Risk perception for developing diabetes: comparative risk judgments of physicians.

OBJECTIVE To assess personal risk perceptions for developing diabetes among practicing physicians. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Little is known about comparative risk perceptions concerning diabetes among medical experts. We administered the new Risk Perception Survey for Developing Diabetes to 535 nondiabetic physicians. The participants were 86% male, had a mean age of 49 years, and were 66% white and 24% Asian. Almost 37% were considered at higher risk for developing diabetes based on self-reported risk factors. Over 91% of respondents were either internal medicine or family medicine physicians. RESULTS Of the four subscales, Comparative Disease Risk and Environmental Risk indicated moderate risk perceptions, whereas Personal Control scores indicated a robust sense of control over developing diabetes. Optimistic Bias scores showed a tendency toward participants' being optimistic that they were less likely to develop diabetes. Based on self-reported risk factor categories, a comparison of scores between physicians at higher risk (n = 196) and those at lower risk (n = 313) for developing diabetes showed greater comparative disease risk perception among the higher risk physicians (P < 0.01), as well as greater perception of diabetes risk (P < 0.001). Nearly 50% of higher risk physicians, however, reported an optimistic bias that they were less likely to develop diabetes than other people of their same age and sex. Women (n = 75) reported greater perception of environmental risks than men (P < 0.001). Asian respondents (n = 126) reported greater perception of environmental risk (P < 0.001) and greater worry about developing diabetes (P < 0.0001) than white respondents (n = 355). Regression analyses showed that scores for nondiabetes comparative disease risks (0.39) and level of optimistic bias (0.31) were predictive of diabetes risk perception (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS The data gathered on physicians' perception of their personal risk for developing diabetes and other comparative risk judgments provided an expert comparison for future analyses of at-risk or lay individuals' perceptions of diabetes risk. Effective communication of diabetes risk among physicians, patients, and the general public relies on knowledge of and sensitivity to group differences in these perceptions.

[1]  Cynthia J. Atman,et al.  Designing risk communications , 1994 .

[2]  S. Genuth,et al.  The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  C. K. Mertz,et al.  Gender, race, and perception of environmental health risks. , 1994, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[4]  W. Klein,et al.  Heuristics and Biases: Resistance of Personal Risk Perceptions to Debiasing Interventions , 2002 .

[5]  N. Weinstein.  Testing four competing theories of health-protective behavior. , 1993, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[6]  Uk-Prospective-Diabetes-Study-Group.  Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33) , 1998, The Lancet.

[7]  P. Slovic.  Perception of risk. , 1987, Science.

[8]  B Fischhoff,et al.  Why (cancer) risk communication can be hard. , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[9]  R. Schwing,et al.  Societal Risk Assessment , 1980 .

[10]  V. Covello,et al.  Risk Analysis: A Guide to Principles and Methods for Analyzing Health and Environmental Risks , 1989 .

[11]  N D Weinstein,et al.  Perceived probability, perceived severity, and health-protective behavior. , 2000, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[12]  B Fischhoff,et al.  Designing risk communications: completing and correcting mental models of hazardous processes, Part I. , 1994, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[13]  S. Fowler,et al.  Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. , 2002 .

[14]  A. Marette,et al.  Selective Impairment in GLUT4 Translocation to Transverse Tubules in Skeletal Muscle of Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Rats , 1998, Diabetes.

[15]  P. Gustafson.  Gender Differences in Risk Perception: Theoretical and Methodological Perspectives , 1998, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[16]  N. Weinstein.  Optimistic biases about personal risks. , 1989, Science.

[17]  Steven Prentice-Dunn,et al.  Protection motivation theory. , 1997 .

[18]  M. Ellenberg,et al.  Ellenberg and Rifkin's Diabetes Mellitus , 2002 .

[19]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Behavioral science research in the prevention of diabetes : status and opportunities. , 2002, Diabetes care.

[20]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Evaluating Risk Communications: Completing and Correcting Mental Models of Hazardous Processes, Part II , 1994 .

[21]  M. Becker,et al.  The Health Belief Model: A Decade Later , 1984, Health education quarterly.

[22]  N D Weinstein,et al.  Scales for assessing perceptions of health hazard susceptibility. , 1993, Health education research.

[23]  Communication about risk--dilemmas for general practitioners. The Department of General Practice Working Group, University of Wales College of Medicine. , 1997, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[24]  E. Vaughan,et al.  The Significance of Socioeconomic and Ethnic Diversity for the Risk Communication Process , 1995 .

[25]  N. Weinstein.  Unrealistic optimism about susceptibility to health problems: Conclusions from a community-wide sample , 1987, Journal of Behavioral Medicine.

[26]  Introduction and Overview 1.1 Introduction , 2001 .

[27]  Vern R. Walker.  Direct Inference, Probability, and a Conceptual Gulf in Risk Communication , 1995 .

[28]  R. Holman,et al.  Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. , 1998 .