A comparative copula‐based bivariate frequency analysis of observed and simulated storm events: A case study on Bartlett‐Lewis modeled rainfall

[1] Because of a lack of historical rainfall time series of considerable length, one often has to rely on simulated rainfall time series, e.g., in the design of hydraulic structures. One way to simulate such time series is by means of stochastic point process rainfall models, such as the Bartlett-Lewis type of model. For the evaluation of model performance, with a focus on the reproduction of extreme rainfall events, often a univariate extreme value analysis is performed. Recently developed concepts in statistical hydrology now offer other means of evaluating the overall performance of such models. In this study, a copula-based frequency analysis of storms is proposed as a tool to evaluate differences between the return periods of several types of observed and modeled storms. First, this study performs an analysis of several storm variables, which indicates a problem with the modeling of the temporal structure of rainfall by the models. Thereafter, the bivariate frequency analysis of storms, defined by their duration and volume, illustrates the underestimation and overestimation of the return period of the storms simulated by the models, which is partially explained by a large difference in the marginal distribution functions of the storm duration and storm volume, the difference in the degree of association between the latter, and a different mean storm interarrival time. The proposed methodology allows for the identification of some problems with the rainfall simulations from which recommendations for possible improvements to rainfall models can be made.

[1]  Peter F. Rasmussen,et al.  Bivariate frequency analysis: discussion of some useful concepts in hydrological application , 2002 .

[2]  Rao S. Govindaraju,et al.  Trivariate statistical analysis of extreme rainfall events via the Plackett family of copulas , 2008 .

[3]  Jenq-Tzong Shiau,et al.  Return period of bivariate distributed extreme hydrological events , 2003 .

[4]  P. Willems,et al.  Trends and multidecadal oscillations in rainfall extremes, based on a more than 100‐year time series of 10 min rainfall intensities at Uccle, Belgium , 2008 .

[5]  Chris Kilsby,et al.  A space‐time Neyman‐Scott model of rainfall: Empirical analysis of extremes , 2002 .

[6]  A. Favre,et al.  Metaelliptical copulas and their use in frequency analysis of multivariate hydrological data , 2007 .

[7]  100 years of Belgian rainfall: are there trends? , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[8]  Copula-based mixed models for bivariate rainfall data: an empirical study in regression perspective , 2009 .

[9]  Niko E. C. Verhoest,et al.  Fitting bivariate copulas to the dependence structure between storm characteristics: A detailed analysis based on 105 year 10 min rainfall , 2010 .

[10]  F. Serinaldi,et al.  Design hyetograph analysis with 3-copula function , 2006 .

[11]  Markus Junker,et al.  Estimating the tail-dependence coefficient: Properties and pitfalls , 2005 .

[12]  Vijay P. Singh,et al.  Gumbel–Hougaard Copula for Trivariate Rainfall Frequency Analysis , 2007 .

[13]  Gianfausto Salvadori,et al.  Bivariate return periods via 2-Copulas , 2004 .

[14]  Renzo Rosso,et al.  Bivariate Statistical Approach to Check Adequacy of Dam Spillway , 2005 .

[15]  B. Rémillard,et al.  Goodness-of-fit tests for copulas: A review and a power study , 2006 .

[16]  Francesco Serinaldi,et al.  Asymmetric copula in multivariate flood frequency analysis , 2006 .

[17]  Paul S. P. Cowpertwait,et al.  A generalized spatial-temporal model of rainfall based on a clustered point process , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[18]  C. De Michele,et al.  A Generalized Pareto intensity‐duration model of storm rainfall exploiting 2‐Copulas , 2003 .

[19]  Peter S. Eagleson,et al.  Identification of independent rainstorms , 1982 .

[20]  Francesco Serinaldi,et al.  Fully Nested 3-Copula: Procedure and Application on Hydrological Data , 2007 .

[21]  Valerie Isham,et al.  Some models for rainfall based on stochastic point processes , 1987, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[22]  Anne-Catherine Favre,et al.  Importance of Tail Dependence in Bivariate Frequency Analysis , 2007 .

[23]  Gaston R. Demarée,et al.  Le pluviographe centenaire du plateau d'Uccle: son histoire, ses données et ses applications , 2003 .

[24]  Hayley J. Fowler,et al.  RainSim: A spatial-temporal stochastic rainfall modelling system , 2008, Environ. Model. Softw..

[25]  Niko E. C. Verhoest,et al.  A stochastic design rainfall generator based on copulas and mass curves , 2010 .

[26]  J. Segers,et al.  RANK-BASED INFERENCE FOR BIVARIATE EXTREME-VALUE COPULAS , 2007, 0707.4098.

[27]  G. Evin,et al.  A new rainfall model based on the Neyman‐Scott process using cubic copulas , 2008 .

[28]  Dara Entekhabi,et al.  Parameter estimation and sensitivity analysis for the modified Bartlett‐Lewis rectangular pulses model of rainfall , 1990 .

[29]  Gianfausto Salvadori,et al.  Frequency analysis via copulas: Theoretical aspects and applications to hydrological events , 2004 .

[30]  C. Genest,et al.  Everything You Always Wanted to Know about Copula Modeling but Were Afraid to Ask , 2007 .

[31]  P. Troch,et al.  Evaluation of cluster-based rectangular pulses point process models for rainfall , 1994 .

[32]  H. Wheater,et al.  Improvements to the modelling of British rainfall using a modified Random Parameter Bartlett-Lewis Rectangular Pulse Model , 1994 .

[33]  Vijay P. Singh,et al.  Bivariate rainfall frequency distributions using Archimedean copulas , 2007 .

[34]  N. Verhoest,et al.  Analysis Of A 105‐year time series of precipitation observed at Uccle, Belgium , 2006 .

[35]  Mixed rectangular pulses models of rainfall , 2004 .

[36]  R. Govindaraju,et al.  A bivariate frequency analysis of extreme rainfall with implications for design , 2007 .

[37]  Keith Beven,et al.  An evaluation of three stochastic rainfall models. , 2000 .

[38]  Niko E. C. Verhoest,et al.  On the applicability of Bartlett–Lewis rectangular pulses models in the modeling of design storms at a point , 1997 .

[39]  M. Stephens EDF Statistics for Goodness of Fit and Some Comparisons , 1974 .

[40]  B. Bobée,et al.  Multivariate hydrological frequency analysis using copulas , 2004 .

[41]  V. Isham,et al.  A point process model for rainfall: further developments , 1988, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[42]  C. De Michele,et al.  Statistical characterization of temporal structure of storms , 2006 .

[43]  H. Wheater,et al.  Modelling of British rainfall using a random parameter Bartlett-Lewis Rectangular Pulse Model , 1993 .

[44]  R. Nelsen An Introduction to Copulas , 1998 .

[45]  Jonathan A. Tawn,et al.  Bivariate extreme value theory: Models and estimation , 1988 .

[46]  P.H.A.J.M. van Gelder,et al.  STATISTICAL ESTIMATION METHODS FOR EXTREME HYDROLOGICAL EVENTS , 2006 .

[47]  Paul S. P. Cowpertwait,et al.  A Poisson-cluster model of rainfall: some high-order moments and extreme values , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[48]  A. Bárdossy,et al.  Copula based multisite model for daily precipitation simulation , 2009 .

[49]  Carlo De Michele,et al.  Extremes in Nature : an approach using Copulas , 2007 .

[50]  Christian Onof,et al.  Rainfall modelling using Poisson-cluster processes: a review of developments , 2000 .

[51]  M. Sklar Fonctions de repartition a n dimensions et leurs marges , 1959 .

[52]  Christian Onof,et al.  Point process models of rainfall: developments for fine-scale structure , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[53]  Juan B. Valdés,et al.  Rectangular pulses point process models for rainfall: Analysis of empirical data , 1987 .

[54]  Anastassia Baxevani,et al.  Modelling Precipitation in Sweden using multiple step markov chains and a composite model , 2008 .

[55]  P. Phillips,et al.  Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root? , 1992 .