Development of novel combustion risk index for flammable liquids based on unsupervised clustering algorithms

Abstract Current liquid flammability classification mainly relies on flash point and its risk is largely dependent on consequence and probability. However, combustions of liquefied marine fuels have their uniqueness, leading to a less consistent with the common classification. This work aims at classifying flammable liquids in compression ignition engines for further safety evaluation. Besides liquid flammability characteristics, flame propagation and aerosol formulation are considered. Two unsupervised machine learning clustering algorithms, k-means and spectral clustering, are applied to the collected liquid compounds database. To consider both cluster cohesion and separation, the global mean silhouette value is used to find the optimal number of clusters and to evaluate the clustering performance. The results show that the spectral clustering outperforms k-means on classifying the risk ratings for all proposed models, while the clustering accuracy of the optimal model has been doubled by employing spectral clustering algorithm. Moreover, principal component analysis and star coordinate diagrams are presented to visualize high dimensional data to 2-D graphs. Finally, the overall liquid safety performance is evaluated by a novel combustion risk index via the weight values determined by the information entropy approach. This index can be used to explore inherently safer fuels in the process industries.

[1]  M. Mannan,et al.  A Hazard Index for Chemical Logistic Warehouses with Modified Flammability Rating by Machine Learning Methods , 2020 .

[2]  Hongfei Xu,et al.  Machine Learning and Deep Learning in Chemical Health and Safety: A Systematic Review of Techniques and Applications , 2020, ACS Chemical Health & Safety.

[3]  Donald W. Bouldin,et al.  A Cluster Separation Measure , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[4]  M. Mannan,et al.  Predictive correlations for leaking heat transfer fluid aerosols in air , 2003 .

[5]  R C Santon,et al.  MIST FIRES AND EXPLOSIONS – AN INCIDENT SURVEY , 2009 .

[6]  Harold U. Escobar-Hernandez,et al.  Review of recent developments of quantitative structure-property relationship models on fire and explosion-related properties , 2019, Process Safety and Environmental Protection.

[7]  M. Mannan,et al.  Development of Flammable Dispersion Quantitative Property–Consequence Relationship Models Using Extreme Gradient Boosting , 2020 .

[8]  J. Dunn Well-Separated Clusters and Optimal Fuzzy Partitions , 1974 .

[9]  N. Cernansky,et al.  Droplet size and equivalence ratio effects on spark ignition of monodisperse N-heptane and methanol sprays , 1988 .

[10]  Francis R. Bach,et al.  Clusterpath: an Algorithm for Clustering using Convex Fusion Penalties , 2011, ICML.

[11]  T. Reddy Solar thermal energy conversion: Active solar heating systems , 2017 .

[12]  M. M. Elkotb,et al.  Fuel atomization for spray modelling , 1982 .

[13]  C. Polymeropoulos Flame Propagation in Aerosols of Fuel Droplets, Fuel Vapor and Air , 1984 .

[14]  Darell B. Harmon,et al.  Drop sizes from low speed jets , 1955 .

[15]  Nikos A. Vlassis,et al.  The global k-means clustering algorithm , 2003, Pattern Recognit..

[16]  Zeren Jiao,et al.  Machine learning prediction of hydrocarbon mixture lower flammability limits using quantitative structure‐property relationship models , 2020, Process Safety Progress.

[17]  Philip John Bowen,et al.  Combustion hazards posed by the pressurized atomization of high-flashpoint liquids , 1994 .

[18]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[19]  A. Lefebvre,et al.  Ignition and flame quenching of flowing heterogeneous fuel-air mixtures , 1979 .

[20]  Alain Hauchecorne,et al.  Gravity waves in the middle atmosphere observed by Rayleigh lidar: 1. Case studies , 1991 .

[21]  M. El‐Halwagi,et al.  A data-driven study of IMO compliant fuel emissions with consideration of black carbon aerosols , 2020 .

[22]  Chenxi Ji,et al.  Experimental and thermodynamic study of aerosol explosions in a 36 L apparatus , 2019, Fuel.

[23]  Yue Sun,et al.  Liquid flammability ratings predicted by machine learning considering aerosolization. , 2019, Journal of hazardous materials.

[24]  P. Rousseeuw Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis , 1987 .

[25]  Qingsheng Wang,et al.  Development of machine learning based prediction models for hazardous properties of chemical mixtures , 2020, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries.

[26]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  On Spectral Clustering: Analysis and an algorithm , 2001, NIPS.

[27]  Ulrike von Luxburg,et al.  A tutorial on spectral clustering , 2007, Stat. Comput..

[28]  Liwen Liu,et al.  Application of the Entropy Weight and TOPSIS Method in Safety Evaluation of Coal Mines , 2011 .

[29]  Chad V. Mashuga,et al.  A review of aerosol flammability and explosion related incidents, standards, studies, and risk analysis , 2021 .

[30]  J. McQuaid Design of the thorney island continuous release trials , 1987 .

[31]  M. Mannan,et al.  The use of aerosol formation, flammability, and explosion information for heat-transfer fluid selection. , 2003, Journal of hazardous materials.

[32]  Eser Kandogan Star Coordinates: A Multi-dimensional Visualization Technique with Uniform Treatment of Dimensions , 2000 .