Towards sensible toxicity testing for nanomaterials: proposal for the specification of test design

Abstract During the last decade, nanomaterials (NM) were extensively tested for potential harmful effects towards humans and environmental organisms. However, a sound hazard assessment was so far hampered by uncertainties and a low comparability of test results. The reason for the low comparability is a high variation in the (1) type of NM tested with regard to raw material, size and shape and (2) procedures before and during the toxicity testing. This calls for tailored, nanomaterial-specific protocols. Here, a structured approach is proposed, intended to lead to test protocols not only tailored to specific types of nanomaterials, but also to respective test system for toxicity testing. There are existing standards on single procedures involving nanomaterials, however, not all relevant procedures are covered by standards. Hence, our approach offers a detailed way of weighting several plausible alternatives for e.g. sample preparation, in order to decide on the procedure most meaningful for a specific nanomaterial and toxicity test. A framework of several decision trees (DT) and flow charts to support testing of NM is proposed as a basis for further refinement and in-depth elaboration. DT and flow charts were drafted for (1) general procedure—physicochemical characterisation, (2) choice of test media, (3) decision on test scenario and application of NM to liquid media, (4) application of NM to the gas phase, (5) application of NM to soil and sediments, (6) dose metrics, (S1) definition of a nanomaterial, and (S2) dissolution. The applicability of the proposed approach was surveyed by using experimental data retrieved from studies on nanoscale CuO. This survey demonstrated the DT and flow charts to be a convenient tool to systematically decide upon test procedures and processes, and hence pose an important step towards harmonisation of NM testing.

[1]  Sebastian Hoffmann,et al.  Integrated Testing Strategy (ITS) - Opportunities to better use existing data and guide future testing in toxicology. , 2010, ALTEX.

[2]  C James Kirkpatrick,et al.  Pulmonary surfactant augments cytotoxicity of silica nanoparticles: Studies on an in vitro air–blood barrier model , 2015, Beilstein journal of nanotechnology.

[3]  Maria Dusinska,et al.  Nanomaterials for environmental studies: classification, reference material issues, and strategies for physico-chemical characterisation. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[4]  Arnaud Magrez,et al.  Are carbon nanotube effects on green algae caused by shading and agglomeration? , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  Frank Babick,et al.  Mobility of coated and uncoated TiO2 nanomaterials in soil columns--Applicability of the tests methods of OECD TG 312 and 106 for nanomaterials. , 2015, Journal of environmental management.

[6]  Albert A Koelmans,et al.  Ecotoxicity test methods for engineered nanomaterials: Practical experiences and recommendations from the bench , 2012, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[7]  Mark R. Wiesner,et al.  Ultrasonic dispersion of nanoparticles for environmental, health and safety assessment – issues and recommendations , 2011, Nanotoxicology.

[8]  Sara Novak,et al.  An interlaboratory comparison of nanosilver characterisation and hazard identification: Harmonising techniques for high quality data. , 2016, Environment international.

[9]  Wibke Busch,et al.  Physical-chemical characterization of tungsten carbide nanoparticles as a basis for toxicological investigations , 2010, Nanotoxicology.

[10]  Teresa F. Fernandes,et al.  Practical considerations for conducting ecotoxicity test methods with manufactured nanomaterials: what have we learnt so far? , 2012, Ecotoxicology.

[11]  Hans Toni Ratte,et al.  ADaM, an artificial freshwater for the culture of zooplankton , 1994 .

[12]  Li Ning,et al.  Dispersion stabilization of antimony-doped tin oxide (ATO) nanoparticles used for energy-efficient glass coating , 2014 .

[13]  Anders Baun,et al.  Redefining risk research priorities for nanomaterials , 2009, Journal of nanoparticle research : an interdisciplinary forum for nanoscale science and technology.

[14]  Jingwen Chen,et al.  A practical approach to determine dose metrics for nanomaterials , 2015, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[15]  G. Bartosz,et al.  Pitfalls of assays devoted to evaluation of oxidative stress induced by inorganic nanoparticles. , 2013, Talanta.

[16]  Alexandra Kroll,et al.  Testing nanomaterial toxicity in unicellular eukaryotic algae and fish cell lines. , 2013, Methods in molecular biology.

[17]  Hugh J. Byrne,et al.  Concern-driven integrated approaches to nanomaterial testing and assessment – report of the NanoSafety Cluster Working Group 10 , 2013, Nanotoxicology.

[18]  T. Macé,et al.  Impact of batch variability on physicochemical properties of manufactured TiO2 and SiO2 nanopowders , 2014 .

[19]  Andreas Luch,et al.  Dynamic light-scattering measurement comparability of nanomaterial suspensions , 2014, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[20]  Steffen Foss Hansen,et al.  NanoRiskCat: a conceptual tool for categorization and communication of exposure potentials and hazards of nanomaterials in consumer products , 2013, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[21]  David B Warheit,et al.  How meaningful are risk determinations in the absence of a complete dataset? Making the case for publishing standardized test guideline and ‘no effect’ studies for evaluating the safety of nanoparticulates versus spurious ‘high effect’ results from single investigative studies , 2015, Science and technology of advanced materials.

[22]  Annegret Potthoff,et al.  Dispersion of nanomaterials used in toxicological studies: a comparison of sonication approaches demonstrated on TiO2 P25 , 2014, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[23]  Marco Vighi,et al.  SCCP (Scientific Committee on Consumer Products) / SCHER (Scientific Committee on Health& Environment Risks) / SCENIHR (Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly- Identified Health Risks) opinion on: Risk assessment methodologies and approaches for genotoxic and carcinogenic substances , 2009 .

[24]  Lang Tran,et al.  ITS-NANO - Prioritising nanosafety research to develop a stakeholder driven intelligent testing strategy , 2014, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[25]  J. Whalen,et al.  Differences in soil solution chemistry between soils amended with nanosized CuO or Cu reference materials: implications for nanotoxicity tests. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[26]  Dana Kühnel,et al.  The OECD expert meeting on ecotoxicology and environmental fate--towards the development of improved OECD guidelines for the testing of nanomaterials. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[27]  Hong Yin,et al.  A comparative study of the physical and chemical properties of nano-sized ZnO particles from multiple batches of three commercial products , 2015, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[28]  H. Krug,et al.  Oops they did it again! Carbon nanotubes hoax scientists in viability assays. , 2006, Nano letters.