Through the Loupe: Visitor Engagement With a Primarily Text-Based Handheld AR Application

The use of Augmented Reality (AR) in a museum or heritage setting holds great potential. However, until now, introducing AR into their buildings has been prohibitively expensive for most museums. On the one hand, programming the AR application could not be done in-house and would be rather costly. Secondly, the time-consuming production of high-quality digital visuals, often used in AR installations, needed to be outsourced. With the arrival of several AR engines, creating the actual experience has become easy, relatively fast and cheap, meaning the costs and skills associated with content creation might be the prime reason for particularly small and medium sized museums to not engage with the use of AR. This begs the question: Can other, simpler, types of content, such as texts, also be used to create a valued AR interpretation tool? This paper will discuss a study that has made a first attempt to answering this question. In addition, it explored the role AR can play in improving engagement between visitor, the object and its related information. The Loupe is a handheld AR application that was designed and tested as part of the meSch project. For this study, content, mainly consisting of text, was created for the Loupe at the Allard Pierson Museum. The tool was then tested with 22 participants who were asked to use the Loupe, either alone or together. Through questionnaires, observations and interviews, participants’ engagement with and response to the Loupe were analyzed. This paper will discuss the findings of that study, focusing on the way the Loupe influenced the relationship between visitor and object, as well as the value of textual content as part of such an AR tool.

[1]  Jay Rounds,et al.  Strategies for the Curiosity‐Driven Museum Visitor , 2004 .

[2]  S. Bitgood,et al.  The Effects of Gallery Changes on Visitor Reading and Object Viewing Time , 1993 .

[3]  Stephen Bitgood,et al.  The Role of Attention in Designing Effective Interpretive Labels , 2000 .

[4]  Louise J. Ravelli Making language accessible: Successful text writing for museum visitors , 1996 .

[5]  Maria Economou,et al.  Mobile Augmented Reality edutainment applications for cultural institutions , 2013, IISA 2013.

[6]  Maria Roussou,et al.  Personalizing Interactive Digital Storytelling in Archaeological Museums: the CHESS Project , 2011 .

[7]  Daniel Pletinckx,et al.  Presenting a monument in restoration: the Saint Laurentius church in Ename and its role in the Francia Media heritage initiative , 2001, VAST '01.

[8]  Luca Roffia,et al.  Exciting understanding in Pompeii through on-site parallel interaction with dual time virtual models , 2001, VAST '01.

[9]  Wim van Eck,et al.  The augmented painting: Playful interaction with multi-spectral images , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality - Arts, Media, and Humanities (ISMAR-AMH).

[10]  Daniela Petrelli,et al.  meSch - Material Encounters with Digital Cultural Heritage , 2014, EuroMed.

[11]  Motivating Visitors to Read Labels , .

[12]  Albrecht Schmidt,et al.  Integrating material and digital: a new way for cultural heritage , 2013, INTR.

[13]  E. Alexander Museums in Motion: An Introduction to the History and Functions of Museums , 1996 .

[14]  A. Damala An introduction to augmented reality and cultural heritage for curators, art historians and museum educators , 2013 .

[15]  B. Serrell Paying Attention: The Duration and Allocation of Visitors' Time in Museum Exhibitions , 1997 .

[16]  Daniela Petrelli,et al.  Recipes for tangible and embodied visit experiences , 2015 .

[17]  Areti Damala,et al.  Bridging the gap between the digital and the physical: design and evaluation of a mobile augmented reality guide for the museum visit , 2008, DIMEA.

[18]  George Papagiannakis,et al.  A taxonomy of visualization strategies for cultural heritage applications , 2010, JOCCH.

[19]  A. Damala,et al.  Tailoring the Adaptive Augmented Reality (A2R) museum visit: Identifying Cultural Heritage professionals' motivations and needs , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality - Arts, Media, and Humanities (ISMAR-AMH).

[20]  Beverly Serrell,et al.  Exhibit Labels: An Interpretive Approach , 1996 .

[21]  S. Macdonald,et al.  Rewriting the museums' fictions: Taxonomies, stories and readers , 1990 .

[22]  G. Hein The Constructivist Museum , 1995 .

[23]  R. E. Robinson,et al.  The art of seeing : an interpretation of the aesthetic encounter , 1993 .

[24]  Eva Hornecker,et al.  “I don’t understand it either, but it is cool” - visitor interactions with a multi-touch table in a museum , 2008, 2008 3rd IEEE International Workshop on Horizontal Interactive Human Computer Systems.

[25]  Allison Woodruff,et al.  Electronic Guidebooks and Visitor Attention , 2001, ICHIM.