Emerging themes and unifying concepts underlying cell behavior regulation by the pericellular space.

Cells reside in a complex three-dimensional (3D) microenvironment where physical, chemical, and architectural features of the pericellular space regulate important cellular functions like migration, differentiation, and morphogenesis. A major goal of tissue engineering is to identify which properties of the pericellular space orchestrate these emergent cell behaviors and how. In this review, we highlight recent studies at the interface of biomaterials and single cell biophysics that are lending deeper insight towards this goal. Advanced methods have enabled the decoupling of architectural and mechanical features of the microenvironment, revealing multiple mechanisms of adhesion and mechanosensing modulation by biomaterials. Such studies are revealing important roles for pericellular space degradability, hydration, and adhesion competition in cell shape, volume, and differentiation regulation. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Cell fate and function are closely regulated by the local extracellular microenvironment. Advanced methods at the interface of single cell biophysics and biomaterials have shed new light on regulators of cell-pericellular space interactions by decoupling more features of the complex pericellular milieu than ever before. These findings lend deeper mechanistic insight into how biomaterials can be designed to fine-tune outcomes like differentiation, migration, and collective morphogenesis.

[1]  B. Fabry,et al.  Migration in Confined 3D Environments Is Determined by a Combination of Adhesiveness, Nuclear Volume, Contractility, and Cell Stiffness. , 2015, Biophysical journal.

[2]  D. Mooney,et al.  Hydrogel substrate stress-relaxation regulates the spreading and proliferation of mouse myoblasts. , 2017, Acta biomaterialia.

[3]  Robert B West,et al.  Matrix mechanical plasticity regulates cancer cell migration through confining microenvironments , 2018, Nature Communications.

[4]  R. Bonnecaze,et al.  Extracellular matrix stiffness and architecture govern intracellular rheology in cancer. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[5]  J. Howard,et al.  Structural Biology: Piezo Senses Tension through Curvature , 2018, Current Biology.

[6]  Hongyuan Jiang,et al.  Shape and Dynamics of Adhesive Cells: Mechanical Response of Open Systems. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[7]  R. Fernandez-Gonzalez,et al.  Cell–cell and cell–extracellular matrix adhesions cooperate to organize actomyosin networks and maintain force transmission during dorsal closure , 2017, Molecular biology of the cell.

[8]  David W. Colby,et al.  Designing well-defined photopolymerized synthetic matrices for three-dimensional culture and differentiation of induced pluripotent stem cells. , 2018, Biomaterials science.

[9]  K. Anseth,et al.  Biophysically Defined and Cytocompatible Covalently Adaptable Networks as Viscoelastic 3D Cell Culture Systems , 2014, Advances in Materials.

[10]  H. Carter,et al.  3D collagen architecture induces a conserved migratory and transcriptional response linked to vasculogenic mimicry , 2017, Nature Communications.

[11]  Anna Haeger,et al.  Cell jamming: collective invasion of mesenchymal tumor cells imposed by tissue confinement. , 2014, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[12]  Amelia Ahmad Khalili,et al.  A Review of Cell Adhesion Studies for Biomedical and Biological Applications , 2015, International journal of molecular sciences.

[13]  R. Mayor,et al.  In vivo confinement promotes collective migration of neural crest cells , 2022 .

[14]  Stephanie J Bryant,et al.  Controlling the spatial distribution of ECM components in degradable PEG hydrogels for tissue engineering cartilage. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[15]  A. Dittmore,et al.  Internal strain drives spontaneous periodic buckling in collagen and regulates remodeling , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  May Win Naing,et al.  Applying macromolecular crowding to 3D bioprinting: fabrication of 3D hierarchical porous collagen-based hydrogel constructs. , 2018, Biomaterials science.

[17]  J. Kashef,et al.  Cadherin-11 promotes neural crest cell spreading by reducing intracellular tension-Mapping adhesion and mechanics in neural crest explants by atomic force microscopy. , 2018, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[18]  T. Irving,et al.  Microfibrillar structure of type I collagen in situ. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  Scott J Hollister,et al.  Mechanical and biochemical assessments of three-dimensional poly(1,8-octanediol-co-citrate) scaffold pore shape and permeability effects on in vitro chondrogenesis using primary chondrocytes. , 2010, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[20]  V. Thomas,et al.  Fiber length and concentration: Synergistic effect on mechanical and cellular response in wet-laid poly(lactic acid) fibrous scaffolds. , 2019, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[21]  H. Ijima,et al.  Fabrication of liver-derived extracellular matrix nanofibers and functional evaluation in in vitro culture using primary hepatocytes , 2018, Materialia.

[22]  Olga Antipova,et al.  Collagen fibril architecture, domain organization, and triple-helical conformation govern its proteolysis , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Masaki Sasai,et al.  Liquid-like behavior of chromatin. , 2016, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[24]  Liliang Ouyang,et al.  Norbornene-modified poly(glycerol sebacate) as a photocurable and biodegradable elastomer , 2017 .

[25]  A. Theocharis,et al.  Extracellular matrix structure. , 2016, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[26]  Dennis E Discher,et al.  How deeply cells feel: methods for thin gels , 2010, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[27]  J. Gautrot,et al.  Adhesive ligand tether length affects the size and length of focal adhesions and influences cell spreading and attachment , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[28]  Jason A. Burdick,et al.  Local nascent protein deposition and remodeling guide mesenchymal stromal cell mechanosensing and fate in three-dimensional hydrogels , 2019, Nature Materials.

[29]  Kevin W Eliceiri,et al.  Contact guidance mediated three-dimensional cell migration is regulated by Rho/ROCK-dependent matrix reorganization. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[30]  G. Duruksu,et al.  Mesenchymal stem cells and ligand incorporation in biomimetic poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels significantly improve insulin secretion from pancreatic islets , 2017, Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

[31]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Flow and magnetic field induced collagen alignment. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[32]  Xavier Trepat,et al.  Mechanosensing of substrate thickness. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[33]  J. McGrath Cell Spreading: The Power to Simplify , 2007, Current Biology.

[34]  Brendon M. Baker,et al.  Matrix degradability controls multicellularity of 3D cell migration , 2017, Nature Communications.

[35]  Y. C. Shin,et al.  Aligned laminin core-polydioxanone/collagen shell fiber matrices effective for neuritogenesis , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[36]  Padmini Rangamani,et al.  Geometric control of frequency modulation of cAMP oscillations due to Ca2+-bursts in dendritic spines , 2019, bioRxiv.

[37]  V. Weaver,et al.  Extracellular matrix assembly: a multiscale deconstruction , 2014, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[38]  Lucas R. Smith,et al.  Mechanosensing of matrix by stem cells: From matrix heterogeneity, contractility, and the nucleus in pore-migration to cardiogenesis and muscle stem cells in vivo. , 2017, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[39]  Stephanie I. Fraley,et al.  A distinctive role for focal adhesion proteins in three-dimensional cell motility , 2010, Nature Cell Biology.

[40]  Sean X. Sun,et al.  Role of membrane-tension gated Ca2+ flux in cell mechanosensation , 2018, Journal of Cell Science.

[41]  G. Fields,et al.  Human matrix metalloproteinase specificity studies using collagen sequence-based synthetic peptides. , 1996, Biopolymers.

[42]  Susan X. Hsiong,et al.  Nanoscale cell adhesion ligand presentation regulates nonviral gene delivery and expression. , 2007, Nano letters.

[43]  M. Hacker,et al.  Artificial extracellular matrices support cell growth and matrix synthesis of human dermal fibroblasts in macroporous 3D scaffolds , 2017, Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

[44]  J. Czernuszka,et al.  Macrophage-mediated degradation of crosslinked collagen scaffolds. , 2011, Acta biomaterialia.

[45]  Hanna Y. Irie,et al.  Antioxidant and oncogene rescue of metabolic defects caused by loss of matrix attachment , 2009, Nature.

[46]  H. Guillou,et al.  Spatial organization of the extracellular matrix regulates cell–cell junction positioning , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  S. Sen,et al.  MMP proteolytic activity regulates cancer invasiveness by modulating integrins , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[48]  Shaofan Li,et al.  Modeling universal dynamics of cell spreading on elastic substrates , 2015, Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology.

[49]  J. Konen,et al.  Local alignment vectors reveal cancer cell-induced ECM fiber remodeling dynamics , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[50]  Hai-Bin Yu,et al.  Suitable parameter choice on quantitative morphology of A549 cell in epithelial–mesenchymal transition , 2015, Bioscience reports.

[51]  Brian D Cosgrove,et al.  Cross-Linking Chemistry of Tyramine-Modified Hyaluronan Hydrogels Alters Mesenchymal Stem Cell Early Attachment and Behavior. , 2017, Biomacromolecules.

[52]  Anh Tuan Nguyen,et al.  From nano to micro: topographical scale and its impact on cell adhesion, morphology and contact guidance , 2016, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[53]  R. Waugh,et al.  Nanoscale physicochemical properties of chain- and step-growth polymerized PEG hydrogels affect cell-material interactions. , 2017, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[54]  James C. Weaver,et al.  Hydrogels with tunable stress relaxation regulate stem cell fate and activity , 2015, Nature materials.

[55]  Maximilian Billmann,et al.  Integrating genetic and protein-protein interaction networks maps a functional wiring diagram of a cell. , 2018, Current opinion in microbiology.

[56]  Kristopher E Kubow,et al.  Reducing background fluorescence reveals adhesions in 3D matrices , 2012, Nature Cell Biology.

[57]  R. Petrie,et al.  Intracellular Pressure: A Driver of Cell Morphology and Movement. , 2018, International review of cell and molecular biology.

[58]  S. Zahler,et al.  Contractility as a global regulator of cellular morphology, velocity, and directionality in low-adhesive fibrillary micro-environments. , 2016, Biomaterials.

[59]  Leah Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  From simple to detailed models for cell polarization , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[60]  M. Manning,et al.  Knowing the Boundaries: Extending the Differential Adhesion Hypothesis in Embryonic Cell Sorting , 2012, Science.

[61]  Manish J. Butte,et al.  Strain-enhanced stress relaxation impacts nonlinear elasticity in collagen gels , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[62]  David J Mooney,et al.  Cell volume change through water efflux impacts cell stiffness and stem cell fate , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[63]  Andres J Garcia,et al.  Nanoscale engineering of extracellular matrix-mimetic bioadhesive surfaces and implants for tissue engineering. , 2011, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[64]  Lei Tao,et al.  Cytotoxicity study of polyethylene glycol derivatives , 2017 .

[65]  H. Salvesen,et al.  Distribution volumes of macromolecules in human ovarian and endometrial cancers--effects of extracellular matrix structure. , 2015, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[66]  Integrins and cadherins join forces to form adhesive networks , 2011, Journal of Cell Science.

[67]  Ovijit Chaudhuri,et al.  3D Cell Culture in Interpenetrating Networks of Alginate and rBM Matrix. , 2017, Methods in molecular biology.

[68]  Hunter L. Elliott,et al.  Coordinated integrin activation by actin-dependent force during T-cell migration , 2016, Nature Communications.

[69]  Joachim Kohn,et al.  Cytoskeleton-based forecasting of stem cell lineage fates , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[70]  J. Israelachvili Intermolecular and surface forces , 1985 .

[71]  Sean X. Sun,et al.  Cell tension and mechanical regulation of cell volume , 2018, Molecular biology of the cell.

[72]  P. Gottlieb A Tour de Force: The Discovery, Properties, and Function of Piezo Channels. , 2017, Current topics in membranes.

[73]  D A Weitz,et al.  Universal behavior of the osmotically compressed cell and its analogy to the colloidal glass transition , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[74]  J. Ramshaw,et al.  Induction of procollagen processing in fibroblast cultures by neutral polymers. , 1986, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[75]  D. Mooney,et al.  Presentation of BMP-2 mimicking peptides in 3D hydrogels directs cell fate commitment in osteoblasts and mesenchymal stem cells. , 2014, Biomacromolecules.

[76]  M. Davidson,et al.  Integrin-mediated traction force enhances paxillin molecular associations and adhesion dynamics that increase the invasiveness of tumor cells into a three-dimensional extracellular matrix , 2017, Molecular biology of the cell.

[77]  M. Raghunath,et al.  Tuning the architecture of three-dimensional collagen hydrogels by physiological macromolecular crowding. , 2014, Acta biomaterialia.

[78]  K. Lee,et al.  Effect of spacer arm length between adhesion ligand and alginate hydrogel on stem cell differentiation. , 2016, Carbohydrate polymers.

[79]  D. Case,et al.  Revealing Accessibility of Cryptic Protein Binding Sites within the Functional Collagen Fibril , 2017, Biomolecules.

[80]  Michael Raghunath,et al.  Collagen matrix deposition is dramatically enhanced in vitro when crowded with charged macromolecules: The biological relevance of the excluded volume effect , 2007, FEBS letters.

[81]  Christopher D. Davidson,et al.  Cell force-mediated matrix reorganization underlies multicellular network assembly , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[82]  Christian M. Metallo,et al.  3D collagen architecture regulates cell adhesion through degradability, thereby controlling metabolic and oxidative stress. , 2019, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[83]  S. J. Shefelbine,et al.  Structure–mechanics relationships of collagen fibrils in the osteogenesis imperfecta mouse model , 2015, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[84]  Toshiro Ohashi,et al.  Cytoskeletal tension modulates MMP-1 gene expression from tenocytes on micropillar substrates. , 2013, Journal of biomechanics.

[85]  K. DeMali,et al.  Force transmission at cell-cell and cell-matrix adhesions. , 2014, Biochemistry.

[86]  D. Mooney,et al.  Hydrolytically-degradable click-crosslinked alginate hydrogels. , 2018, Biomaterials.

[87]  Jeong Eun Song,et al.  Development of poly(lactide‐co‐glycolide) scaffold‐impregnated small intestinal submucosa with pores that stimulate extracellular matrix production in disc regeneration , 2014, Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

[88]  Sean X. Sun,et al.  Cellular pressure and volume regulation and implications for cell mechanics. , 2013, Biophysical journal.

[89]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  At the leading edge of three-dimensional cell migration , 2012, Journal of Cell Science.

[90]  R. Superfine,et al.  Vinculin phosphorylation differentially regulates mechanotransduction at cell–cell and cell–matrix adhesions , 2014, The Journal of cell biology.

[91]  Mark A J Chaplain,et al.  Computational modeling of single-cell migration: the leading role of extracellular matrix fibers. , 2012, Biophysical journal.

[92]  D. Lombardo,et al.  Interplay between cadherins and α2β1 integrin differentially regulates melanoma cell invasion , 2015, British Journal of Cancer.

[93]  S. Svetina,et al.  A Model of Piezo1-Based Regulation of Red Blood Cell Volume. , 2019, Biophysical journal.

[94]  Leah Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  Coupling mechanical tension and GTPase signaling to generate cell and tissue dynamics , 2018, Physical biology.

[95]  Ovijit Chaudhuri,et al.  Stress relaxing hyaluronic acid-collagen hydrogels promote cell spreading, fiber remodeling, and focal adhesion formation in 3D cell culture. , 2018, Biomaterials.

[96]  Mehrdad Mehrbod,et al.  On the activation of integrin αIIbβ3: outside-in and inside-out pathways. , 2013, Biophysical journal.

[97]  Andrew Callan-Jones,et al.  Confinement and Low Adhesion Induce Fast Amoeboid Migration of Slow Mesenchymal Cells , 2015, Cell.

[98]  Jangwook P. Jung,et al.  Engineering Breast Cancer Microenvironments and 3D Bioprinting , 2018, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol..

[99]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Mechanical feedback between membrane tension and dynamics. , 2012, Trends in cell biology.

[100]  A. Engler,et al.  Macromolecular crowding tunes 3D collagen architecture and cell morphogenesis. , 2019, Biomaterials science.

[101]  Li Yang,et al.  Mechanosensing of cells in 3D gel matrices based on natural and synthetic materials , 2014, Cell biology international.

[102]  Farshid Guilak,et al.  Micro-scale and meso-scale architectural cues cooperate and compete to direct aligned tissue formation. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[103]  Dihua Yu,et al.  Cancer cell stiffness: integrated roles of three-dimensional matrix stiffness and transforming potential. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[104]  S. Sen,et al.  Multicompartment cell-based modeling of confined migration: regulation by cell intrinsic and extrinsic factors , 2018, Molecular biology of the cell.

[105]  A. Patapoutian,et al.  Piezo1 links mechanical forces to red blood cell volume , 2015, eLife.

[106]  W. Tsai,et al.  Modification and crosslinking of gelatin-based biomaterials as tissue adhesives. , 2019, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[107]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Mechanosensing via cell-matrix adhesions in 3D microenvironments. , 2016, Experimental cell research.

[108]  C. Heisenberg,et al.  An Effective Feedback Loop between Cell-Cell Contact Duration and Morphogen Signaling Determines Cell Fate. , 2017, Developmental cell.

[109]  K. Stroka,et al.  Physical confinement alters tumor cell adhesion and migration phenotypes , 2012, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[110]  Rakesh K Jain,et al.  Mechanical compression drives cancer cells toward invasive phenotype , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[111]  D. Discher,et al.  Cell responses to the mechanochemical microenvironment--implications for regenerative medicine and drug delivery. , 2007, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[112]  Roger D Kamm,et al.  Computational modeling of three-dimensional ECM-rigidity sensing to guide directed cell migration , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[113]  Sean X. Sun,et al.  Going with the Flow: Water Flux and Cell Shape during Cytokinesis. , 2017, Biophysical journal.

[114]  J Parkinson,et al.  Simple physical model of collagen fibrillogenesis based on diffusion limited aggregation. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[115]  Prashanth Asuri,et al.  Three‐dimensional matrix stiffness and adhesive ligands affect cancer cell response to toxins , 2016, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[116]  W. Huck,et al.  3D microniches reveal the importance of cell size and shape , 2017, Nature Communications.

[117]  Daniel S. Reynolds,et al.  Characterization of the mechanical properties of cancer cells in 3D matrices in response to collagen concentration and cytoskeletal inhibitors. , 2018, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[118]  Y. Feldman,et al.  Dielectric Relaxation of Hydration Water in Native Collagen Fibrils. , 2017, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[119]  Felicia C. Loe,et al.  Applying macromolecular crowding to enhance extracellular matrix deposition and its remodeling in vitro for tissue engineering and cell-based therapies. , 2011, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[120]  J. Galle,et al.  Adhesion forces and cortical tension couple cell proliferation and differentiation to drive epidermal stratification , 2017, Nature Cell Biology.

[121]  M. Raghunath,et al.  ECM microenvironment unlocks brown adipogenic potential of adult human bone marrow-derived MSCs , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[122]  S. Piccolo,et al.  YAP/TAZ upstream signals and downstream responses , 2018, Nature Cell Biology.

[123]  Wesley R. Legant,et al.  Degradation-mediated cellular traction directs stem cell fate in covalently crosslinked three-dimensional hydrogels , 2013, Nature materials.

[124]  Vasif Hasirci,et al.  Micro and Nanofabrication methods to control cell-substrate interactions and cell behavior: A review from the tissue engineering perspective , 2018, Bioactive materials.

[125]  Denis Wirtz,et al.  Modeling the two-way feedback between contractility and matrix realignment reveals a nonlinear mode of cancer cell invasion , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[126]  Grégory Giannone,et al.  Dynamic phase transitions in cell spreading. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[127]  Kevin A. Rocco,et al.  Development of Small Diameter Nanofiber Tissue Engineered Arterial Grafts , 2015, PloS one.

[128]  Manuela Schmidt,et al.  Piezo1 and Piezo2 Are Essential Components of Distinct Mechanically Activated Cation Channels , 2010, Science.

[129]  Umberto Tarantino,et al.  Nanoscale Architecture for Controlling Cellular Mechanoresponse in Musculoskeletal Tissues , 2018 .

[130]  Albert Jin,et al.  Local 3D matrix microenvironment regulates cell migration through spatiotemporal dynamics of contractility-dependent adhesions , 2015, Nature Communications.

[131]  S. Corbett,et al.  Fibronectin Matrix Assembly Regulates α5β1-mediated Cell Cohesion , 2003 .

[132]  M. Horne,et al.  Review Paper: A Review of the Cellular Response on Electrospun Nanofibers for Tissue Engineering , 2009, Journal of biomaterials applications.

[133]  M. S. Steinberg,et al.  Differential adhesion in model systems , 2013, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology.

[134]  W. Huck,et al.  Cellular Volume and Matrix Stiffness Direct Stem Cell Behavior in a 3D Microniche , 2018, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[135]  S. Severi,et al.  Computational Models of Ventricular- and Atrial-Like Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Derived Cardiomyocytes , 2013, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[136]  Patrick T. Caswell,et al.  Actin-Based Cell Protrusion in a 3D Matrix , 2018, Trends in cell biology.

[137]  C. Wilhelm,et al.  Successful chondrogenesis within scaffolds, using magnetic stem cell confinement and bioreactor maturation. , 2016, Acta biomaterialia.

[138]  Z. Werb,et al.  Remodelling the extracellular matrix in development and disease , 2014, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[139]  Y. Tabata,et al.  In vivo degradability of hydrogels prepared from different gelatins by various cross-linking methods , 2005, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[140]  Ravi Iyengar,et al.  Mechanisms controlling cell size and shape during isotropic cell spreading. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[141]  G. Rodrigues,et al.  In vitro and in vivo evaluation of electrospun nanofibers of PCL, chitosan and gelatin: a comparative study. , 2015, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[142]  Daniel S. Reynolds,et al.  Mechanical confinement via a PEG/Collagen interpenetrating network inhibits behavior characteristic of malignant cells in the triple negative breast cancer cell line MDA.MB.231. , 2018, Acta biomaterialia.

[143]  M. S. Steinberg,et al.  Differential adhesion in morphogenesis: a modern view. , 2007, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[144]  M. Stevens,et al.  Harnessing the secreted extracellular matrix to engineer tissues , 2020, Nature Biomedical Engineering.

[145]  J Amédée,et al.  Function of linear and cyclic RGD-containing peptides in osteoprogenitor cells adhesion process. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[146]  Ravi Iyengar,et al.  Cell Shape and Negative Links in Regulatory Motifs Together Control Spatial Information Flow in Signaling Networks , 2008, Cell.

[147]  Leah Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  A Comparison of Computational Models for Eukaryotic Cell Shape and Motility , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[148]  U. Schumacher,et al.  Regulation of cell volume by glycosaminoglycans , 2012, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[149]  J. Burdick,et al.  Dimensionality and spreading influence MSC YAP/TAZ signaling in hydrogel environments. , 2016, Biomaterials.

[150]  D. Bilder,et al.  A Cell Migration Tracking Tool Supports Coupling of Tissue Rotation to Elongation. , 2017, Cell reports.

[151]  Denis Wirtz,et al.  Mapping local matrix remodeling induced by a migrating tumor cell using three-dimensional multiple-particle tracking. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[152]  G. Danuser,et al.  Integrin-dependent actomyosin contraction regulates epithelial cell scattering , 2005, The Journal of cell biology.

[153]  Stephanie I. Fraley,et al.  Three-dimensional matrix fiber alignment modulates cell migration and MT1-MMP utility by spatially and temporally directing protrusions , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[154]  J. Samitier,et al.  An Interplay between Matrix Anisotropy and Actomyosin Contractility Regulates 3D‐Directed Cell Migration , 2017 .

[155]  Sean X. Sun,et al.  Active Biochemical Regulation of Cell Volume and a Simple Model of Cell Tension Response. , 2015, Biophysical journal.

[156]  Donald E Ingber,et al.  Tensegrity and mechanotransduction. , 2008, Journal of bodywork and movement therapies.

[157]  J. Kohn,et al.  Tissue spreading on implantable substrates is a competitive outcome of cell–cell vs. cell–substratum adhesivity , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[158]  Manuel Théry,et al.  The Universal Dynamics of Cell Spreading , 2007, Current Biology.

[159]  Padmini Rangamani,et al.  Design principles for robust vesiculation in clathrin-mediated endocytosis , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[160]  M. Ohba,et al.  Effect of cyclic RGD peptide on cell adhesion and tumor metastasis. , 1991, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[161]  He Lian,et al.  Fabrication, characterization and osteoblast responses of poly (octanediol citrate)/bioglass nanofiber composites. , 2018, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[162]  C. Mierke,et al.  Corrigendum: Focal adhesion kinase activity is required for actomyosin contractility-based invasion of cells into dense 3D matrices , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[163]  Ravi Iyengar,et al.  Decoding Information in Cell Shape , 2013, Cell.

[164]  V. Guarino,et al.  HepG2 and human healthy hepatocyte in vitro culture and co-culture in PCL electrospun platforms , 2017, Biomedical materials.

[165]  Sean X. Sun,et al.  Volume regulation and shape bifurcation in the cell nucleus , 2015, Journal of Cell Science.

[166]  P. Bertics,et al.  Regulation of keratinocyte signaling and function via changes in epidermal growth factor presentation. , 2010, Acta biomaterialia.

[167]  P. Price,et al.  The Size Exclusion Characteristics of Type I Collagen , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[168]  P. Kongtawelert,et al.  In vitro human chondrocyte culture on plasma-treated poly(glycerol sebacate) scaffolds , 2015, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[169]  J. Friedrichs,et al.  Macromolecular crowding for tailoring tissue-derived fibrillated matrices. , 2017, Acta biomaterialia.