An Investigation of First-Year Students’ Pedagogical Readiness to E-Learning and Assessment in Open and Distance Learning: An University of South Africa Context

Despite the predominance of e-learning in both the literature and within instructional settings, first year students’ pedagogical experiences of e-learning readiness and assessment in open and distance learning are rarely assessed. This research study sought to obtain empirical evidence of first-year students’ pedagogical readiness to e-learning and assessment at the University of South Africa (Unisa), an open and distance learning (ODL) institution. The research question: Are Unisa’s first-year students pedagogically ready for e-learning and e-assessment? Provided the focus the study. Focus-group and individual interviews were conducted to collect data. The interviews were digitally recorded, trancribed and analysed using Collaizi’s data analysis framework. This framework was chosen because of its ability to provide clear steps for data analysis. Findings show that there is a high level of acceptance towards the adoption of e-learning and e-assessment as modes of teaching and learning despite shortage of e-learning resources. Furthermore, the study revealed that e-readiness is important because it allows enablers and policy makers to take appropriate policy measures and implement development plans that help create informed participants in e-learning endeavors. DOI: 10.5901/mjss.2013.v4n13p353

[1]  K. Perreault,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2011 .

[2]  C. Moustakas Phenomenological Research Methods , 1994 .

[3]  D. Silverman Doing Qualitative Research , 2009 .

[4]  S. Meyer The adoption of technology in higher/nursing education. , 2001, Curationis.

[5]  Debra Haney Assessing organizational readiness for E-learning: 70 questions to ask , 2002 .

[6]  George M. Piskurich Preparing learners for e-Learning , 2003 .

[7]  W. Neuman,et al.  Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 2002 .

[8]  A W Tony Bates,et al.  Technology, e-learning, and distance education , 1995 .

[9]  Helen Boulton,et al.  Managing e-Learning: what are the real implications for schools? , 2008 .

[10]  Azzedine Lansari,et al.  Are Students Ready to Adopt E-Learning? A Preliminary E-readiness Study of a University in the Gulf Region , 2011 .

[11]  R. Chenail Making Phenomenological Inquiry Accessible: A Review of Jonathan A. Smith, Paul Flowers, and Michael Larkin’s Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method, and Research , 2009 .

[12]  John R. Verduin,et al.  Distance Education: The Foundations of Effective Practice , 1991 .

[13]  Earl R. Babbie,et al.  The practice of social research , 1969 .

[15]  Linda S. Lotto Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods , 1986 .

[16]  Ryan Watkins,et al.  E-Learning Companion: A Student's Guide to Online Success , 2007 .

[17]  Pannee Suanpang,et al.  E-Learning in Thailand: An Analysis and Case Study. , 2006 .

[18]  D. Olson,et al.  Technology Enhanced Learning for Occupational and Environmental Health Nursing , 2000, AAOHN journal : official journal of the American Association of Occupational Health Nurses.

[19]  Lois W. Sayrs Interviews : an introduction to qualitative research interviewing , 1996 .

[20]  Greg Kearsley Is online learning for everybody , 2002 .

[21]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[22]  G. Gibbs,et al.  Conditions Under Which Assessment Supports Students’ Learning , 2005 .

[23]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[24]  N. Denzin,et al.  Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials , 2012 .