Coalbed methane reservoir data and simulator parameter uncertainty modelling for CO2 storage performance assessment

Abstract Laboratory studies and a number of field pilots have demonstrated that CO 2 injection into coal seams has the potential to enhance coalbed methane (CBM) recovery with the added advantage that most of the injected CO 2 can be stored permanently in coal. The concept of storing CO 2 in geologic formations as a safe and effective greenhouse gas mitigation option requires public and regulatory acceptance. In this context it is important to develop a good understanding of the reservoir performance, uncertainties and the risks that are associated with geological storage. The paper presented refers to the sources of uncertainty involved in CO 2 storage performance assessment in coalbed methane reservoirs and demonstrates their significance using extensive digital well log data representing the Manville coals in Alberta, Canada. The spatial variability of the reservoir properties was captured through geostatistical analysis, and sequential Gaussian simulations of these provided multiple realisations for the reservoir simulator inputs. A number of CO 2 injection scenarios with variable matrix swelling coefficients were evaluated using a 2D reservoir model and spatially distributed realisations of total net thickness and permeability.

[1]  Sevket Durucan,et al.  Gas Storage and Flow in Coalbed Reservoirs: Implementation of a Bidisperse Pore Model for Gas Diffusion in Coal Matrix , 2005 .

[2]  U. Ahmed,et al.  An Advanced and Integrated Approach to Coal Formation Evaluation , 1991 .

[3]  R. A. McBane,et al.  Formation Evaluation of Exploration Coalbed-Methane Wells , 1994 .

[4]  J. Chilès,et al.  Geostatistics: Modeling Spatial Uncertainty , 1999 .

[5]  Clayton V. Deutsch,et al.  GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide , 1993 .

[6]  L.G.H. van der Meer,et al.  Comparison of Numerical Simulators for Greenhouse Gas Storage in Coal Beds, Part II: Flue Gas Injection , 2003 .

[7]  Timothy C. Coburn,et al.  Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation , 2000, Technometrics.

[8]  Ji-Quan Shi,et al.  A numerical simulation study of the Allison Unit CO2-ECBM pilot: The impact of matrix shrinkage and swelling on ECBM production and CO2 injectivity , 2005 .

[9]  John R. Seidle,et al.  Experimental Measurement of Coal Matrix Shrinkage Due to Gas Desorption and Implications for Cleat Permeability Increases , 1995 .

[10]  A. C. Bumb,et al.  Stress-Dependent Permeability and Porosity of Coal and Other Geologic Formations , 1988 .

[11]  Sevket Durucan,et al.  A model for changes in coalbed permeability during primary and enhanced methane, recovery , 2005 .

[12]  William D. Gunter,et al.  Alberta Multiwell Micro-Pilot Testing for CBM Properties, Enhanced Methane Recovery and CO2 Storage Potential , 2004 .

[13]  Sevket Durucan,et al.  A bidisperse pore diffusion model for methane displacement desorption in coal by CO2 injection , 2003 .

[14]  Scott Reeves,et al.  THE ALLISON UNIT CO{sub 2}-ECBM PILOT: A RESERVOIR MODELING STUDY , 2003 .

[15]  William D. Gunter,et al.  CO2 storage and enhanced methane production: Field testing at Fenn-Big Valley, Alberta, Canada, with application , 2005 .