Assessment of bone status using speed of sound at multiple anatomical sites.

Studies in vitro and in vivo have shown that quantitative ultrasound (QUS) is a valid tool for the assessment of bone status. Current QUS methods using the transmission technique are limited to one peripheral bone site. A new system, Sunlight Omnisense (Omnisense, Sunlight Medical Ltd., Rehovot, Israel), measures speed of sound (SOS, in m/s) along the surface of the bone based on an axial transmission technique. The Omnisense can measure SOS at several anatomical sites. This study evaluated the SOS at different anatomical sites in a healthy population. A total of 334 adult women from three research centers in the USA and Canada with a mean (+/- SD) age of 48.8 (+/- 17.4) years were enrolled in this study. SOS was measured at the proximal third phalanx, distal one third radius, midshaft tibia, and fifth metatarsal. The mean SOS (+/- SD) values for the phalanx, radius, tibia and metatarsal were 3984 (+/- 221), 4087 (+/- 147), 3893 (+/- 150) and 3690 (+/- 246) m/s, respectively. Each anatomical site SOS was significantly different (p < 0.001) from that of the other sites. SOS at the different anatomical sites was modestly, but significantly, correlated (r = 0.31 to 0.56, p < 0.001). Similar correlation coefficients were obtained for the T scores. The mean T scores for subjects over the age of 60 years were -1.94, -2.01, -0.97 and -1.42 for the phalanx, radius, tibia and metatarsal, respectively. The age of peak SOS and the rate of change thereafter varied with anatomical site, implying that the prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis was site-dependent if only one T score cut-off point was used. Comparing individuals, 10% to 17% of patients had T scores that differed by more than a factor of 2 between sites. Weight and age were some of the contributing factors to this heterogeneity. The Omnisense provides an opportunity to assess bone status at different anatomical sites. Whether or not combining measurements from all these anatomical sites will improve osteoporosis management still needs to be determined.

[1]  C. Slemenda,et al.  High intensity activities in young women: site specific bone mass effects among female figure skaters. , 1993, Bone and mineral.

[2]  J. Davis,et al.  Predicting vertebral deformity using bone densitometry at various skeletal sites and calcaneus ultrasound. , 1995, Bone.

[3]  S. Adami,et al.  Site‐Specific Effects of Strength Training on Bone Structure and Geometry of Ultradistal Radius in Postmenopausal Women , 1999, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[4]  S. Shimegi,et al.  Physical exercise increases bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. , 1994, Endocrine journal.

[5]  D. Chinn,et al.  Identification of Women with Reduced Bone Density at the Lumbar Spine and Femoral Neck using BMD at the Os Calcis , 2000, Osteoporosis International.

[6]  C C Glüer,et al.  Comparisons of Noninvasive Bone Mineral Measurements in Assessing Age‐Related Loss, Fracture Discrimination, and Diagnostic Classification , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[7]  C F Njeh,et al.  The ability of ultrasound velocity to predict the stiffness of cancellous bone in vitro. , 1997, Bone.

[8]  R Stern,et al.  Measurement of the velocity of ultrasound in the human femur in vivo. , 1980, Medical physics.

[9]  H. Rico,et al.  Cortical Bone Resorption in Osteoporosis , 1997, Calcified Tissue International.

[10]  C. Sanborn,et al.  Dissimilar Spine and Femoral Z-Scores in Premenopausal Women , 1997, Calcified Tissue International.

[11]  M. Rapoport,et al.  Reference Database for Bone Speed of Sound Measurement by a Novel Quantitative Multi-site Ultrasound Device , 2000, Osteoporosis International.

[12]  J. Smit,et al.  Quantitative Ultrasound Measurements of the Tibia and Calcaneus in Comparison with DXA Measurements at Various Skeletal Sites , 1999, Osteoporosis International.

[13]  W J Bremner,et al.  Bone mineral content of amenorrheic and eumenorrheic athletes. , 1984, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  N M Keshawarz,et al.  Expansion of the medullary cavity at the expense of cortex in postmenopausal osteoporosis. , 1984, Metabolic bone disease & related research.

[15]  O. Johnell,et al.  World-wide Projections for Hip Fracture , 1997, Osteoporosis International.

[16]  H K Genant,et al.  Clinical utility of bone mass measurements in adults: consensus of an international panel. The Society for Clinical Densitometry. , 1996, Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism.

[17]  C M Langton,et al.  The role of ultrasound in the assessment of osteoporosis. , 1994, Clinical rheumatology.

[18]  S. Silverman,et al.  Deterioration in Quality of Life Following Hip Fracture: A Prospective Study , 2000, Osteoporosis International.

[19]  A. Huddleston,et al.  Bone mass in lifetime tennis athletes. , 1980, JAMA.

[20]  H. Frost,et al.  Perspectives: The role of changes in mechanical usage set points in the pathogenesis of osteoporosis , 1992, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[21]  P. Miller.  Controversies in Bone Mineral Density Diagnostic Classifications , 2000, Calcified Tissue International.

[22]  A Streda,et al.  Bone indexes and cortical thickness in assessing osteoporosis in rheumatic patients. , 1973, Scandinavian journal of rheumatology.

[23]  H K Genant,et al.  A new method for quantitative ultrasound measurements at multiple skeletal sites: first results of precision and fracture discrimination. , 2000, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

[24]  S. Cummings,et al.  Classification of Osteoporosis Based on Bone Mineral Densities , 2001, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[25]  R. Parker,et al.  Classification of osteoporosis and osteopenia in postmenopausal women is dependent on site-specific analysis. , 1999, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

[26]  K. Fox,et al.  Radial and ulnar cortical thickness of the second metacarpal , 1995, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[27]  P. Miller,et al.  Discordance in patient classification using T-scores. , 1999, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

[28]  C. Langton,et al.  The measurement of broadband ultrasonic attenuation in cancellous bone. , 1984, Engineering in medicine.

[29]  P. Ross,et al.  Evidence for both generalized and regional low bone mass among elderly women , 1994, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[30]  R. Recker,et al.  Heterogeneity of bone mineral density across skeletal sites and its clinical implications. , 1998, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

[31]  F. Eckstein,et al.  Precision and intersite correlation of bone densitometry at the radius, tibia and femur with peripheral quantitative CT , 1999, Skeletal Radiology.

[32]  G Berger,et al.  Analysis of the axial transmission technique for the assessment of skeletal status. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  C. Wu,et al.  Estimation of wrist fracture load using phalangeal speed of sound: an in vitro study. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[34]  J. Kanis,et al.  An Update on the Diagnosis and Assessment of Osteoporosis with Densitometry , 2000, Osteoporosis International.

[35]  H. Kley,et al.  Enhanced conversion of androstenedione to estrogens in obese males. , 1980, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[36]  C. Njeh,et al.  Variation in bone mineral density between different anatomical sites in a normal local population. , 1998, Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine.

[37]  C. Njeh,et al.  Does Combining the Results from Multiple Bone Sites Measured by a New Quantitative Ultrasound Device Improve Discrimination of Hip Fracture? , 1999, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[38]  H K Genant,et al.  An in vitro investigation of the dependence on sample thickness of the speed of sound along the specimen. , 1999, Medical engineering & physics.

[39]  D G Oreopoulos,et al.  Periosteal resorption of finger phalanges: radial versus ulnar surfaces. , 1978, Journal of the Canadian Association of Radiologists.

[40]  J. Truscott.  Quantitative ultrasound—assessment of osteoporosis and bone status , 2000 .

[41]  R. Mazess,et al.  Interrelationships among bone densitometry sites in normal young women. , 1990, Bone and mineral.

[42]  H. Genant,et al.  Multisite bone ultrasound measurement on North American female reference population. , 2001, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

[43]  P P Antich.  Ultrasound study of bone in vitro. , 1993, Calcified tissue international.

[44]  P. Antich,et al.  Measurement of intrinsic bone quality in vivo by reflection ultrasound: Correction of impaired quality with slow‐release sodium fluoride and calcium citrate , 1993, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.