples, and Epistemological Diversity , 1995 .

[13]  Jeff Fox,et al.  Mapping the Commons: The Social Context of Spatial Information Technologies , 1998 .

[14]  D. Brockington,et al.  Pastoral Land Tenure and Community Conservation: a case study from North-East Tanzania , 1999 .

[15]  C. Eghenter,et al.  Mapping peoples' forests : the role of mapping in planning community based management of conservation areas in Indonesia , 2000 .

[16]  N. Peluso WHOSE WOODS ARE THESE? COUNTER‐MAPPING FOREST TERRITORIES IN KALIMANTAN, INDONESIA , 1995 .

[17]  D. Rocheleau,et al.  Women, Men and Trees: Gender, Power and Property in Forest and Agrarian Landscapes , 1997 .

[18]  J. L. Berntsen The Enemy Is Us: Eponymy in the Historiography of the Maasai , 1980, History in Africa.

[19]  R. A. Schroeder,et al.  Shady Practices: Agroforestry and Gender Politics in the Gambia , 1999 .

[20]  J. Pickles Ground truth : the social implications of geographic information systems , 1995 .

[21]  M. I. Aguilar,et al.  Being Maasai: Ethnicity and Identity in East Africa , 1993 .

[22]  R. A. Schroeder,et al.  Geographies of environmental intervention in Africa , 1999 .