The impact of dynamic capabilities on operational marketing and technological capabilities: investigating the role of environmental turbulence

Marketing and technological capabilities are primary drivers of a firm’s performance and thus of central interest to managers. Yet the way in which these two capabilities align with changing environments to secure superior performance remains unclear. Drawing on the dynamic capability view and data from a survey of 228 firms, this study proposes a model of how frequent dynamic capability utilization, assessed through its underlying processes of sensing and reconfiguring, relates to marketing and technological capabilities, as well as how market, technological, and competitor turbulence might affect these relationships. The results show that frequent sensing and reconfiguring have stronger positive effects in environments characterized by high competitor turbulence; however, frequent sensing can have negative relationships with marketing and technological capabilities in stable environments. Furthermore, marketing capabilities are positively associated with firm performance in highly competitive environments, whereas technological capabilities enhance performance in stable competitive environments.

[1]  J. Galbreath,et al.  Firm factors, industry structure and performance variation: New empirical evidence to a classic debate , 2008 .

[2]  R. Srivastava,et al.  Market-based capabilities and financial performance of firms: insights into marketing’s contribution to firm value , 2009 .

[3]  David J. Collis,et al.  Research Note: How Valuable are Organizational Capabilities? , 1994 .

[4]  H. Greve.  Performance, Aspirations, and Risky Organizational Change , 1998 .

[5]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[6]  Tasadduq A. Shervani,et al.  Market-Based Assets and Shareholder Value: A Framework for Analysis , 1998 .

[7]  C. P. Rao,et al.  The capabilities and performance advantages of market‐driven firms , 1999 .

[8]  W. DeSarbo,et al.  Revisiting the Miles and Snow Strategic Framework: Uncovering Interrelationships between Strategic Types, Capabilities, Environmental Uncertainty, and Firm Performance , 2005 .

[9]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Two Structural Equation Models: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory: , 1982 .

[10]  K. Zhou,et al.  How strategic orientations influence the building of dynamic capability in emerging economies , 2010 .

[11]  G. Day.  Closing the Marketing Capabilities Gap , 2011 .

[12]  N. Rajagopalan,et al.  The Influence of Acquisition Experience and Performance on Acquisition Behavior: Evidence From the U.S. Commercial Banking Industry , 2006 .

[13]  Lowell W. Busenitz,et al.  Dynamic capabilities and venture performance: The effects of venture capitalists , 2006 .

[14]  R. Calantone,et al.  New Product Success: Is It Really Controllable by Managers in Highly Turbulent Environments? , 2008 .

[15]  Gianmario Verona,et al.  Unbundling Dynamic Capabilities: an Exploratory Study of Continuous Product Innovation , 2003 .

[16]  Ian C. MacMillan,et al.  An Exploration of the Expertness of Outside Informants , 1993 .

[17]  R. Duncan.  Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty. , 1972 .

[18]  K. Zhou,et al.  Technological capability, strategic flexibility, and product innovation , 2009 .

[19]  G. Hancock,et al.  Performance of Bootstrapping Approaches to Model Test Statistics and Parameter Standard Error Estimation in Structural Equation Modeling , 2001 .

[20]  Walter J. Ferrier,et al.  The Role of Competitive Action in Market Share Erosion and Industry Dethronement: A Study of Industry Leaders and Challengers , 1999 .

[21]  C. Anthony Di Benedetto,et al.  The impact of structural and contextual factors on trust formation in product development teams , 2010 .

[22]  Henrich R. Greve,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of Firm Growth: Sequential Attention to Size and Performance Goals , 2008 .

[23]  M. Wedel,et al.  Market Segmentation: Conceptual and Methodological Foundations , 1997 .

[24]  Allen M. Weiss,et al.  Marketing in Turbulent Environments: Decision Processes and the Time-Sensitivity of Information , 1993 .

[25]  D. Teece.  Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance , 2007 .

[26]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[27]  Daniel A. Levinthal.  Organizational Adaptation and Environmental Selection-Interrelated Processes of Change , 1991 .

[28]  M. Sarkar,et al.  Alliance entrepreneurship and firm market performance , 2001 .

[29]  Allan Afuah,et al.  Mapping technological capabilities into product markets and competitive advantage: the case of cholesterol drugs , 2002 .

[30]  B. Menguc,et al.  Creating a firm-level dynamic capability through capitalizing on market orientation and innovativeness , 2006 .

[31]  Y. Caloghirou,et al.  Dynamic capabilities and their indirect impact on firm performance , 2012 .

[32]  P. Drnevich,et al.  Clarifying the conditions and limits of the contributions of ordinary and dynamic capabilities to relative firm performance , 2011 .

[33]  David Miller.  Strategy Making and Structure: Analysis and Implications for Performance , 1987 .

[34]  D. Straub,et al.  Editor's comments: a critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in MIS quarterly , 2012 .

[35]  Will Mitchell,et al.  Evolutionary diffusion: internal and external methods used to acquire encompassing, complementary, and incremental technological changes in the lithotripsy industry , 1998 .

[36]  V. Narayanan,et al.  Building Organizational and Scientific Platforms in the Pharmaceutical Industry: A Process Perspective on the Development of Dynamic Capabilities , 2009 .

[37]  Lei-Yu Wu,et al.  Applicability of the resource-based and dynamic-capability views under environmental volatility , 2010 .

[38]  Angela Paladino,et al.  Driving a resource orientation: reviewing the role of resource and capability characteristics , 2007 .

[39]  Robert F. DeVellis,et al.  Scale Development: Theory and Applications. , 1992 .

[40]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[41]  Frances J. Milliken,et al.  The role of managerial learning and interpretation in strategic persistence and reorientation: An empirical exploration , 1992 .

[42]  Danny Miller,et al.  SOURCES AND CONSEQUENCES OF COMPETITIVE INERTIA: A STUDY OF THE U.S. AIRLINE INDUSTRY. , 1994 .

[43]  George A. Marcoulides,et al.  Modern methods for business research , 1998 .

[44]  Gordon E. Greenley,et al.  THE PERFORMANCE IMPACT OF MARKETING RESOURCES , 2005 .

[45]  Rosanna Garcia,et al.  The Effects of Environmental Turbulence on New Product Development Strategy Planning , 2003 .

[46]  D. B. Montgomery,et al.  First‐mover advantages , 1988 .

[47]  Michael Song,et al.  Marketing and technology resource complementarity : An analysis of their Interaction Effect in two environmental contexts , 2005 .

[48]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences , 1993 .

[49]  E. Johnsen.  Richard M. Cyert & James G. March, A Behavioral Theory of The Firm, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1963, 332 s. , 1964 .

[50]  J. March,et al.  Variable risk preferences and the focus of attention , 1992 .

[51]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit , 1984 .

[52]  R. Daft,et al.  Chief executive scanning, environmental characteristics, and company performance: An empirical study , 1988 .

[53]  Alexander Hars,et al.  Web Based Knowledge Infrastructures for the Sciences: An Adaptive Document , 2000, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[54]  D. Leonard-Barton.  CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[55]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Structural modeling of heterogeneous data with partial least squares , 2010 .

[56]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[57]  P. M. Garcia-Villaverde,et al.  Capabilities and competitive tactics influences on performance: Implications of the moment of entry , 2008 .

[58]  S. Zahra,et al.  Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capabilities: A Review, Model and Research Agenda , 2006 .

[59]  Gerard George,et al.  Learning to be Capable: Patenting and Licensing at the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation 1925-2002 , 2005 .

[60]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Dynamic Capabilities: Current Debates and Future Directions , 2009 .

[61]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[62]  C. Ringle,et al.  The Impact of Brand Extension Success Drivers on Brand Extension Price Premiums , 2010 .

[63]  Douglas W. Vorhies,et al.  Improving customer-focused marketing capabilities and firm financial performance via marketing exploration and exploitation , 2011 .

[64]  H. Winklhofer,et al.  Index Construction with Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale Development , 2001 .

[65]  J. March,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm , 1964 .

[66]  S. Winter.  Understanding dynamic capabilities , 2003 .

[67]  R. Chandy,et al.  The Incumbent's Curse? Incumbency, Size, and Radical Product Innovation , 2000 .

[68]  Bruce A. Walters,et al.  Chief executive scanning emphases, environmental dynamism, and manufacturing firm performance , 2003 .

[69]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[70]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Response-Based Segmentation Using Finite Mixture Partial Least Squares - Theoretical Foundations and an Application to American Customer Satisfaction Index Data , 2010, Data Mining.

[71]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  Action characteristics as predictors of competitive responses , 1992 .

[72]  R. Calantone,et al.  The Impact of Market Knowledge Competence on New Product Advantage: Conceptualization and Empirical Examination , 1998 .

[73]  Neil A. Morgan,et al.  Understanding Firms’ Customer Satisfaction Information Usage , 2005 .

[74]  Stefan H. Thomke,et al.  Asset accumulation, interdependence and technological change: evidence from pharmaceutical drug discovery , 2002 .

[75]  Paul E. Spector.  Method Variance in Organizational Research , 2006 .

[76]  David A. Griffith,et al.  An Examination of Exploration and Exploitation Capabilities: Implications for Product Innovation and Market Performance , 2007 .

[77]  L. Stern,et al.  Conducting Interorganizational Research Using Key Informants , 1993 .

[78]  Erwin Danneels.  Trying to become a different type of company: dynamic capability at Smith Corona , 2011 .

[79]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research , 2012 .

[80]  M. Sarstedt,et al.  Uncovering and Treating Unobserved Heterogeneity with FIMIX-PLS: Which Model Selection Criterion Provides an Appropriate Number of Segments? , 2011 .

[81]  Neil A. Morgan.  Marketing and business performance , 2012 .

[82]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice , 2000, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[83]  E. Erdfelder,et al.  Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[84]  Cynthia S. Cycyota,et al.  What (Not) to Expect When Surveying Executives , 2006 .

[85]  Rebecca J. Slotegraaf,et al.  Linking marketing capabilities with profit growth , 2009 .

[86]  Matthew S. Kraatz,et al.  How Organizational Resources Affect Strategic Change and Performance in Turbulent Environments , 2001 .

[87]  Erwin Danneels,et al.  THE PROCESS OF TECHNOLOGICAL COMPETENCE LEVERAGING , 2007 .

[88]  W. Reinartz,et al.  An Empirical Comparison of the Efficacy of Covariance-Based and Variance-Based SEM , 2009 .

[89]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[90]  Maurizio Zollo,et al.  Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities , 2002 .

[91]  Rudolf R. Sinkovics,et al.  Crossing Borders and Industry Sectors: Behavioral Governance in Strategic Alliances and Product Innovation for Competitive Advantage , 2013 .

[92]  Frank Huber,et al.  Capturing Customer Heterogeneity using a Finite Mixture PLS Approach , 2002 .

[93]  Richard Makadok.  Toward a synthesis of the resource‐based and dynamic‐capability views of rent creation , 2001 .

[94]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Dynamic capabilities : understanding strategic change in organizations , 2007 .

[95]  Sangphet Hanvanich,et al.  The relationship of learning and memory with organizational performance: The moderating role of turbulence , 2006 .

[96]  Ralf Wilden,et al.  Dynamic capabilities and performance : strategy, structure and environment , 2013 .

[97]  T. C. Powell.  Organizational alignment as competitive advantage , 1992 .

[98]  M. Sarstedt.  A review of recent approaches for capturing heterogeneity in partial least squares path modelling , 2008 .

[99]  John C. Narver,et al.  The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability , 1990 .

[100]  G. Day.  The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations , 1994 .

[101]  Cheryl Burke Jarvis,et al.  A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research , 2003 .

[102]  R. Lennox,et al.  Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. , 1991 .

[103]  S. Dutta,et al.  Absorptive Capacity in High-Technology Markets: The Competitive Advantage of the Haves , 2006 .

[104]  Adriana Rejc Buhovac,et al.  Identifying and Exploiting the Inter relationships between Technological and Marketing Capabilities , 2008 .

[105]  Herman Wold,et al.  Soft modelling: intermediate between traditional model building and data analysis , 1980 .

[106]  Oliver Schilke.  On the Contingent Value of Dynamic Capabilities for Competitive Advantage: The Nonlinear Moderating Effect of Environmental Dynamism , 2014 .

[107]  Neil A. Morgan,et al.  Benchmarking Marketing Capabilities for Sustainable Competitive Advantage , 2005 .

[108]  R. Vandenberg,et al.  A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Organizational Research , 2000 .

[109]  David G. Sirmon,et al.  The Dynamic Interplay of Capability Strengths and Weaknesses: Investigating the Bases of Temporary Competitive Advantage , 2010 .

[110]  Rudolf R. Sinkovics,et al.  The Use of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in International Marketing , 2009 .

[111]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. , 1990 .

[112]  Neil A. Morgan,et al.  The impact of product market strategy-organizational culture fit on business performance , 2011 .

[113]  Dovev Lavie,et al.  Capability Reconfiguration: An Analysis of Incumbent Responses to Technological Change , 2006 .

[114]  Huan Zou,et al.  How do new ventures grow? Firm capabilities, growth strategies and performance , 2009 .

[115]  J. Baum,et al.  STRATEGIC DECISION SPEED AND FIRM PERFORMANCE , 2003 .

[116]  Erwin Danneels.  Organizational antecedents of second‐order competences , 2008 .

[117]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Editorial - Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling: Rigorous Applications, Better Results and Higher Acceptance , 2013 .

[118]  B. Chakravarthy.  Measuring strategic performance , 1986 .

[119]  Nofal Nagles García.  Reseña de "Dynamic capabilities. Understanding strategic change in organizations" de Constance E. Helfat, Sydney Finkelstein, Will Mitchell, Margareth Peteraf, Harbir Singh, David J. Teece, Sidney Winter , 2010 .

[120]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[121]  H. G. Heneman,et al.  Comparisons of self- and superior ratings of managerial performance. , 1974 .

[122]  E. Penrose.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[123]  Kalevi Kyläheiko,et al.  Entrepreneurial Orientation, Dynamic Capabilities and International Performance , 2005 .

[124]  P. Barr,et al.  Environmental Context, Managerial Cognition, and Strategic Action: An Integrated View , 2008 .

[125]  Mary Tripsas.  Unraveling The Process Of Creative Destruction: Complementary Assets And Incumbent Survival In The Typesetter Industry , 1997 .

[126]  Anne S. Miner,et al.  The Impact of Organizational Memory on New Product Performance and Creativity , 1997 .

[127]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[128]  Lorne D. Booker,et al.  The mediating effect of organizational reputation on customer loyalty and service recommendation in the banking industry , 2007 .

[129]  Yiannis E. Spanos,et al.  An examination into the causal logic of rent generation: contrasting Porter's competitive strategy framework and the resource-based perspective , 2001 .

[130]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures , 2001 .

[131]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet , 2011 .

[132]  R. Sitgreaves.  Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). , 1979 .

[133]  Jean-François Henri.  ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE AND PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS , 2006 .

[134]  B. Menguc,et al.  Balancing exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of competitive intensity , 2005 .

[135]  Stanley F. Slater,et al.  Intelligence generation and superior customer value , 2000 .

[136]  M. Sarstedt,et al.  Treating unobserved heterogeneity in PLS path modeling: a comparison of FIMIX-PLS with different data analysis strategies , 2010 .