Comparison of Directigen Flu A+B with Real Time PCR in the Diagnosis of Influenza.

UNLABELLED Early diagnosis and treatment of patients with influenza is the reason why physicians need rapid high-sensitivity influenza diagnostic tests that require no complex lab equipment and can be performed and interpreted within 15 min. The Aim of this study was to compare the rapid Directigen Flu A+B test with real time PCR for detection of influenza viruses in the Republic of Macedonia. MATERIALS AND METHODS One-hundred-eight respiratory samples (combined nose and throat swabs) were routinely collected for detection of influenza virus during influenza seasons. Forty-one patients were pediatric cases and 59 were adult. Their mean age was 23 years. The patients were allocated into 6 age groups: 0-4 yrs, 5-9 yrs, 10-14 yrs, 15-19 yrs, 20-64 yrs and > 65 yrs. Each sample was tested with Directigen Flu A+B and CDC real time PCR kit for detection and typisation/subtypisation of influenza according to the lab diagnostic protocol. RESULTS Directigen Flu A+B identified influenza A virus in 20 (18.5%) samples and influenza B virus in two 2 (1.9%) samples. The high specificity (100%) and PPV of Directigen Flu A+B we found in our study shows that the positive results do not need to be confirmed. The overall sensitivity of Directigen Flu A+B is 35.1% for influenza A virus and 33.0% for influenza B virus. The sensitivity for influenza A is higher among children hospitalized (45.0%) and outpatients (40.0%) versus adults. CONCLUSION Directigen Flu A+B has relatively low sensitivity for detection of influenza viruses in combined nose and throat swabs. Negative results must be confirmed.

[1]  F. Adler-Shohet,et al.  Evaluation of Indirect Fluorescent Antibody Assays Compared to Rapid Influenza Diagnostic Tests for the Detection of Pandemic Influenza A (H1N1) pdm09 , 2012, PloS one.

[2]  Michael Laviolette,et al.  Detection of 2009 pandemic influenza A(H1N1) virus Infection in different age groups by using rapid influenza diagnostic tests , 2011, Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses.

[3]  R. Konrad,et al.  A multiplex one-step real-time RT-PCR assay for influenza surveillance. , 2011, Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin.

[4]  P. Van Royen,et al.  Clinical prediction rules combining signs, symptoms and epidemiological context to distinguish influenza from influenza-like illnesses in primary care: a cross sectional study , 2011, BMC family practice.

[5]  M. Ciblak,et al.  Sensitivity of rapid influenza antigen tests in the diagnosis of pandemic (H1N1)2009 compared with the standard rRT-PCR technique during the 2009 pandemic in Turkey , 2010, Scandinavian journal of infectious diseases.

[6]  C. Rodrigo,et al.  Utility of the rapid antigen detection BinaxNOW Influenza A&B test for detection of novel influenza A (H1N1) virus , 2010 .

[7]  Y. Kawaoka,et al.  Sensitivity of Influenza Rapid Diagnostic Tests to H5N1 and 2009 Pandemic H1N1 Viruses , 2010, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[8]  C. Glaser,et al.  Rapid Influenza Antigen Test for Diagnosis of Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 , 2010, Emerging infectious diseases.

[9]  M. Hawkes,et al.  Sensitivity of Rapid Influenza Diagnostic Testing for Swine-Origin 2009 A (H1N1) Influenza Virus in Children , 2010, Pediatrics.

[10]  H. Foo,et al.  Comparison of a Rapid Antigen Test with Nucleic Acid Testing during Cocirculation of Pandemic Influenza A/H1N1 2009 and Seasonal Influenza A/H3N2 , 2009, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[11]  M. Menegus,et al.  Analytical and Clinical Sensitivity of the 3M Rapid Detection Influenza A+B Assay , 2008, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[12]  R. Thomson,,et al.  Review of Rapid Diagnostic Tests for Influenza , 2004 .

[13]  E. Padilla,et al.  Evaluation of a New Dot Blot Enzyme Immunoassay (Directigen Flu A+B) for Simultaneous and Differential Detection of Influenza A and B Virus Antigens from Respiratory Samples , 2002, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[14]  J. Peiris,et al.  Evaluation of the Directigen FluA+B Test for Rapid Diagnosis of Influenza Virus Type A and B Infections , 2002, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[15]  A. Monto,et al.  Clinical signs and symptoms predicting influenza infection. , 2000, Archives of internal medicine.

[16]  U. Allen.  The battle against influenza: The role of neuraminidase inhibitors in children. , 2000, The Canadian journal of infectious diseases = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses.

[17]  F. Hayden,et al.  Performance of virus isolation and Directigen Flu A to detect influenza A virus in experimental human infection. , 1999, Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology.

[18]  M. Shaw,et al.  Evaluation of rapid influenza diagnostic tests for detection of novel influenza A (H1N1) Virus - United States, 2009. , 2009, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[19]  N. Shahrour.  The Role of Neuraminidase Inhibitors in the Treatment and Prevention of Influenza. , 2001, Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology.

[20]  R. Kurlan,et al.  Comparison of Directigen FLU-A with viral isolation and direct , 1991 .