OPERA: a novel method to reduce ghost and aliasing artifacts

A method for Orthogonal Phase Encoding Reduction of Artifact (OPERA) was developed and tested. Because the position of ghosts and aliasing artifacts is predictable along columns or rows, OPERA combines the intensity values of two images acquired using the same parameters, but with swapped phase-encoding directions, to correct the artifacts. Simulations and phantom experiments were conducted to define the efficacy, robustness, and reproducibility. Clinical validation was performed on a total of 1003 images by comparing the OPERA-corrected images and the corresponding image standard in terms of Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) and Contrast-to-Noise Ratio (CNR). The method efficacy was also rated using a Likert-type scale response by two experienced independent radiologists using a single-blinded procedure. Simulations and phantom experiments demonstrated the robustness and effectiveness of OPERA in reducing artifacts strength. OPERA application did not significantly change the SNR [+ 4.16%; inter-quartile range (IQR): 2.72–5.01%] and CNR (+ 4.30%; IQR: 2.86–6.04%) values. The two radiologists observed a total of 893 original images with artifacts (89.03% of the total images), a reduction in the perceived artifacts of 82.0% and 83.9% (p < 0.0001), and an improvement in the perceived SNR (82.8% and 88.5%; K = 0.714) and perceived CNR (86.9–88.9%; K = 0.722). The study demonstrated that OPERA reduces MR artifacts and improves the perceived image quality.

[1]  R M Henkelman,et al.  Two‐point interference method for suppression of ghost artifacts due to motion , 1993, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[2]  P. Bones,et al.  MRI with TRELLIS: a novel approach to motion correction. , 2008, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[3]  Ralph T. Wynn,et al.  Artifacts in Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging. , 2016, Current problems in diagnostic radiology.

[4]  A. Macovski Noise in MRI , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  M. Zaitsev,et al.  Motion artifacts in MRI: A complex problem with many partial solutions , 2015, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[6]  N. Otsu A threshold selection method from gray level histograms , 1979 .

[7]  Luigi Landini,et al.  Automatic 2D registration of renal perfusion image sequences by mutual information and adaptive prediction , 2013, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[8]  Armando Manduca,et al.  Motion correction using the k‐space phase difference of orthogonal acquisitions , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  Raja Muthupillai,et al.  An orthogonal correlation algorithm for ghost reduction in MRI , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  Pedro F Ferreira,et al.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance artefacts , 2013, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[11]  Yoshimi Anzai,et al.  Toward Quantifying the Prevalence, Severity, and Cost Associated With Patient Motion During Clinical MR Examinations. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[12]  Oliver Speck,et al.  Prospective motion correction in brain imaging: A review , 2013, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  Giulio Giovannetti,et al.  Structured errors in reconstruction methods for Non-Cartesian MR data , 2013, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[14]  J G Pipe,et al.  PROPELLER MRI: Clinical testing of a novel technique for quantification and compensation of head motion , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[15]  Juerg Schwitter,et al.  Current artefacts in cardiac and chest magnetic resonance imaging: tips and tricks. , 2016, The British journal of radiology.

[16]  Dong Liang,et al.  Improving GRAPPA using cross‐sampled autocalibration data , 2012, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  Joachim Hornegger,et al.  Prospective optical motion correction for 3D time‐of‐flight angiography , 2013, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  N Jon Shah,et al.  High‐performance computing MRI simulations , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  Satoru Morita,et al.  Aliasing artifacts with the BLADE technique: Causes and effective suppression , 2011, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[20]  E. McVeigh,et al.  Signal-to-noise measurements in magnitude images from NMR phased arrays , 1997, Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 'Magnificent Milestones and Emerging Opportunities in Medical Engineering' (Cat. No.97CH36136).

[21]  Santiago Aja-Fernández,et al.  Noise estimation in parallel MRI: GRAPPA and SENSE. , 2014, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[22]  Frank G. Zöllner,et al.  Image registration in dynamic renal MRI—current status and prospects , 2019, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.