Speed, Sensitivity, and Bistability in Auto-activating Signaling Circuits

Cells employ a myriad of signaling circuits to detect environmental signals and drive specific gene expression responses. A common motif in these circuits is inducible auto-activation: a transcription factor that activates its own transcription upon activation by a ligand or by post-transcriptional modification. Examples range from the two-component signaling systems in bacteria and plants to the genetic circuits of animal viruses such as HIV. We here present a theoretical study of such circuits, based on analytical calculations, numerical computations, and simulation. Our results reveal several surprising characteristics. They show that auto-activation can drastically enhance the sensitivity of the circuit's response to input signals: even without molecular cooperativity, an ultra-sensitive threshold response can be obtained. However, the increased sensitivity comes at a cost: auto-activation tends to severely slow down the speed of induction, a stochastic effect that was strongly underestimated by earlier deterministic models. This slow-induction effect again requires no molecular cooperativity and is intimately related to the bimodality recently observed in non-cooperative auto-activation circuits. These phenomena pose strong constraints on the use of auto-activation in signaling networks. To achieve both a high sensitivity and a rapid induction, an inducible auto-activation circuit is predicted to acquire low cooperativity and low fold-induction. Examples from Escherichia coli's two-component signaling systems support these predictions.

[1]  J. Ferrell Self-perpetuating states in signal transduction: positive feedback, double-negative feedback and bistability. , 2002, Current opinion in cell biology.

[2]  J. Gunawardena Multisite protein phosphorylation makes a good threshold but can be a poor switch. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  R Thomas,et al.  Dynamical behaviour of biological regulatory networks--I. Biological role of feedback loops and practical use of the concept of the loop-characteristic state. , 1995, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[4]  E. Groisman,et al.  Transcriptional autoregulation of the Salmonella typhimurium phoPQ operon , 1995, Journal of bacteriology.

[5]  Pieter Rein ten Wolde,et al.  Transcriptional Regulation by Competing Transcription Factor Modules , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[6]  R. Bourret,et al.  Two-component signal transduction. , 2010, Current opinion in microbiology.

[7]  A. Yamaguchi,et al.  Indole induces the expression of multidrug exporter genes in Escherichia coli , 2004, Molecular microbiology.

[8]  A. Goldbeter,et al.  Bistability without Hysteresis in Chemical Reaction Systems: A Theoretical Analysis of Irreversible Transitions between Multiple Steady States , 1997 .

[9]  A. McGuire,et al.  Genome-wide Profiling of Promoter Recognition by the Two-component Response Regulator CpxR-P in Escherichia coli * , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[10]  A. Jeltsch,et al.  Horizontal gene transfer contributes to the wide distribution and evolution of type II restriction-modification systems , 1996, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[11]  B. Wanner,et al.  Analysis of regulation of phoB expression using a phoB-cat fusion , 1983, Journal of bacteriology.

[12]  D. Touati,et al.  Anaerobic activation of arcA transcription in Escherichia coli: roles of Fnr and ArcA , 1994, Molecular microbiology.

[13]  Farren J. Isaacs,et al.  Prediction and measurement of an autoregulatory genetic module , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  A. Yamaguchi,et al.  Genome-Wide Analyses of Escherichia coli Gene Expression Responsive to the BaeSR Two-Component Regulatory System , 2005, Journal of bacteriology.

[15]  S. Leibler,et al.  Phenotypic Diversity, Population Growth, and Information in Fluctuating Environments , 2005, Science.

[16]  Michael A Savageau,et al.  Hysteretic and graded responses in bacterial two‐component signal transduction , 2008, Molecular microbiology.

[17]  U. Alon,et al.  Negative autoregulation speeds the response times of transcription networks. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  Indrani Bose,et al.  Positive feedback, stochasticity and genetic competence , 2007, Physical biology.

[19]  Paul J. Choi,et al.  Quantifying E. coli Proteome and Transcriptome with Single-Molecule Sensitivity in Single Cells , 2010, Science.

[20]  R. Blumenthal,et al.  Supplementary data for : Real-time kinetics of restriction-modification gene expression after entry into a new host cell , 2008 .

[21]  M. Thattai,et al.  Intrinsic noise in gene regulatory networks , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Eduardo A. Groisman,et al.  The Pleiotropic Two-Component Regulatory System PhoP-PhoQ , 2001, Journal of bacteriology.

[23]  Naama Barkai,et al.  Noise Propagation and Signaling Sensitivity in Biological Networks: A Role for Positive Feedback , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[24]  B. Séraphin,et al.  Positive feedback in eukaryotic gene networks: cell differentiation by graded to binary response conversion , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[25]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Self-regulating gene: an exact solution. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[26]  Klaus Aktories,et al.  Noise Can Induce Bimodality in Positive Transcriptional Feedback Loops Without Bistability , 2010 .

[27]  S. Kustu,et al.  In vitro interaction of nitrate-responsive regulatory protein NarL with DNA target sequences in the fdnG, narG, narK and frdA operon control regions of Escherichia coli K-12. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[28]  B. Ingalls,et al.  Deterministic characterization of stochastic genetic circuits , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Hirotada Mori,et al.  Identification and Molecular Characterization of the Mg2+ Stimulon of Escherichia coli , 2003, Journal of bacteriology.

[30]  Alexander J. Ninfa,et al.  Context-Dependent Functions of the PII and GlnK Signal Transduction Proteins in Escherichia coli , 2002, Journal of bacteriology.

[31]  A. Keller,et al.  Model genetic circuits encoding autoregulatory transcription factors. , 1995, Journal of theoretical biology.

[32]  V. Sperandio,et al.  Transcriptional autoregulation by quorum sensing Escherichia coli regulators B and C (QseBC) in enterohaemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) , 2005, Molecular microbiology.

[33]  Nir Friedman,et al.  Linking stochastic dynamics to population distribution: an analytical framework of gene expression. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[34]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Understanding stochastic simulations of the smallest genetic networks. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[35]  T. Hwa,et al.  Interdependence of Cell Growth and Gene Expression: Origins and Consequences , 2010, Science.

[36]  M. Tabaka,et al.  Bimodal gene expression in noncooperative regulatory systems , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Mark Goulian,et al.  High stimulus unmasks positive feedback in an autoregulated bacterial signaling circuit , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  H. Mori,et al.  Transcriptional regulation of drug efflux genes by EvgAS, a two-component system in Escherichia coli. , 2003, Microbiology.

[39]  Akira Ishihama,et al.  Transcriptional response of Escherichia coli to external copper , 2005, Molecular microbiology.

[40]  K. F. Tipton,et al.  Biochemical systems analysis: A study of function and design in molecular biology , 1978 .

[41]  E. Groisman,et al.  Positive feedback in cellular control systems , 2008, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[42]  A. Arkin,et al.  Stochastic mechanisms in gene expression. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  A. Keller,et al.  Specifying epigenetic states with autoregulatory transcription factors. , 1994, Journal of theoretical biology.

[44]  Pieter Rein ten Wolde,et al.  Text S 1 : supplementary information for Combinatorial gene regulation using autoregulation , 2010 .

[45]  A. Ishihama,et al.  Characterization of Copper-Inducible Promoters Regulated by CpxA/CpxR in Escherichia coli , 2006, Bioscience, biotechnology, and biochemistry.

[46]  R. Blumenthal,et al.  Regulatory circuit based on autogenous activation-repression: roles of C-boxes and spacer sequences in control of the PvuII restriction-modification system , 2007, Nucleic acids research.

[47]  M. Savageau Comparison of classical and autogenous systems of regulation in inducible operons , 1974, Nature.

[48]  Mireille Ansaldi,et al.  The TorR High-Affinity Binding Site Plays a Key Role in Both torR Autoregulation and torCADOperon Expression in Escherichia coli , 2000, Journal of bacteriology.

[49]  R. Utsumi,et al.  Identification of the promoter region and the transcriptional regulatory sequence of the evgAS operon of Escherichia coli. , 1998, Bioscience, biotechnology, and biochemistry.

[50]  Ofer Biham,et al.  Genetic toggle switch without cooperative binding. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[51]  A. Böck,et al.  The hydH/G Genes from Escherichia coli code for a zinc and lead responsive two-component regulatory system. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[52]  J. McGeehan,et al.  Cooperative binding of the C.AhdI controller protein to the C/R promoter and its role in endonuclease gene expression. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[53]  W. Epstein,et al.  The products of the kdpDE operon are required for expression of the Kdp ATPase of Escherichia coli , 1992, Journal of bacteriology.

[54]  Naotake Ogasawara,et al.  Anaerobic Regulation of Citrate Fermentation by CitAB in Escherichia coli , 2008, Bioscience, biotechnology, and biochemistry.

[55]  K. Makino,et al.  Regulation of the pho regulon in Escherichia coli K-12. Genetic and physiological regulation of the positive regulatory gene phoB. , 1983, Journal of molecular biology.

[56]  E. Groisman,et al.  Positive autoregulation shapes response timing and intensity in two-component signal transduction systems. , 2010, Journal of molecular biology.

[57]  Dongwoo Shin,et al.  A Positive Feedback Loop Promotes Transcription Surge That Jump-Starts Salmonella Virulence Circuit , 2006, Science.