Minimally invasive cardiac surgery defined.

There is no operation as complex, yet as fundamentally unchanged over time, as conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). This remarkable achievement is attributed to the operation's adaptability to a wide variety of clinical settings; its reproducibility, although performed by surgeons all across the world; and its proved track record for safety and effectiveness. A monumental effort, however, is currently under way to redefine CABG. This paradigm shift has received a groundswell of support as advances in minimally invasive surgery in other areas, such as arthroscopy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and thoracoscopy, combined with an increasing focus on cost containment, have forever changed the milieu of the cardiac surgeon. This review examines the clinical and research issues surrounding minimally invasive CABG from the vantage point of a surgeon-scientist working in the field.

[1]  W. Sealy,et al.  Potassium, magnesium, and neostigmine for controlled cardioplegia: a report of its use in 34 patients. , 1959, The Journal of thoracic surgery.

[2]  M. Lipton,et al.  The VA cooperative randomized study of surgery for coronary arterial occlusive disease II. Subgroup with significant left main lesions. , 1976, Circulation.

[3]  Eleven-year survival in the Veterans Administration randomized trial of coronary bypass surgery for stable angina. , 1984, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  R. Jones,et al.  Mediastinitis After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Risk Factors and Long‐Term Survival , 1995, Circulation.

[5]  Edmunds Lh,et al.  Why cardiopulmonary bypass makes patients sick: strategies to control the blood-synthetic surface interface. , 1995 .

[6]  J. Ferguson,et al.  American College of Cardiology 45th Annual Scientific Session, Orlando, Florida, March 24 to 27, 1996. , 1996, Circulation.

[7]  James T. Willerson,et al.  Appointment of New Associate Editor for Circulation , 1996 .

[8]  J. Willerson Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with angioplasty in patients with multivessel disease. , 1996, Circulation.

[9]  G. E. Green,et al.  Coronary bypass surgery with internal-thoracic-artery grafts--effects on survival over a 15-year period. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  Robert L. Frye,et al.  Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with angioplasty in patients with multivessel disease. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  C. Tulleken,et al.  Coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass and without interruption of native coronary flow using a novel anastomosis site restraining device ("Octopus"). , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  R. Emery,et al.  Mini-sternotomy for coronary artery bypass grafting. , 1996, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[13]  J. Akin,et al.  Safe and effective method of stabilization for coronary artery bypass grafting on the beating heart. , 1997, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[14]  J. Fonger,et al.  Cost analysis of current therapies for limited coronary artery revascularization. , 1997, Circulation.

[15]  M. Mack,et al.  Minimally invasive coronary bypass for protected left main coronary stenosis angioplasty. , 1997, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[16]  J. V. van Herwaarden,et al.  Hemodynamic changes during displacement of the beating heart by the Utrecht Octopus method. , 1997, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[17]  G M McKhann,et al.  Adverse cerebral outcomes after coronary bypass surgery. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  W. van Oeveren,et al.  Reduction of the inflammatory response in patients undergoing minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting. , 1998, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[19]  C Cardon,et al.  [Computer assisted open heart surgery. First case operated on with success]. , 1998, Comptes rendus de l'Academie des sciences. Serie III, Sciences de la vie.

[20]  J. Magovern,et al.  Morbidity, cost, and six-month outcome of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting. , 1998, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[21]  F. Duhaylongsod,et al.  High-flow gas insufflation to facilitate MIDCABG: effects on coronary endothelium. , 1998, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[22]  T Walther,et al.  Minimally invasive port-access mitral valve surgery. , 1998, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[23]  D. Glower,et al.  Mitral valve operation via Port Access versus median sternotomy. , 1998, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[24]  W. Chitwood,et al.  Endoscopic robotic coronary surgery is this reality or fantasy? , 1999, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[25]  M. Zimarino,et al.  Multiple arterial conduits without cardiopulmonary bypass: early angiographic results. , 1999, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[26]  A. Berrebi,et al.  Endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting with the aid of robotic assisted instruments. , 1999, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[27]  A. Galloway,et al.  First report of the Port Access International Registry. , 1999, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[28]  M. Mack,et al.  Results of graft patency by immediate angiography in minimally invasive coronary artery surgery. , 1999, The Annals of thoracic surgery.