Peer-Based Recommendations in Online B2C E-Commerce: Comparing Collaborative Personalization and Social Network-Based Personalization

With the widespread diffusion of social network platforms, e-vendors can now use social network information to provide personalized services to their consumers. Nonetheless, the accuracy of social network-based personalization remains uncertain, as compared to that of traditional personalization approaches. Drawing on social influence and similarity attraction theories, this study compares social network-based personalization with the traditional peer-based personalization approach of collaborative personalization. We report results of a preliminary within subject experiment of 29 subjects belonging to a single social network. Our findings indicate that social network-based personalization can provide accurate personalized offerings. These are as accurate as those of collaborative personalization when within the specific product category on which collaborative personalization is based and better than collaborative personalization when outside the specific category.

[1]  Noah E. Friedkin,et al.  Structural bases of interpersonal influence in groups: a longitudinal case study , 1993 .

[2]  John Riedl,et al.  Meta-recommendation systems: user-controlled integration of diverse recommendations , 2002, CIKM '02.

[3]  Noah E. Friedkin,et al.  A Structural Theory of Social Influence: List of Tables and Figures , 1998 .

[4]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[5]  P. S. Visser,et al.  Attitudes in the social context: the impact of social network composition on individual-level attitude strength. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[7]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[8]  E.,et al.  GROUPS : INTERACTION AND PERFORMANCE , 2001 .

[9]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Effects of Personalizaion and Familiarity on Trust and Adoption of Recommendation Agents , 2006, MIS Q..

[10]  Shuk Ying Ho,et al.  Understanding the Impact of Web Personalization on User Information Processing and Decision Outcomes , 2006, MIS Q..

[11]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Research Note: The Influence of Recommendations and Consumer Reviews on Evaluations of Websites , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[12]  M. Deutsch,et al.  A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgement. , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[13]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Evaluating Anthropomorphic Product Recommendation Agents: A Social Relationship Perspective to Designing Information Systems , 2009, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[14]  W M Klein Objective standards are not enough: affective, self-evaluative, and behavioral responses to social comparison information. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  Gediminas Adomavicius,et al.  Personalization technologies , 2005, Commun. ACM.

[16]  D. Byrne The Attraction Paradigm , 1971 .

[17]  M. Fishbein A theory of reasoned action: some applications and implications. , 1980, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[18]  Yi-Cheng Ku,et al.  Personalized Content Recommendation and User Satisfaction: Theoretical Synthesis and Empirical Findings , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Valerie J. Trifts,et al.  Consumer Decision Making in Online Shopping Environments: The Effects of Interactive Decision Aids , 2000 .

[20]  Timothy H. Greer,et al.  Web Personalization: The Impact of Perceived Innovation Characteristics on the Intention to Use Personalization , 2003, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..