Heat and the planning system: how can local authorities encourage deployment of low and zero-carbon heating?

There is widespread recognition of the need for new homes to feature only low or zero-carbon (LZC) heating. However, residential developers continue to choose conventional high-carbon options such as natural gas boilers over net-zero compatible alternatives. This study explores how UK local authorities (LAs) within the English planning system can encourage residential developers to deploy LZC heating systems within their projects. We adopt an embedded case study design and analyse 30 residential project proposals within two LA areas. Our study examines local planning policies and interactions between developers and LA officers, along with the resultant outcomes, through documentary analysis and expert interviews with local stakeholders. We find that LAs can encourage developers to adopt LZC heating technologies above and beyond what is required nationally. The conditions for this to occur are (1) a planning policy which restricts allowable heating technology options, (2) empowering LA officers to enforce policies, (3) advice and support for developers to consider alternatives, and where necessary, (4) political backing to challenge unwilling developers. Study findings highlight the important role of LAs in creating the conditions for the transition to LZC heating, which show how they can use powers within the planning system to encourage developers to make low carbon choices without the need for direct investment.

[1]  J. Hall,et al.  The implications of ambitious decarbonisation of heat and road transport for Britain’s net zero carbon energy systems , 2022, Applied Energy.

[2]  G. Shabha,et al.  A qualitative assessment of the impact of smart homes and environmentally beneficial technologies on the UK 2050 net-zero carbon emission target , 2021, Smart and Sustainable Built Environment.

[3]  C. Bale,et al.  Important social and technical factors shaping the prospects for thermal energy storage , 2021 .

[4]  B. Sovacool,et al.  User innovation, niche construction and regime destabilization in heat pump transitions , 2021 .

[5]  J. E. Thorsen,et al.  Perspectives on fourth and fifth generation district heating , 2021, Energy.

[6]  Laurence Stamford,et al.  Net zero in the heating sector: Technological options and environmental sustainability from now to 2050 , 2021 .

[7]  J. Speirs,et al.  Heating in Great Britain: An incumbent discourse coalition resists an electrifying future , 2020 .

[8]  L. Clarke,et al.  Transforming vocational education and training for nearly zero-energy building , 2020, Buildings and Cities.

[9]  K. Janda,et al.  Preparing ‘middle actors’ to deliver zero-carbon building transitions , 2020 .

[10]  Jianzhong Wu,et al.  Hot stuff: Research and policy principles for heat decarbonisation through smart electrification , 2020, Energy Research & Social Science.

[11]  G. Feola.  Capitalism in sustainability transitions research: Time for a critical turn? , 2020, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions.

[12]  C. Mitchell,et al.  Incumbent lobbying as a barrier to forward-looking regulation: The case of demand-side response in the GB capacity market for electricity , 2020 .

[13]  J. Webb,et al.  Governance institutions and prospects for local energy innovation: laggards and leaders among UK local authorities , 2020, Energy Policy.

[14]  J. Barnes,et al.  The economics of heat pumps and the (un)intended consequences of government policy , 2020, Energy Policy.

[15]  S. Rees.  Looking forward to UK low-carbon heating , 2019, Building Services Engineering Research and Technology.

[16]  S. Dekker,et al.  5th generation district heating and cooling systems as a solution for renewable urban thermal energy supply , 2019, Advances in Geosciences.

[17]  Oscar Fitch-Roy,et al.  Policy change, power and the development of Great Britain's Renewable Heat Incentive , 2019, Energy Policy.

[18]  Louis Krog.  How municipalities act under the new paradigm for energy planning , 2019, Sustainable Cities and Society.

[19]  R. Gross,et al.  Path dependency in provision of domestic heating , 2019, Nature Energy.

[20]  Roberto Fedrizzi,et al.  5th generation district heating and cooling systems: A review of existing cases in Europe , 2019, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[21]  W. Upton.  What is the Purpose of Planning Policy? Reflections on the Revised National Planning Policy Framework 2018 , 2019, Journal of Environmental Law.

[22]  A. Barford,et al.  The depths of the cuts: the uneven geography of local government austerity , 2018, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society.

[23]  V. Daioglou,et al.  Simulating the deep decarbonisation of residential heating for limiting global warming to 1.5 °C , 2018, Energy Efficiency.

[24]  C. Bale,et al.  Institutional pathways to municipal energy companies in the UK: Realising co-benefits to mitigate climate change in cities , 2018 .

[25]  J. Schot,et al.  Unpacking the Formation of Favourable Environments for Urban Experimentation: The Case of the Bristol Energy Scene , 2018 .

[26]  A. Gouldson,et al.  The role of intermediaries in low carbon transitions – Empowering innovations to unlock district heating in the UK , 2017 .

[27]  Henrik Lund,et al.  Roles of local and national energy systems in the integration of renewable energy , 2016 .

[28]  C. Bale,et al.  Realising local government visions for developing district heating: Experiences from a learning country , 2016 .

[29]  M. Swilling,et al.  Developmental States and Sustainability Transitions: Prospects of a Just Transition in South Africa , 2016 .

[30]  D. Hawkey,et al.  Governing cities for sustainable energy: The UK case , 2016 .

[31]  Bridget Woodman,et al.  Local authorities as niche actors: the case of energy governance in the UK , 2016 .

[32]  Jianzhong Wu,et al.  Uncertainties in decarbonising heat in the UK , 2015 .

[33]  Bernhard Truffer,et al.  The geography of sustainability transitions: Contours of an emerging theme , 2015 .

[34]  Tim Schwanen,et al.  The Bumpy Road toward Low-Energy Urban Mobility: Case Studies from Two UK Cities , 2015 .

[35]  Paula Kivimaa.  Government-affiliated intermediary organisations as actors in system-level transitions , 2014 .

[36]  F. Geels.  Regime Resistance against Low-Carbon Transitions: Introducing Politics and Power into the Multi-Level Perspective , 2014 .

[37]  P. G. Taylor,et al.  Developing pathways for energy storage in the UK using a coevolutionary framework , 2013 .

[38]  N. Emmel.  Sampling and Choosing Cases in Qualitative Research: A Realist Approach , 2013 .

[39]  Paul E. Dodds,et al.  The future of the UK gas network , 2013 .

[40]  A. Gouldson,et al.  Funding low carbon cities: local perspectives on opportunities and risks , 2013 .

[41]  T. Foxon,et al.  Strategic energy planning within local authorities in the UK: A study of the city of Leeds , 2012 .

[42]  Frans Berkhout,et al.  Space and scale in socio-technical transitions , 2012 .

[43]  B. Truffer,et al.  Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects , 2012 .

[44]  Lars Coenen,et al.  Towards a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions , 2012 .

[45]  Timothy J. Foxon,et al.  Governing Infrastructure Networks for a Low Carbon Economy: Co-Evolution of Technologies and Institutions in UK Electricity Distribution Networks , 2011 .

[46]  K. Sperling,et al.  Centralisation and decentralisation in strategic municipal energy planning in Denmark , 2011 .

[47]  Rpjm Rob Raven,et al.  Strategic Niche Management in an unstable regime: biomass gasification in India. , 2010 .

[48]  F. Geels.  Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective , 2010 .

[49]  M. Hodson,et al.  Can cities shape socio-technical transitions and how would we know if they were? , 2010 .

[50]  F. Geels,et al.  Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways , 2007 .

[51]  F. Geels.  Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study , 2002 .

[52]  W. Arthur,et al.  INCREASING RETURNS AND LOCK-IN BY HISTORICAL EVENTS , 1989 .

[53]  Nigel King,et al.  Template Analysis for Business and Management Students , 2016 .

[54]  Bill Lee,et al.  Using Documents in Organizational Research , 2012 .

[55]  I. Feller.  Technological change. , 1982, Science.