A comparison of the performance of three visual evoked potential-based methods to estimate visual acuity

PurposeTo compare visual acuities estimated by three methods of visual evoked potential (VEP) recordings to those obtained by two subjective measures [ETDRS and FrACT (Freiburg acuity test)].MethodsTen healthy subjects, aged between 26 and 67 years (mean 43.5), were examined. Best-corrected acuity determined by the ETDRS was between 0.03 and −0.3 logMAR (mean −0.06). Sweep VEPs (sweepVEP), pattern appearance VEPs (pappVEP) and steady-state VEPs (ssVEP) were recorded with two electrode placements (10–20 and Laplace) with best optical correction and with artificially degraded vision using five Bangerter occlusion foils, reducing acuity to about 0.1, 0.22, 0.52, 0.7 and 1.0 logMAR (0.8, 0.6, 0.3, 0.2 and 0.1 decimal scale). Two runs were performed.ResultsETDRS and FrACT acuities showed good agreement, even though ETDRS seemed to underestimate acuity compared with FrACT at higher acuities. Laplace derivation did not improve any of the VEP-estimated acuities over the 10–20. SweepVEP tended to overestimate lower FrACT acuities, but showed good repeatability. PappVEP placed FrACT acuities into correct or neighboring categories in 87 % of cases. Average ssVEP acuity showed little difference to those of FrACT but variance was larger. ROC analysis for typical clinical application showed good performance for all three methods.ConclusionsThe two subjective measurements of acuities are well correlated. Under the conditions of our experiment, sweepVEP results were less variable and had a better repeatability than ssVEP acuities, whose analysis, in contrast to sweepVEP, can be automated. PappVEP estimates, however, offer a viable alternative, that is, quicker but of lower performance regarding the detection of low acuity thresholds. All methods had a good performance regarding minimum acuity detection if an average of two runs is used.

[1]  F. Campbell,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for the existence of orientation and size detectors in the human visual system , 1970, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  K Nakayama,et al.  Rapid assessment of visual function: an electronic sweep technique for the pattern visual evoked potential. , 1979, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[3]  M. Bach,et al.  Resolving the clinical acuity categories “hand motion” and “counting fingers” using the Freiburg Visual Acuity Test (FrACT) , 2008, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[4]  Wolfgang Wesemann.  [Visual acuity measured via the Freiburg visual acuity test (FVT), Bailey Lovie chart and Landolt Ring chart]. , 2002, Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde.

[5]  T. Hirose,et al.  Snellen visual acuity versus pattern reversal visual-evoked response acuity in clinical applications. , 1994, Ophthalmic research.

[6]  H. Spekreijse,et al.  Visual evoked potential estimation of visual activity with a Laplacian derivation , 2004, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[7]  E. Zrenner,et al.  [Improved objective visual assessment with visual evoked cortical potentials by rapid pattern stimuli sequences of different spatial frequency]. , 1988, Fortschritte der Ophthalmologie : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft.

[8]  Comparison of Snellen acuity and objective assessment using the spatial frequency sweep PVER , 1997, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[9]  D Regan,et al.  Speedy assessment of visual acuity in amblyopia by the evoked potential method. , 1977, Ophthalmologica. Journal international d'ophtalmologie. International journal of ophthalmology. Zeitschrift fur Augenheilkunde.

[10]  Ming-Wei Zhao,et al.  A new method of extrapolating the sweep pattern visual evoked potential acuity , 2007, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[11]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[12]  H Spekreijse,et al.  The laplacian analysis of the pattern onset response in man. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  J. W. Howe,et al.  The objective assessment of contrast sensitivity function by electrophysiological means. , 1984, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[14]  H. Spekreijse,et al.  Principal components analysis for source localization of VEPs in man , 1987, Vision Research.

[15]  A. Yekta,et al.  Visual evoked potentials, short wave-length automated perimetry, standard automated perimetry, contrast sensitivity and stereoacuity testing in visually asymptomatic eyes of patients with multiple sclerosis , 2013 .

[16]  William H. Ridder,et al.  Methods of visual acuity determination with the spatial frequency sweep visual evoked potential , 2004, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[17]  Susan J. Leat,et al.  Threshold determination in sweep VEP and the effects of criterion , 2009, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[18]  J. Nelson,et al.  Comparisons among Snellen, Psychophysical, and Evoked Potential Visual Acuity Determinations , 1985, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[19]  H. Jasper.  Report of the committee on methods of clinical examination in electroencephalography , 1958 .

[20]  K. T. Mullen,et al.  Spatial influences on colour opponent contributions to pattern detection , 1987, Vision Research.

[21]  M. Banks.  Visual acuity development in human infants: a re-evaluation. , 1977, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[22]  E. Zrenner,et al.  [Clinical significance of objective vision assessment using visually evoked cortical potentials induced by rapid pattern sequences of different spatial frequency]. , 1999, Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde.

[23]  Alice Mado Proverbio,et al.  Hemispheric Asymmetries for Spatial Frequency Discrimination in a Selective Attention Task , 1997, Brain and Cognition.

[24]  Lars Loumann Knudsen.  Visual acuity testing in diabetic subjects: the decimal progression chart versus the Freiburg visual acuity test , 2003, Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie.

[25]  H. Jasper,et al.  The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. , 1999, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[26]  Graham E. Holder,et al.  Assessment of patients with suspected non-organic visual loss using pattern appearance visual evoked potentials , 2007, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[27]  Björn Johansson,et al.  Fourier analysis of steady-state visual evoked potentials in subjects with normal and defective stereo vision , 2000, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[28]  E. Zrenner,et al.  Zur klinischen Bedeutung der objektiven Sehschärfenschätzung mit Hilfe der visuell evozierten kortikalen Potentiale durch schnelle Reizmustersequenzen unterschiedlicher Ortsfrequenz , 1999 .

[29]  M. Bach,et al.  The Freiburg Visual Acuity test--automatic measurement of visual acuity. , 1996, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[30]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  ALBERT-LUDWIGS-UNIVERSIT ¨ AT FREIBURG , 2006 .

[31]  B. Hjorth.  An on-line transformation of EEG scalp potentials into orthogonal source derivations. , 1975, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[32]  R. Hamilton,et al.  Rapid detection of threshold VEPs , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[33]  Michael Bach,et al.  Visual acuities "hand motion" and "counting fingers" can be quantified with the freiburg visual acuity test. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[34]  Vaegan,et al.  Visual evoked potentials standard (2004) , 2004, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[35]  M Bach,et al.  Visual evoked potential-based acuity assessment in normal vision, artificially degraded vision, and in patients , 2008, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[36]  J. Beer,et al.  Using the Freiburg Acuity and Contrast Test to Measure Visual Performance in USAF Personnel After PRK , 2004, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[37]  C T White,et al.  Evoked cortical responses to checkerboard patterns: effect of check-size as a function of visual acuity. , 1970, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[38]  Guideline Thirteen: Guidelines for Standard Electrode Position Nomenclature , 1994, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[39]  G. Harding,et al.  The scalp topography of the human visually evoked subcortical potential. , 1980, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[40]  V. Towle,et al.  Objective determination of human visual acuity from the visual evoked potential , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[41]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[42]  William H. Ridder,et al.  Reliability of acuities determined with the sweep visual evoked potential (sVEP) , 2012, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[43]  Michael S. Bradnam,et al.  Faster and more sensitive VEP recording in children , 2003, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[44]  Luiz Carlos L Silveira,et al.  Spatial luminance contrast sensitivity measured with transient VEP: comparison with psychophysics and evidence of multiple mechanisms. , 2007, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[45]  E. Marg,et al.  Effect of natural deprivation and unilateral eye patching on visual acuity of infants and children. Evoked potential measurements. , 1981, A M A Archives of Ophthalmology.

[46]  J. V. Odom,et al.  Acuity estimated by visually evoked potentials is affected by scaling , 1986, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[47]  C. Teping.  [Determination of visual acuity by the visually evoked cortical potential (author's transl)]. , 1981, Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde.

[48]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[49]  S. Sokol,et al.  Measurement of infant visual acuity from pattern reversal evoked potentials , 1978, Vision Research.

[50]  Wolfgang Wesemann,et al.  Sehschärfebestimmung mit Freiburger Visustest, Bailey-Lovie-Tafel und Landoltring-Tafel , 2002 .

[51]  M. R. Harter,et al.  An objective indicant of binocular vision in humans: size-specific interocular suppression of visual evoked potentials. , 1977, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.