Measurement, testing, and characterization of airborne nanoparticles released from machining of nanoreinforced composites

Abstract Nanoenhanced products are widely being established within industry due to, among others, their lightweight, performance advantages, and ability to meticulously target material properties with great control and precision. Despite the beneficial properties introduced, certain nanofillers have shown conceivable health risks and toxicity to humans and the environment. It is important to fully understand the toxicity associated with nanomaterials, as well as to acknowledge that throughout their lifecycle, nanocomposites will undergo energy input that has the potential for the unintentional release of the particles. A full understanding of the inadvertent release of nanoparticles within the workplace poses unknown risks that are yet to be quantified. So far, however, there is no harmonized conclusion on the particles released and no standardized method established to simulate the release scenarios. While in some cases, synthesis of nanoparticles has shown to not present evidence of clear nanoparticle exposure, processes of high energy input have provided evidence that inhalation exposure occurs. Although the various test guidelines and reports on exposure assessments have made remarkable progress and are available to assist in carrying out an adequate approach, there is no available standard or harmonized method in assessment of nanomaterial release during lifecycle scenarios, particularly machining. The approach, measurement, and sampling techniques used to measure the same release or exposure characteristics can differ quite significantly. Governing bodies are attempting to collate the best methods to help simplify the approach; however, these are currently difficult as not one technique is sufficient to evaluate the release. The guidelines, reports, and frameworks are discussed and have provided a significant set of beneficial principles to follow but emphasize the current lack in a harmonized approach. Due to the variation in approaches reported within literature, this chapter will review the approaches, measurement, and sampling techniques in use.

[1]  K Hungerbühler,et al.  Migration of Ag- and TiO2-(Nano)particles from textiles into artificial sweat under physical stress: experiments and exposure modeling. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  K. N. Sood,et al.  Comparative study of leaching of silver nanoparticles from fabric and effective effluent treatment. , 2012, Journal of environmental sciences.

[3]  Chunsheng Zhao,et al.  Mobility particle size spectrometers: harmonization of technical standards and data structure to facilitate high quality long-term observations of atmospheric particle number size distributions , 2010 .

[4]  Shuji Tsuruoka,et al.  Evaluation of exposure risk in the weaving process of MWCNT-coated yarn with real-time particle concentration measurements and characterization of dust particles. , 2012, Industrial health.

[5]  Bernd Nowack,et al.  Measuring Nanomaterial Release from Carbon Nanotube Composites: Review of the State of the Science , 2015 .

[6]  Hongtao Yu,et al.  Mechanisms of nanotoxicity: Generation of reactive oxygen species , 2014, Journal of food and drug analysis.

[7]  É. Guillaume,et al.  Characterization of aerosol emitted by the combustion of nanocomposites , 2011 .

[8]  J. Njuguna,et al.  Assessment of Nanoparticle Release from Polyamide 6- and Polypropylene-Silicon Composites and Cytotoxicity in Human Lung A549 Cells , 2013, Journal of Inorganic and Organometallic Polymers and Materials.

[9]  X. Gu,et al.  Characterization of surface accumulation and release of nanosilica during irradiation of polymer nanocomposites by ultraviolet light. , 2012, Journal of nanoscience and nanotechnology.

[10]  Mark D. Hoover,et al.  Identification and Characterization of Potential Sources of Worker Exposure to Carbon Nanofibers During Polymer Composite Laboratory Operations , 2007, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[11]  María Henar Miguélez,et al.  Experimental and numerical analysis of step drill bit performance when drilling woven CFRPs , 2018 .

[12]  Tinh Nguyen,et al.  Photo‐induced surface transformations of silica nanocomposites , 2012 .

[13]  M Methner,et al.  Nanoparticle Emission Assessment Technique (NEAT) for the Identification and Measurement of Potential Inhalation Exposure to Engineered Nanomaterials—Part B: Results from 12 Field Studies , 2010, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[14]  K. Saito,et al.  Potential release of carbon nanotubes from their composites during grinding , 2013 .

[15]  M Methner,et al.  Nanoparticle Emission Assessment Technique (NEAT) for the Identification and Measurement of Potential Inhalation Exposure to Engineered Nanomaterials—Part A , 2010, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[16]  Laura Hodson,et al.  Harmonization of measurement strategies for exposure to manufactured nano-objects; report of a workshop. , 2012, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[17]  J. Njuguna,et al.  Measurement and sampling techniques for characterization of airborne nanoparticles released from nano-enhanced products , 2014 .

[18]  J. Njuguna,et al.  A review on the effect of mechanical drilling on polymer nanocomposites , 2014 .

[19]  K Hungerbühler,et al.  Characterization of silver release from commercially available functional (nano)textiles. , 2012, Chemosphere.

[20]  L. Cena,et al.  Characterization and Control of Airborne Particles Emitted During Production of Epoxy/Carbon Nanotube Nanocomposites , 2011, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[21]  J. Njuguna,et al.  Physical characteristics of nanoparticles emitted during drilling of silica based polyamide 6 nanocomposites , 2012 .

[22]  J. Njuguna,et al.  Nanomaterials, nanofillers, and nanocomposites: types and properties , 2021, Health and Environmental Safety of Nanomaterials.

[23]  Araceli Sánchez Jiménez,et al.  A comparison of control banding tools for nanomaterials , 2016, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[24]  Harald F Krug,et al.  Nanosafety research--are we on the right track? , 2014, Angewandte Chemie.

[25]  Ali Mkaddem,et al.  Recent advances in drilling hybrid FRP/Ti composite: A state-of-the-art review , 2016 .

[26]  Nick Collings,et al.  A condensation particle counter insensitive to volatile particles , 2014 .

[27]  Toshiro Hirai,et al.  Amorphous nanosilica induce endocytosis-dependent ROS generation and DNA damage in human keratinocytes , 2011, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[28]  J. Njuguna,et al.  Assessment of nanoparticles release into the environment during drilling of carbon nanotubes/epoxy and carbon nanofibres/epoxy nanocomposites. , 2017, Journal of hazardous materials.

[29]  J. Njuguna,et al.  The effect of nanoclay on dust generation during drilling of PA6 nanocomposites , 2012 .

[30]  C. Geraci,et al.  Evaluation of the Potential Airborne Release of Carbon Nanofibers During the Preparation, Grinding, and Cutting of Epoxy-Based Nanocomposite Material , 2012, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[31]  Michael Stintz,et al.  Method for the characterization of the abrasion induced nanoparticle release into air from surface coatings , 2009 .

[32]  J. Njuguna,et al.  The effect of nanosilica (SiO2) and nanoalumina (Al2O3) reinforced polyester nanocomposites on aerosol nanoparticle emissions into the environment during automated drilling , 2017 .

[33]  Weilong Cong,et al.  A review of mechanical drilling for composite laminates , 2012 .

[34]  J. Njuguna,et al.  Environmental Particle Emissions due to Automated Drilling of Polypropylene Composites and Nanocomposites Reinforced with Talc, Montmorillonite and Wollastonite , 2017 .

[35]  J. Njuguna,et al.  Influence of Reduced Graphene Oxide on Epoxy/Carbon Fiber‐Reinforced Hybrid Composite: Flexural and Shear Properties under Varying Temperature Conditions , 2019, Advanced Engineering Materials.

[36]  M. Faridan,et al.  Co exposure to noise and ototoxic substances in the workplace; an outlook on the EU-OSHA literature review (European agency for safety and health at work) , 2014 .

[37]  F. Hurley,et al.  A Systematic Review of the Routes and Forms of Exposure to Engineered Nanomaterials , 2018, Annals of work exposures and health.

[38]  S. Hankin,et al.  Governance of Nanotechnology: Context, Principles and Challenges , 2016 .

[39]  Darrell R Boverhof,et al.  A review and perspective of existing research on the release of nanomaterials from solid nanocomposites , 2014, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[40]  Kuppan Palaniyandi,et al.  Drilling on fiber reinforced polymer/nanopolymer composite laminates: a review , 2017 .

[41]  Shuji Tsuruoka,et al.  Approach to the Exposure Assessment of MWCNT by Considering Size Distribution and Oxidation Temperature of Elemental Carbon , 2013 .

[42]  J. Antonucci,et al.  Long-term mechanical durability of dental nanocomposites containing amorphous calcium phosphate nanoparticles. , 2012, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part B - Applied biomaterials.

[43]  Christof Asbach,et al.  Nanoparticle exposure at nanotechnology workplaces: A review , 2011, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[44]  C. Santeufemio,et al.  Characterization of Exposures To Nanoscale Particles and Fibers During Solid Core Drilling of Hybrid Carbon Nanotube Advanced Composites , 2010, International journal of occupational and environmental health.

[45]  Frank Nüesch,et al.  Release of carbon nanotubes from an epoxy-based nanocomposite during an abrasion process. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[46]  Araceli Sánchez Jiménez,et al.  Dustiness and Deagglomeration Testing: Interlaboratory Comparison of Systems for Nanoparticle Powders , 2015 .

[47]  A. T. Saber,et al.  Comparison of dust release from epoxy and paint nanocomposites and conventional products during sanding and sawing. , 2014, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[48]  H. Abhyankar,et al.  Measurement of Nanoparticles Release during Drilling of Polymer Nanocomposites , 2015 .

[49]  Delphine Bard,et al.  From workplace air measurement results toward estimates of exposure? Development of a strategy to assess exposure to manufactured nano-objects , 2009 .

[50]  Wojciech Zareba,et al.  Ambient fine particulate air pollution triggers ST-elevation myocardial infarction, but not non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: a case-crossover study , 2014, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[51]  P. Marcus,et al.  Ageing of plasma-mediated coatings with embedded silver nanoparticles on stainless steel: An XPS and ToF-SIMS investigation , 2010 .

[52]  M. Stintz,et al.  Nanoparticle release from nanocomposites due to mechanical treatment at two stages of the life-cycle , 2013 .

[53]  K. Rhee,et al.  A review on carbon nanotubes and graphene as fillers in reinforced polymer nanocomposites , 2015 .

[54]  Bernd Nowack,et al.  Release of TiO2 from paints containing pigment-TiO2 or nano-TiO2 by weathering. , 2013, Environmental science. Processes & impacts.

[55]  Phil Sayre,et al.  Review of achievements of the OECD Working Party on Manufactured Nanomaterials' Testing and Assessment Programme. From exploratory testing to test guidelines. , 2016, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[56]  Delphine Bard,et al.  A Structured Observational Method to Assess Dermal Exposure to Manufactured Nanoparticles: DREAM as an Initial Assessment Tool , 2010, International journal of occupational and environmental health.

[57]  R. Aitken,et al.  Assessing exposure to airborne nanomaterials: Current abilities and future requirements , 2007 .

[58]  HungMin Chein,et al.  Evaluation of nanoparticle emission for TiO2 nanopowder coating materials , 2006 .

[59]  Nadimul Haque Faisal,et al.  Tensile and Flexural Properties of Hybrid Graphene Oxide / Epoxy Carbon Fibre Reinforced Composites , 2017 .

[60]  F. Christensen,et al.  Limitations and information needs for engineered nanomaterial-specific exposure estimation and scenarios: recommendations for improved reporting practices , 2012, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[61]  E. Fréjafon,et al.  Nanosafety by design: risks from nanocomposite/nanowaste combustion , 2013, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[62]  E. Kilickap,et al.  Evaluation of drilling performances of nanocomposites reinforced with graphene and graphene oxide , 2018, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[63]  E. Petersen,et al.  Impact of UV irradiation on multiwall carbon nanotubes in nanocomposites: formation of entangled surface layer and mechanisms of release resistance. , 2017, Carbon.

[64]  K. Hornsby,et al.  A Laboratory Comparison of Real-Time Measurement Methods for 10–100-nm Particle Size Distributions , 2014 .

[65]  Nicklas Raun Jacobsen,et al.  Inflammatory and genotoxic effects of sanding dust generated from nanoparticle-containing paints and lacquers , 2012, Nanotoxicology.

[66]  Pasi Aalto,et al.  The particle detection efficiency of the TSI-3007 condensation particle counter , 2002 .

[67]  M. Riediker,et al.  Nano-object Release During Machining of Polymer-Based Nanocomposites Depends on Process Factors and the Type of Nanofiller , 2017, Annals of work exposures and health.

[68]  Raluca Mihalache,et al.  Occupational exposure limits for manufactured nanomaterials, a systematic review , 2017, Nanotoxicology.

[69]  B. Wardle,et al.  Exposures to nanoscale particles and fibers during handling, processing, and machining of nanocomposites and nanoengineered composites reinforced with aligned carbon nanotubes , 2009 .

[70]  Antonio Marcomini,et al.  Risk assessment of engineered nanomaterials: a review of available data and approaches from a regulatory perspective , 2012, Nanotoxicology.

[71]  Wim H. De Jong,et al.  Development of International Standard on Nano Aerosol Generation for Inhalation Toxicology Study , 2017 .

[72]  J. Verbeek,et al.  A Systematic Review of Reported Exposure to Engineered Nanomaterials. , 2016, The Annals of occupational hygiene.