Approach bias modification in alcohol dependence: Do clinical effects replicate and for whom does it work best?

Background: Alcoholism is a progressive neurocognitive developmental disorder. Recent evidence shows that computerized training interventions (Cognitive Bias Modification, CBM) can reverse some of these maladaptively changed neurocognitive processes. A first clinical study of a CBM, called alcohol-avoidance training, found that trained alcoholic patients showed less relapse at one-year follow-up than control patients. The present study tested the replication of this result, and questions about mediation and moderation. Methods: 509 alcohol-dependent patients received treatment as usual (primarily Cognitive Behavior Therapy) inpatient treatment. Before and after treatment, the implicit approach bias was measured with the Alcohol Approach-Avoidance Task. Half of the patients were randomly assigned to CBM, the other half received treatment as usual only. Background variables, psychopathology and executive control were tested as possible moderating variables of CBM. One year after treatment, follow-up data about relapse were collected. Results: The group receiving CBM developed alcohol-avoidance behavior and reported significantly lower relapse rates at one-year follow-up. Change in alcohol-approach bias mediated this effect. Moderation analyses demonstrated that older patients and patients with a strong approach-bias at pretest profited most from CBM. Conclusions: CBM is a promising treatment add-on in alcohol addiction and may counter some of the maladaptive neurocognitive effects of long-term alcoholism.

[1]  R. Wiers,et al.  Automatic processes in at-risk adolescents: the role of alcohol-approach tendencies and response inhibition in drinking behavior. , 2012, Addiction.

[2]  C. Beard,et al.  Socially anxious primary care patients' attitudes toward cognitive bias modification (CBM): a qualitative study. , 2012, Behavioural and cognitive psychotherapy.

[3]  W. van den Brink,et al.  Approach-Bias Predicts Development of Cannabis Problem Severity in Heavy Cannabis Users: Results from a Prospective FMRI Study , 2012, PloS one.

[4]  Richie Poulton,et al.  Persistent cannabis users show neuropsychological decline from childhood to midlife , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Brain training in progress: a review of trainability in healthy seniors , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[6]  M. Field,et al.  To Approach or Avoid Alcohol? Automatic and Self-Reported Motivational Tendencies in Alcohol Dependence , 2012, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[7]  Vanessa Sluming,et al.  Calibrated fMRI during a cognitive Stroop task reveals reduced metabolic response with increasing age , 2012, NeuroImage.

[8]  D. Goldman,et al.  Pharmacogenetic approaches to the treatment of alcohol addiction , 2011, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[9]  A. M. Ruscio,et al.  A meta-analysis of the effect of cognitive bias modification on anxiety and depression. , 2011, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  Antonio Verdejo-García,et al.  Combined Goal Management Training and Mindfulness meditation improve executive functions and decision-making performance in abstinent polysubstance abusers. , 2011, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[11]  Charles T. Taylor,et al.  Predictors of response to an attention modification program in generalized social phobia. , 2011, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[12]  Katrijn Houben,et al.  Resisting temptation: decreasing alcohol-related affect and drinking behavior by training response inhibition. , 2011, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[13]  Reinout W. Wiers,et al.  Getting a Grip on Drinking Behavior , 2011, Psychological science.

[14]  R. Wiers,et al.  Retraining Automatic Action Tendencies Changes Alcoholic Patients’ Approach Bias for Alcohol and Improves Treatment Outcome , 2011, Psychological science.

[15]  Paul F. Hill,et al.  Remember the Future: Working Memory Training Decreases Delay Discounting Among Stimulant Addicts , 2011, Biological Psychiatry.

[16]  D. Yurgelun-Todd,et al.  Adolescents at risk for alcohol abuse demonstrate altered frontal lobe activation during Stroop performance. , 2011, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[17]  M. Pérez-García,et al.  What are the specific vs. generalized effects of drugs of abuse on neuropsychological performance? , 2011, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[18]  B. Casey,et al.  Neurobiology of the adolescent brain and behavior: implications for substance use disorders. , 2010, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[19]  Y. Bar-Haim Research review: Attention bias modification (ABM): a novel treatment for anxiety disorders. , 2010, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[20]  Reinout W Wiers,et al.  Clinical effectiveness of attentional bias modification training in abstinent alcoholic patients. , 2010, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[21]  E. Holmes,et al.  Supplemental Information , 2009 .

[22]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Correlational biases in mean response latency differences. , 2010, Statistical methodology.

[23]  R. Wiers,et al.  Retraining automatic action-tendencies to approach alcohol in hazardous drinkers. , 2010, Addiction.

[24]  Jian Wang,et al.  An fMRI stroop task study of prefrontal cortical function in normal aging, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer's disease. , 2009, Current Alzheimer research.

[25]  R. Wiers,et al.  A short fuse after alcohol: Implicit power associations predict aggressiveness after alcohol consumption in young heavy drinkers with limited executive control , 2009, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[26]  C. Boettiger,et al.  Impulsivity, frontal lobes and risk for addiction , 2009, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[27]  K. Sher,et al.  Is "maturing out" of problematic alcohol involvement related to personality change? , 2009, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[28]  Javad Salehi Fadardi,et al.  Reversing the sequence: reducing alcohol consumption by overcoming alcohol attentional bias. , 2009, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[29]  R. Wiers,et al.  Response inhibition moderates the relationship between implicit associations and drinking behavior. , 2009, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[30]  R. Wiers,et al.  Relatively strong automatic appetitive action‐tendencies in male carriers of the OPRM1 G‐allele , 2009, Genes, brain, and behavior.

[31]  L. Clark,et al.  Impulsivity as a vulnerability marker for substance-use disorders: Review of findings from high-risk research, problem gamblers and genetic association studies , 2008, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[32]  Marc N. Potenza,et al.  Pretreatment Brain Activation During Stroop Task Is Associated with Outcomes in Cocaine-Dependent Patients , 2008, Biological Psychiatry.

[33]  Shu-Chen Li,et al.  Working memory plasticity in old age: practice gain, transfer, and maintenance. , 2008, Psychology and aging.

[34]  C. Marker,et al.  Automatic associations and panic disorder: trajectories of change over the course of treatment. , 2008, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[35]  Dexuan Zhang,et al.  Cognitive control explored by linear modelling behaviour and fMRI data during Stroop tasks , 2008, Physiological measurement.

[36]  Jerry L. Grenard,et al.  Interactions between implicit and explicit cognition and working memory capacity in the prediction of alcohol use in at-risk adolescents. , 2008, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[37]  M. Le Moal,et al.  Addiction and the brain antireward system. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[38]  Matthew S. Fritz,et al.  Distribution of the product confidence limits for the indirect effect: Program PRODCLIN , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[39]  M. Rinck,et al.  Approach and avoidance in fear of spiders. , 2007, Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry.

[40]  Matt Field,et al.  Experimental manipulation of attentional biases in heavy drinkers: do the effects generalise? , 2007, Psychopharmacology.

[41]  Reinout W Wiers,et al.  Attentional re-training decreases attentional bias in heavy drinkers without generalization. , 2007, Addiction.

[42]  Reinout W. Wiers,et al.  Implicit Cognition and Addiction , 2006 .

[43]  A. Bechara Decision making, impulse control and loss of willpower to resist drugs: a neurocognitive perspective , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[44]  D. Fishbain,et al.  Are alcoholism treatments effective? The Project MATCH data , 2005, BMC public health.

[45]  P. McEvoy,et al.  Comparison of three models of alcohol craving in young adults: a cross-validation. , 2004, Addiction.

[46]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[47]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  Stalking the perfect measure of implicit self-esteem: the blind men and the elephant revisited? , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[48]  L C Sobell,et al.  Natural recovery from alcohol and drug problems: methodological review of the research with suggestions for future directions. , 2000, Addiction.

[49]  N. Schmitz,et al.  The Symptom Check-List-90-R (SCL-90-R): A German validation study , 2000, Quality of Life Research.

[50]  A. Leshner Addiction is a brain disease, and it matters. , 1997, Science.

[51]  O. Aasland,et al.  Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption--II. , 1993, Addiction.

[52]  D. J. Lee Society and the Adolescent Self-Image , 1969 .

[53]  G. Crombez,et al.  On the predictive validity of automatically activated approach/avoidance tendencies in abstaining alcohol-dependent patients. , 2013, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[54]  R. Wiers,et al.  Adolescent threat-related interpretive bias and its modification: the moderating role of regulatory control. , 2012, Behaviour research and therapy.

[55]  Evan M. Gordon,et al.  Developmental cognitive neuroscience , 2011, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.

[56]  R. Wiers,et al.  Implicit cognition in health psychology: Why common sense goes out of the window , 2010 .

[57]  N. Volkow,et al.  Neurocircuitry of Addiction , 2010, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[58]  Jerry L. Grenard,et al.  Working memory capacity moderates the predictive effects of drug-related associations on substance use. , 2008, Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors.

[59]  P. Conrod,et al.  To Drink or Not to Drink: The Role of Automatic and Controlled Cognitive Processes in the Etiology of Alcohol-Related Problems , 2006 .

[60]  Kenneth J Sher,et al.  The development of alcohol use disorders. , 2005, Annual review of clinical psychology.

[61]  P. Y. Herzberg,et al.  Eine revidierte Fassung der deutschsprachigen Skala zum Selbstwertgefühl von Rosenberg , 2003 .

[62]  J. Ridley Studies of Interference in Serial Verbal Reactions , 2001 .

[63]  Maristela Monteiro,et al.  AUDIT - The alcohol use disorders identification test: guidelines for use in primary care. , 2001 .

[64]  U. Staudinger,et al.  Lifespan psychology: theory and application to intellectual functioning. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[65]  D. Mackinnon,et al.  A Simulation Study of Mediated Effect Measures. , 1995, Multivariate behavioral research.

[66]  K. Mann,et al.  Alcoholics’ selective processing of alcohol related words and cognitive performance on a Stroop task , 1994, European Psychiatry.

[67]  E. Crone,et al.  Addiction, adolescence, and the integration of control and motivation , 2011, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.