Suppression of ventilation artifacts for gastrointestinal slow wave recordings

Gastrointestinal extracellular slow wave recordings are providing critical information about normal motility and pathophysiology of the gut. Processing the signals is an important adjunct to acquire clinically and physiologically meaningful analysis. In stomach and intestine in vivo slow wave recordings, ventilation (or respiratory) artifacts can be prominent, which hinders identification and analysis of slow wave profiles. Here, we introduce an algorithm to suppress these artifacts without distorting the slow wave morphology. The algorithm generates a cycle averaged ventilation signal by shifting the raw signal by its ventilation period. The cycle averaged ventilation signal is then subtracted from the slow wave recording. The algorithm was validated using signal to noise ratio (SNR) and Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) on synthetic signals and SNR with experimental recordings. With synthetic data, SNR and PCC, improved by 7.29±1.14 dB and 0.23±0.15.With experimental data SNR improved by 2.66±0.60 dB. This method improves the slow wave signal content revealing a more accurate estimate of the slow wave morphology. The application of this method will lead to improved analysis of slow wave recordings to understand gut function.

[1]  Andrew J. Pullan,et al.  Improved signal processing techniques for the analysis of high resolution serosal slow wave activity in the stomach , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[2]  Leo K. Cheng,et al.  Extending the automated gastrointestinal analysis pipeline: Removal of invalid slow wave marks in gastric serosal recordings , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[3]  J. Chen,et al.  Abnormal gastric slow waves in patients with functional dyspepsia assessed by multichannel electrogastrography. , 2001, American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology.

[4]  G. O’Grady,et al.  Comparison of filtering methods for extracellular gastric slow wave recordings , 2013, Neurogastroenterology and motility : the official journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society.

[5]  Leo K. Cheng,et al.  Time-Delay Mapping of High-Resolution Gastric Slow-Wave Activity , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  W. Lammers,et al.  Gut peristalsis is governed by a multitude of cooperating mechanisms. , 2009, American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology.

[7]  Niranchan Paskaranandavadivel,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Electrical Activity in the Gastrointestinal Tract , 2013 .

[8]  S. Haykin,et al.  Adaptive Filter Theory , 1986 .

[9]  G. Farrugia Interstitial cells of Cajal in health and disease , 2008, Neurogastroenterology and motility : the official journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society.

[10]  W. Lammers,et al.  The Principles and Practice of Gastrointestinal High-Resolution Electrical Mapping , 2013 .

[11]  L. Elveback,et al.  Patterns of canine gastric electrical activity. , 1969, The American journal of physiology.

[12]  Leo K. Cheng,et al.  A System and Method for Online High-Resolution Mapping of Gastric Slow-Wave Activity , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  H. Liang,et al.  Artifact reduction in electrogastrogram based on empirical mode decomposition method , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[14]  A. Pullan,et al.  Origin, propagation and regional characteristics of porcine gastric slow wave activity determined by high‐resolution mapping , 2010, Neurogastroenterology and motility : the official journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society.