Unusual Failure of Modular TKA Prosthesis and Screw Migration following Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

Introduction: The use of modular implants for revision TKA are ever increasing in number due to their definitive advantage over their monoblock counterparts by providing the surgeon with the versatility needed to achieve equal gaps and manage bone defects. This superiority comes at the cost of certain unique complications attributable to its modular design such as loosening and fractures at the areas of component coupling that are prone to fatigue failure with suboptimal fixation. Case Report: We present a case of modular femoral component failure in a 59-year man of Asian decent after revision TKA secondary to disengagement and migration of the extension stem locking bolt of a Total Condylar-III prosthesis. Patient presented with pain, effusion, and instability 2.5 years after stage-2 revision TKA. Radiographs revealed migration of the femur-stem locking bolt into the joint cavity. The femoral component and stem were loose. The locking bolt was extracted, and he underwent re-revision surgery with revised femoral components. Conclusion: Stem-condylar junction of modern modular TKA implants are prone to early loosening and failure. This diagnosis should be anticipated on serial follow-up radiographs and in patients who complain of sudden onset of instability following revision surgery.

[1]  V. Bansal,et al.  Disengagement of tibial insert locking pin in total knee arthroplasty - A rare failure case report. , 2022, Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma.

[2]  G. Scuderi**,et al.  Zonal Fixation in Revision TKA: The Key Is Metaphyseal Fixation , 2021, The Journal of Knee Surgery.

[3]  T. Lu,et al.  Influence of extension stem length and diameter on clinical and radiographic outcomes of revision total knee arthroplasty , 2020, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[4]  A. Leithner,et al.  Trends and Economic Impact of Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in Central Europe: Findings from the Austrian National Database , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[5]  M. A. O. Ignacio,et al.  How to cite this article , 2016 .

[6]  P. Pankaj,et al.  The role of complex clinical scenarios in the failure of modular components following revision total knee arthroplasty: A finite element study , 2015, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[7]  F. Haddad,et al.  Zonal fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty. , 2015, The bone & joint journal.

[8]  D. Dalury,et al.  Why are total knee arthroplasties being revised? , 2013, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[9]  J. Suh,et al.  Detection of locking bolt loosening in the stem-condyle junction of a modular femoral stem in revision total knee arthroplasty. , 2010, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[10]  Jocelyn M. Cottrell,et al.  Failure at the taper lock of a modular stemmed femoral implant in revision knee arthroplasty. A report of two cases and a retrieval analysis. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  L. Whiteside Cementless Fixation in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  D. Carden,et al.  Acute locking in revision total knee arthroplasty due to disengagement of the locking screw , 2005, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[13]  D. Berry,et al.  Failure of the stem-condyle junction of a modular femoral stem in revision total knee arthroplasty: a report of five cases. , 2001, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[14]  C. Hidaka,et al.  Disengagement of a Locking Screw from a Modular Stem in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. A Report of Three Cases* , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  W. Long,et al.  Revision Knee Arthroplasty: The Limits of Press Fit Medullary Fixation , 1995, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  G. Scuderi**,et al.  Mechanisms of failure of the femoral and tibial components in total knee arthroplasty. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.