Numerical and experimental comparison of tracer particle and averaging techniques for particle velocities in a fluidized bed

Abstract Particle tracking methods using emitted radiation are attractive for following motion in opaque systems such as granular materials. Leading examples are Positron Emission Particle Tracking (PEPT) and Radioactive Particle Tracking (RPT). The application of such techniques sometimes requires the use of tracer particles which differ in size, density and/or shape from the particles of interest. This study investigates the extent to which such differences affect the result of the study by using the open source MFIX-DEM software to model particle motion in the travelling fluidized bed experiments. The results are compared with previously reported experimental studies using both PEPT and RPT. Consistent numerical results were obtained for both PEPT and RPT tracer particles. In determining averaged velocities using such techniques, there is a choice to be made between averaging velocities of particles crossing a virtual plane over a period of time (the “face-average” approach) or those passing through a defined volume over time (the “volume-average” approach). The differences between results obtained with these two approaches are shown to be significant in this case, for both computation and experiment.

[1]  Liqiang Lu,et al.  Assessment of different coarse graining strategies to simulate polydisperse gas-solids flow , 2018 .

[2]  Jamal Chaouki,et al.  Comparison of particle velocity measurement techniques in a fluidized bed operating in the square-nosed slugging flow regime , 2016 .

[3]  P. Cundall,et al.  A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies , 1979 .

[4]  Thomas Leadbeater,et al.  Positron imaging systems for studying particulate, granular and multiphase flows , 2012 .

[5]  Danesh K. Tafti,et al.  Hybrid parallelism in MFIX CFD-DEM using OpenMP , 2014 .

[6]  J. Chaouki,et al.  Investigation of particle velocity in FCC gas-fluidized beds based on different measurement techniques , 2015 .

[7]  William A. Rogers,et al.  Numerical Simulation and Experimental Study of the Gas–Solid Flow Behavior Inside a Full-Loop Circulating Fluidized Bed: Evaluation of Different Drag Models , 2018 .

[8]  Jinghai Li,et al.  EMMS-based discrete particle method (EMMS–DPM) for simulation of gas–solid flows , 2014 .

[9]  William A. Rogers,et al.  CFD-DEM modeling the effect of column size and bed height on minimum fluidization velocity in micro fluidized beds with Geldart B particles , 2017 .

[10]  William A. Rogers,et al.  Particles climbing along a vertically vibrating tube: numerical simulation using the Discrete Element Method (DEM) , 2017 .

[11]  S. Armfield,et al.  A representation of curved boundaries for the solution of the Navier-Stokes equations on a staggered three-dimensional Cartesian grid , 2003 .

[12]  Jamal Chaouki,et al.  Radioactive particle tracking in multiphase reactors: Principles and applications , 1997 .

[13]  Said Elghobashi,et al.  On predicting particle-laden turbulent flows , 1994 .

[14]  Sina Tebianian,et al.  Comparison of alternative advanced experimental techniques for measurement of hydrodynamic characteristics of gas-fluidized beds , 2015 .

[15]  Said Elgobashi,et al.  An Updated Classification Map of Particle-Laden Turbulent Flows , 2006 .

[16]  S. Pannala,et al.  Open-source MFIX-DEM software for gas-solids flows: Part I – verification studies , 2012 .

[17]  S. B. Reddy Karri,et al.  4 – Gas Distributor and Plenum Design in Fluidized Beds , 1998 .

[18]  Liqiang Lu,et al.  Computer virtual experiment on fluidized beds using a coarse-grained discrete particle method-EMMS-DPM , 2016 .

[19]  Bernd Epple,et al.  Improvement, validation and application of CFD]DEM model to dense gas-solid flow in a fluidized bed , 2013 .

[20]  J. Kuipers,et al.  Numerical investigation of the vertical plunging force of a spherical intruder into a prefluidized granular bed. , 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[21]  James R. Percival,et al.  Verification and validation of a coarse grain model of the DEM in a bubbling fluidized bed , 2014 .

[22]  Arthur T. Andrews,et al.  Multiscale modeling of gas-fluidized beds , 2006 .

[23]  Jamal Chaouki,et al.  Gas phase hydrodynamics in the riser of a circulating fluidized bed , 1993 .

[24]  J. Chaouki,et al.  Traveling column for comparison of invasive and non-invasive fluidization voidage measurement techniques , 2013 .

[25]  J. Chaouki,et al.  Solids flux measurements via alternate techniques in a gas-fluidized bed , 2016 .

[26]  J. F. Dietiker,et al.  Multiphase Flow with Interphase eXchanges Cartesian Grid User Guide 1 , 2015 .

[27]  Paola Lettieri,et al.  X-ray imaging for flow characterization and investigation of invasive probe interference in travelling fluidized bed , 2015 .

[28]  Hsiaotao Bi,et al.  Annular wall layer thickness in circulating fluidized bed risers , 1996 .

[29]  Danesh K. Tafti,et al.  Development of parallel DEM for the open source code MFIX , 2013 .

[30]  M. Syamlal,et al.  MFIX documentation theory guide , 1993 .

[31]  Jam Hans Kuipers,et al.  Detailed numerical simulation of an intruder impacting on a granular bed using a hybrid discrete particle and immersed boundary (DP-IB) method , 2013 .

[32]  Tingwen Li,et al.  Validation of a 2.5D CFD model for cylindrical gas–solids fluidized beds , 2015 .

[33]  Jam Hans Kuipers,et al.  Two-fluid modeling of three-dimensional cylindrical gas–solid fluidized beds using the kinetic theory of granular flow , 2013 .