Reactive Control for Transmission Overload Relief Based on Sensitivity Analysis and Cooperative Game Theory

Under overload conditions, corrective actions must be carried out in a short time in order to avoid blackouts. However, the control of system facilities in the new market environment has changed the standard overload relief procedures, resulting in high costs for the transmission system operator. To address this issue, an overload relief procedure based on reactive power control applicable to small disturbances is presented. Corrective actions are determined by linearizing the system parameters around the initial operating point in order to calculate the minimum cost for every possible combination of the selected reactive devices. The local nature of reactive power allows us to reduce the set of devices to be used, which speeds up the process and make it suitable for real-time applications. An analysis based on cooperative game theory solutions illustrates the economic aspects of the proposed procedure. Extensive tests have been conducted with the IEEE 118-bus test system and with the Interconnected Brazilian System (SIN), in which a real situation that took place in the summer of 2006 is presented, and proper conclusions are derived.

[1]  A.D.R. Medeiros,et al.  Congestion due to reactive power: cost allocation , 2003, 2003 IEEE Bologna Power Tech Conference Proceedings,.

[2]  J. L. Carpentier "CRIC", A New Active-Reactive Decoupling Process in Load Flows, Optimal Power Flows and System Control , 1987 .

[3]  A. Kumar,et al.  A zonal congestion management approach using real and reactive power rescheduling , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[4]  A. Monticelli,et al.  Fast decoupled load flow: hypothesis, derivations, and testing , 1990 .

[5]  Fushuan Wen,et al.  Valuation of reactive power support services based on sensitivity and risk analysis , 2007 .

[6]  Hao Wu,et al.  A novel market-based reactive power management scheme , 2006 .

[7]  C. Aumuller,et al.  Determination of Power System Coherent Bus Groups by Novel Sensitivity-Based Method for Voltage Stability Assessment , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[8]  Eric Hcbson,et al.  Network Constrained Reactive Power Control Using Linear Programming , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[9]  P. Kundur,et al.  Valuation of Dynamic Reactive Power Support Services for Transmission Access , 2001 .

[10]  L. S. Shapley,et al.  17. A Value for n-Person Games , 1953 .

[11]  N. Amjady,et al.  Reactive power pricing [The Business Scene] , 2009, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine.

[12]  G. Chicco,et al.  Unbundled Reactive Support Service: Key Characteristics and Dominant Cost Component , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[13]  A. Padilha-Feltrin,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis For Overload-Relief In Transmission Lines Using An Implicitly Coupled Method (CRIC) , 2006, 2006 IEEE/PES Transmission & Distribution Conference and Exposition: Latin America.

[14]  Donald B. Gillies,et al.  3. Solutions to General Non-Zero-Sum Games , 1959 .

[15]  K. Bhattacharya,et al.  Towards a Competitive Market for Reactive Power , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[16]  D. Schmeidler The Nucleolus of a Characteristic Function Game , 1969 .

[17]  A. Bose,et al.  Localized reactive power markets using the concept of voltage control areas , 2004, 2006 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting.