Protection of Pharmacological Postconditioning in Liver Surgery: Results of a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Objectives:To elucidate the possible organ-protective effect of pharmacological postconditioning in patients undergoing liver resection with inflow occlusion. Background:Inflow occlusion reduces blood loss during liver transection in selected patients but is potentially harmful due to ischemia-reperfusion injury. Preventive strategies include the use of repetitive short periods of ischemia interrupted by a reperfusion phase (intermittent clamping), application of a short period of ischemia before transection (ischemic preconditioning), or pharmacological preconditioning before transection. Whether intervention after resection (postconditioning) may confer protection is unknown. Methods:A 3 arm, prospective, randomized trial was designed for patients undergoing liver resection with inflow occlusion to compare the effects of pharmacological postconditioning with the volatile anesthetic agent sevoflurane (n = 48), intermittent clamping (n = 50), or no protective intervention (continuous inflow occlusion, n = 17). Endpoints included peak serum aspartate transaminase level, postoperative complications, and hospital stay. All patients were intravenously anesthetized with propofol. In patients with postconditioning, propofol infusion was stopped upon reperfusion and replaced with sevoflurane for 10 minutes. Results:Compared with the control group, both postconditioning (P = 0.044) and intermittent clamping (P = 0.015) significantly reduced aspartate transaminase levels. The risk of complications was significantly decreased by postconditioning, odds ratio, 0.08 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.02–0.36; P = 0.001]) and intermittent clamping, odds ratio, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.26–0.96; P = 0.038], compared with controls. Both interventions reduced length of hospital stay, postconditioning −4 days [95% CI, −6 to −1; P = 0.009], and intermittent clamping −2 days, [95% CI, −4 to 0; P = 0.019]. Conclusions:Pharmacological postconditioning reduces organ injury and postoperative complications. This easily applicable strategy should be used in patients with prolonged continuous inflow occlusion.

[1]  Ksenija Slankamenac,et al.  The Impact of Complications on Costs of Major Surgical Procedures: A Cost Analysis of 1200 Patients , 2011, Annals of surgery.

[2]  M. Blettner,et al.  Novel and simple preoperative score predicting complications after liver resection in noncirrhotic patients. , 2011, Annals of surgery.

[3]  M. Puhan,et al.  High prevalence of potential biases threatens the interpretation of trials in patients with chronic disease , 2011, BMC medicine.

[4]  P. Hansen,et al.  Postconditioning during primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a review and meta-analysis. , 2010, International journal of cardiology.

[5]  Y. Sun,et al.  A Comparison of Liver Function After Hepatectomy with Inflow Occlusion Between Sevoflurane and Propofol Anesthesia , 2010, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[6]  J. Joh,et al.  The effects of desflurane and sevoflurane on hepatic and renal functions after right hepatectomy in living donors * , 2010, Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation.

[7]  Zhi-Qing Zhao.  Postconditioning in Reperfusion Injury: A Status Report , 2010, Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy.

[8]  L. Feldman,et al.  Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations , 2009, The Lancet.

[9]  M. Lesurtel,et al.  Clamping techniques and protecting strategies in liver surgery. , 2009, HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association.

[10]  M. Puhan,et al.  A Randomized Controlled Trial on Pharmacological Preconditioning in Liver Surgery Using a Volatile Anesthetic , 2008, Annals of surgery.

[11]  W. Berry,et al.  An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modelling strategy based on available data , 2008, The Lancet.

[12]  N. Fleming,et al.  Anesthetic Preconditioning Combined with Postconditioning Offers No Additional Benefit Over Preconditioning or Postconditioning Alone , 2007, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[13]  Elena Bignami,et al.  Desflurane and sevoflurane in cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. , 2007, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[14]  S. Curley,et al.  Hepatic insufficiency and mortality in 1,059 noncirrhotic patients undergoing major hepatectomy. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[15]  H. Petrowsky,et al.  Strategies for safer liver surgery and partial liver transplantation. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  A. Zangrillo,et al.  Cardiac protection by volatile anaesthetics: a multicentre randomized controlled study in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass , 2007, European journal of anaesthesiology.

[17]  G. Gores,et al.  Clinical Trial of the Pan‐Caspase Inhibitor, IDN‐6556, in Human Liver Preservation Injury , 2007, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[18]  W. Jochum,et al.  A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Intermittent Portal Triad Clamping Versus Ischemic Preconditioning With Continuous Clamping for Major Liver Resection , 2006, Annals of surgery.

[19]  A. Zangrillo,et al.  Myocardial damage prevented by volatile anesthetics: a multicenter randomized controlled study. , 2006, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[20]  A. Lemoine,et al.  Ischemic preconditioning for major liver resection under vascular exclusion of the liver preserving the caval flow: a randomized prospective study. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[21]  G. Finet,et al.  Postconditioning the Human Heart , 2005, Circulation.

[22]  P. Rothwell.  Subgroup analysis in randomised controlled trials: importance, indications, and interpretation , 2005, The Lancet.

[23]  S. D. De Hert,et al.  Cardioprotective Properties of Sevoflurane in Patients Undergoing Coronary Surgery with Cardiopulmonary Bypass Are Related to the Modalities of Its Administration , 2004, Anesthesiology.

[24]  N. Demartines,et al.  Classification of Surgical Complications: A New Proposal With Evaluation in a Cohort of 6336 Patients and Results of a Survey , 2004, Annals of Surgery.

[25]  H. Rüdiger,et al.  A Prospective Randomized Study in 100 Consecutive Patients Undergoing Major Liver Resection With Versus Without Ischemic Preconditioning , 2003, Annals of surgery.

[26]  H. Rüdiger,et al.  Sub-lethal oxidative stress triggers the protective effects of ischemic preconditioning in the mouse liver. , 2003, Journal of hepatology.

[27]  W. Schlack,et al.  Cardioprotection against reperfusion injury is maximal with only two minutes of sevoflurane administration in rats , 2003, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[28]  E. Lucchinetti,et al.  Anaesthetics and cardiac preconditioning. Part I. Signalling and cytoprotective mechanisms. , 2003, British journal of anaesthesia.

[29]  R. Guyton,et al.  Inhibition of myocardial injury by ischemic postconditioning during reperfusion: comparison with ischemic preconditioning. , 2003, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[30]  W. Jochum,et al.  Ischemic preconditioning protects the steatotic mouse liver against reperfusion injury: an ATP dependent mechanism. , 2003, Journal of Hepatology.

[31]  H. Rüdiger,et al.  Comparison of Ischemic Preconditioning and Intermittent and Continuous Inflow Occlusion in the Murine Liver , 2002, Annals of surgery.

[32]  W. Schlack,et al.  One MAC of sevoflurane provides protection against reperfusion injury in the rat heart in vivo. , 2001, British journal of anaesthesia.

[33]  R. Bentley,et al.  Protective Effects of Ischemic Preconditioning for Liver Resection Performed Under Inflow Occlusion in Humans , 2000, Annals of surgery.

[34]  P. Menasché,et al.  Evidence for preconditioning by isoflurane in coronary artery bypass graft surgery. , 1999, Circulation.

[35]  J. Marty,et al.  Continuous versus intermittent portal triad clamping for liver resection: a controlled study. , 1999, Annals of surgery.

[36]  J. Melendez,et al.  Perioperative outcomes of major hepatic resections under low central venous pressure anesthesia: blood loss, blood transfusion, and the risk of postoperative renal dysfunction. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[37]  K. Ishak,et al.  Histological grading and staging of chronic hepatitis. , 1995 .

[38]  P. Bedossa,et al.  Intraobserver and Interobserver Variations in Liver Biopsy Interpretation in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C , 1994 .